REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A common goal in statistics and machine learning is to learn models that can perform well against distributional shifts, such as latent heterogeneous subpopulations, unknown covariate shifts, or unmodeled temporal effects. We develop and analyze a distributionally robust stochastic optimization (DRO) framework that learns a model providing good performance against perturbations to the data-generating distribution. We give a convex formulation for the problem, providing several convergence guarantees. We prove finite-sample minimax upper and lower bounds, showing that distributional robustness sometimes comes at a cost in convergence rates. We give limit theorems for the learned parameters, where we fully specify the limiting distribution so that confidence intervals can be computed. On real tasks including generalizing to unknown subpopulations, fine-grained recognition, and providing good tail performance, the distributionally robust approach often exhibits improved performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
GRAPE: Optimize Data Mixture for Group Robust Multi-target Adaptive Pretraining
GRAPE uses a minimax group-DRO scheme to reweight both source domains and target tasks during pretraining, improving multi-task reasoning and low-resource language modeling.
-
RUBRIC: Realism--Utility Balanced Ranking for Imbalanced Classification
RUBRIC ranks and budget-selects oversampling candidates by a realism–utility score plus optional submodular diversity, with a claimed margin-based generalization tightening and mixed gains on fraud benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.