Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Comparing neural network based decoders for the surface code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1811.12456 v3 pith:X66DVJZM submitted 2018-11-29 quant-ph

Comparing neural network based decoders for the surface code

classification quant-ph
keywords decodinglevelneuralperformancedecoderdecodersnetworkparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Matching algorithms can be used for identifying errors in quantum systems, being the most famous the Blossom algorithm. Recent works have shown that small distance quantum error correction codes can be efficiently decoded by employing machine learning techniques based on neural networks (NN). Various NN-based decoders have been proposed to enhance the decoding performance and the decoding time. Their implementation differs in how the decoding is performed, at logical or physical level, as well as in several neural network related parameters. In this work, we implement and compare two NN-based decoders, a low level decoder and a high level decoder, and study how different NN parameters affect their decoding performance and execution time. Crucial parameters such as the size of the training dataset, the structure and the type of the neural network, and the learning rate used during training are discussed. After performing this comparison, we conclude that the high level decoder based on a Recurrent NN shows a better balance between decoding performance and execution time and it is much easier to train. We then test its decoding performance for different code distances, probability datasets and under the depolarizing and circuit error models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.