Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Basis Pursuit Denoise with Nonsmooth Constraints

Optimization and Control · Submitted 28 Nov 2018

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The new methods are particularly promising for seismic applications, where the amplitude in the data varies significantly, and measurement noise in low-amplitude regions can wreak havoc for standard Gaussian error models.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.54 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1811.11633 (version 1)
Pith IDF2XLIXS3, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAleksandr Aravkin, Rajiv Kumar, Robert Baraldi. "Basis Pursuit Denoise with Nonsmooth Constraints." arXiv:1811.11633 (2018). https://pith.science/paper/F2XLIXS3
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,221 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.08 · states limitation 0.10 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.05 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.04 · compares with prior results 0.27 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Level-set optimization formulations with data-driven constraints minimize a regularization functional subject to matching observations to a given error level. These formulations are widely used, particularly for matrix completion and sparsity promotion in data interpolation and denoising. The misfit level is typically measured in the l2 norm, or other smooth metrics. In this paper, we present a new flexible algorithmic framework that targets nonsmooth level-set constraints, including L1, Linf, and even L0 norms. These constraints give greater flexibility for modeling deviations in observation and denoising, and have significant impact on the solution. Measuring error in the L1 and L0 norms makes the result more robust to large outliers, while matching many observations exactly. We demonstrate the approach for basis pursuit denoise (BPDN) problems as well as for extensions of BPDN to matrix factorization, with applications to interpolation and denoising of 5D seismic data. The new methods are particularly promising for seismic applications, where the amplitude in the data varies significantly, and measurement noise in low-amplitude regions can wreak havoc for standard Gaussian error models.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Level-set optimization formulations with data-driven constraints minimize a regularization functional subject to matching observations to a given error level. background 1.00 0.05 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 These formulations are widely used, particularly for matrix completion and sparsity promotion in data interpolation and denoising. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 The misfit level is typically measured in the l2 norm, or other smooth metrics. background 0.98 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.96
s3 In this paper, we present a new flexible algorithmic framework that targets nonsmooth level-set constraints, including L1, Linf, and even L0 norms. contribution 1.00 0.88 0.18 asserted 1.00
s4 These constraints give greater flexibility for modeling deviations in observation and denoising, and have significant impact on the solution. interpretation 0.71 0.23 0.18 asserted 1.00
s5 Measuring error in the L1 and L0 norms makes the result more robust to large outliers, while matching many observations exactly. interpretation 0.74 0.23 0.18 asserted 1.00
s6 We demonstrate the approach for basis pursuit denoise (BPDN) problems as well as for extensions of BPDN to matrix factorization, with applications to interpolation and denoising of 5D seismic data. contribution 0.91 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s7 The new methods are particularly promising for seismic applications, where the amplitude in the data varies significantly, and measurement noise in low-amplitude regions can wreak havoc for standard Gaussian error models. interpretation 0.89 0.26 0.25 hedged possibility 0.54

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.81.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Level-set optimization formulations with data-driven constraints minimize a regularization functional subject to matching observations to a given error level. These formulations are widely used, particularly for matrix completion and sparsity promotion in data interpolation and denoising. The misfit level is typically measured in the l2 norm, or other smooth metrics. In this paper, we present a new flexible algorithmic framework that targets nonsmooth level-set constraints, including L1, Linf, and even L0 norms. These constraints give greater flexibility for modeling deviations in observation and denoising, and have significant impact on the solution. Measuring error in the L1 and L0 norms makes the result more robust to large outliers, while matching many observations exactly. We demonstrate the approach for basis pursuit denoise (BPDN) problems as well as for extensions of BPDN to matrix factorization, with applications to interpolation and denoising of 5D seismic data. The new methods are particularly promising for seismic applications, where the amplitude in the data varies significantly, and measurement noise in low-amplitude regions can wreak havoc for standard Gaussian error models.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.