Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Mixed electroweak-QCD corrections to $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^- H$ at CEPC with finite-width effect

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology · Submitted 13 Nov 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The mixed electroweak-QCD correction turns out to reach 1.5\% of the Born-order result, and thereby must be included in future confrontation with the data.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1811.05453 (version 2)
Pith IDVEQQBQGB, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationFeng Feng, Wen Chen, Wen-Long Sang, Yu Jia. "Mixed electroweak-QCD corrections to $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^- H$ at CEPC with finite-width effect." arXiv:1811.05453 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/VEQQBQGB
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,096 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.45 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.19 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.86 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The associated production of Higgs boson with a muon pair, $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^- H$, is one of the golden channels to pin down the properties of the Higgs boson in the prospective Higgs factories exemplified by \textsf{CEPC}. The projected accuracy of the corresponding cross section measurement is about per cent level at CEPC. In this work, we investigate both ${\mathcal O}(\alpha)$ weak correction and the ${\mathcal O}(\alpha\alpha_s)$ mixed electroweak-QCD corrections for this channel, appropriately taking into account the effect of finite $Z^0$ width. The $\mu^+\mu^-$ invariant mass spectrum is also predicted. The mixed electroweak-QCD correction turns out to reach 1.5\% of the Born-order result, and thereby must be included in future confrontation with the data. We also observe that, after including higher-order corrections, the simplified prediction for the integrated cross section employing the narrow-width-approximation may deviate from our full result by a few per cents.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The associated production of Higgs boson with a muon pair, $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^- H$, is one of the golden channels to pin down the properties of the Higgs boson in the prospective Higgs factories exemplified by \textsf{CEPC}. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 The projected accuracy of the corresponding cross section measurement is about per cent level at CEPC. background 0.98 0.08 0.03 asserted 0.73
s2 In this work, we investigate both ${\mathcal O}(\alpha)$ weak correction and the ${\mathcal O}(\alpha\alpha_s)$ mixed electroweak-QCD corrections for this channel, appropriately taking into account the effect of finite $Z^0$ width. contribution 0.94 0.94 0.08 asserted 0.96
s3 The $\mu^+\mu^-$ invariant mass spectrum is also predicted. contribution 0.63 0.89 0.03 asserted 1.00
s4 The mixed electroweak-QCD correction turns out to reach 1.5\% of the Born-order result, and thereby must be included in future confrontation with the data. result 0.92 0.96 0.72 asserted 1.00
s5 We also observe that, after including higher-order corrections, the simplified prediction for the integrated cross section employing the narrow-width-approximation may deviate from our full result by a few per cents. result 0.88 0.95 0.11 hedged possibility 0.91

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.94 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.88.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The associated production of Higgs boson with a muon pair, $e^+e^-\to \mu^+\mu^- H$, is one of the golden channels to pin down the properties of the Higgs boson in the prospective Higgs factories exemplified by \textsf{CEPC}. The projected accuracy of the corresponding cross section measurement is about per cent level at CEPC. In this work, we investigate both ${\mathcal O}(\alpha)$ weak correction and the ${\mathcal O}(\alpha\alpha_s)$ mixed electroweak-QCD corrections for this channel, appropriately taking into account the effect of finite $Z^0$ width. The $\mu^+\mu^-$ invariant mass spectrum is also predicted. The mixed electroweak-QCD correction turns out to reach 1.5\% of the Born-order result, and thereby must be included in future confrontation with the data. We also observe that, after including higher-order corrections, the simplified prediction for the integrated cross section employing the narrow-width-approximation may deviate from our full result by a few per cents.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

7 arXiv papers cite this in 7 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 2 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 5 papers

What it cites · 8 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 7 papers
Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 8 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.