Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automated Theorem Proving in Intuitionistic Propositional Logic by Deep Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.00796 v1 pith:E2RYHJC2 submitted 2018-11-02 cs.LG cs.AIcs.LOstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.LOstat.ML
keywords learningproverdeepreinforcementtheoremalgorithmautomateddata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The problem-solving in automated theorem proving (ATP) can be interpreted as a search problem where the prover constructs a proof tree step by step. In this paper, we propose a deep reinforcement learning algorithm for proof search in intuitionistic propositional logic. The most significant challenge in the application of deep learning to the ATP is the absence of large, public theorem database. We, however, overcame this issue by applying a novel data augmentation procedure at each iteration of the reinforcement learning. We also improve the efficiency of the algorithm by representing the syntactic structure of formulas by a novel compact graph representation. Using the large volume of augmented data, we train highly accurate graph neural networks that approximate the value function for the set of the syntactic structures of formulas. Our method is also cost-efficient in terms of computational time. We will show that our prover outperforms Coq's $\texttt{tauto}$ tactic, a prover based on human-engineered heuristics. Within the specified time limit, our prover solved 84% of the theorems in a benchmark library, while $\texttt{tauto}$ was able to solve only 52%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Grammars of Formal Uncertainty: When to Trust LLMs in Automated Reasoning Tasks

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A grammar-based model of LLM-generated SMT-LIB code produces uncertainty signals that predict formalization errors on some reasoning tasks, with fused signals giving large error reductions only in an in-sample evaluation.

Pith tools