REVIEW 1 cited by
Meta-Learning Multi-task Communication
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we describe a general framework: Parameters Read-Write Networks (PRaWNs) to systematically analyze current neural models for multi-task learning, in which we find that existing models expect to disentangle features into different spaces while features learned in practice are still entangled in shared space, leaving potential hazards for other training or unseen tasks. We propose to alleviate this problem by incorporating an inductive bias into the process of multi-task learning, that each task can keep informed of not only the knowledge stored in other tasks but the way how other tasks maintain their knowledge. In practice, we achieve above inductive bias by allowing different tasks to communicate by passing both hidden variables and gradients explicitly. Experimentally, we evaluate proposed methods on three groups of tasks and two types of settings (\textsc{in-task} and \textsc{out-of-task}). Quantitative and qualitative results show their effectiveness.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Exploring Domain Shift in Extractive Text Summarization
Publication source acts as a domain in extractive summarization, and domain tags plus meta-learning reduce, but do not eliminate, the performance drop on unseen news outlets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.