Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

A simple yet effective baseline for non-attributed graph classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.03508 v3 pith:IGDZWGLL submitted 2018-11-08 cs.LG stat.ML

A simple yet effective baseline for non-attributed graph classification

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords graphclassificationbaselinerepresentationsimplelearningdatasetseffective
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Graphs are complex objects that do not lend themselves easily to typical learning tasks. Recently, a range of approaches based on graph kernels or graph neural networks have been developed for graph classification and for representation learning on graphs in general. As the developed methodologies become more sophisticated, it is important to understand which components of the increasingly complex methods are necessary or most effective. As a first step, we develop a simple yet meaningful graph representation, and explore its effectiveness in graph classification. We test our baseline representation for the graph classification task on a range of graph datasets. Interestingly, this simple representation achieves similar performance as the state-of-the-art graph kernels and graph neural networks for non-attributed graph classification. Its performance on classifying attributed graphs is slightly weaker as it does not incorporate attributes. However, given its simplicity and efficiency, we believe that it still serves as an effective baseline for attributed graph classification. Our graph representation is efficient (linear-time) to compute. We also provide a simple connection with the graph neural networks. Note that these observations are only for the task of graph classification while existing methods are often designed for a broader scope including node embedding and link prediction. The results are also likely biased due to the limited amount of benchmark datasets available. Nevertheless, the good performance of our simple baseline calls for the development of new, more comprehensive benchmark datasets so as to better evaluate and analyze different graph learning methods. Furthermore, given the computational efficiency of our graph summary, we believe that it is a good candidate as a baseline method for future graph classification (or even other graph learning) studies.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Graph-Conditioned Meta-Optimizer for QAOA Parameter Generation on Multiple Problem Classes

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    A graph-conditioned meta-optimizer learns QAOA parameter trajectories from one problem class and transfers them to others, yielding better initializations than standard methods in an empirical study of 64 settings.

  2. Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometric

    cs.LG 2019-03 accept novelty 7.0

    PyTorch Geometric is a PyTorch library that delivers fast graph neural network training through sparse GPU kernels and variable-size mini-batching.

  3. Graph Cascades: Contagion-Based Mesoscopic Rewiring for Structure-Aware Graph Machine Learning

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Graph Cascades uses contagion diffusion to rewire graphs by promoting reinforced multi-hop node pairs to direct neighbors, improving GNN performance on heterophilic and moderate-degree homophilic graphs under specifie...

  4. Learning to accelerate distributed ADMM using graph neural networks

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A GNN is trained to predict adaptive step sizes and weights for distributed ADMM by unrolling a fixed number of iterations and minimizing solution error on a problem class.

  5. Graph Contrastive Learning versus Untrained Baselines: The Role of Dataset Size

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    Graph contrastive learning's advantage over untrained and handcrafted baselines is size-dependent: baselines win on small datasets, GCL wins modestly past a few thousand graphs, then plateaus.

  6. Towards Faithful Graph Explanations with Synergistic Edge Effects via Granular Balls

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0

    SeeExplainer explains GNN predictions by decomposing graphs into granular balls and selecting substructures whose removal changes predictions, but its reported stability and fidelity advantages are largely definitiona...