REVIEW 2 cited by
Exploring Connections Between Active Learning and Model Extraction
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Machine learning is being increasingly used by individuals, research institutions, and corporations. This has resulted in the surge of Machine Learning-as-a-Service (MLaaS) - cloud services that provide (a) tools and resources to learn the model, and (b) a user-friendly query interface to access the model. However, such MLaaS systems raise privacy concerns such as model extraction. In model extraction attacks, adversaries maliciously exploit the query interface to steal the model. More precisely, in a model extraction attack, a good approximation of a sensitive or proprietary model held by the server is extracted (i.e. learned) by a dishonest user who interacts with the server only via the query interface. This attack was introduced by Tramer et al. at the 2016 USENIX Security Symposium, where practical attacks for various models were shown. We believe that better understanding the efficacy of model extraction attacks is paramount to designing secure MLaaS systems. To that end, we take the first step by (a) formalizing model extraction and discussing possible defense strategies, and (b) drawing parallels between model extraction and established area of active learning. In particular, we show that recent advancements in the active learning domain can be used to implement powerful model extraction attacks, and investigate possible defense strategies.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
High Accuracy and High Fidelity Extraction of Neural Networks
Given only prediction access, an adversary can exactly recover the weights of a two-layer ReLU network, and semi-supervised learning makes accuracy extraction far more query-efficient.
-
When Do PEFT Adaptations Leak Structure? Measuring Black-Box Structural Bounds in Public-Base Model Services
Residual differences between a public base model and its private PEFT adaptation can reveal the adaptation family, rank bucket, and sometimes the exact private checkpoint, but only under known-base, rich-output conditions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.