Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

ForensicTransfer: Weakly-supervised Domain Adaptation for Forgery Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.02510 v2 pith:EKVQXP6X submitted 2018-12-06 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords examplesapproachesfakeforgeryimageperformancerealunseen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Distinguishing manipulated from real images is becoming increasingly difficult as new sophisticated image forgery approaches come out by the day. Naive classification approaches based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) show excellent performance in detecting image manipulations when they are trained on a specific forgery method. However, on examples from unseen manipulation approaches, their performance drops significantly. To address this limitation in transferability, we introduce Forensic-Transfer (FT). We devise a learning-based forensic detector which adapts well to new domains, i.e., novel manipulation methods and can handle scenarios where only a handful of fake examples are available during training. To this end, we learn a forensic embedding based on a novel autoencoder-based architecture that can be used to distinguish between real and fake imagery. The learned embedding acts as a form of anomaly detector; namely, an image manipulated from an unseen method will be detected as fake provided it maps sufficiently far away from the cluster of real images. Comparing to prior works, FT shows significant improvements in transferability, which we demonstrate in a series of experiments on cutting-edge benchmarks. For instance, on unseen examples, we achieve up to 85% in terms of accuracy, and with only a handful of seen examples, our performance already reaches around 95%.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Practical Manipulation Model for Robust Deepfake Detection

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A data-augmentation method for deepfake detection that adds diverse pseudo-fakes and strong degradations during training, increasing robustness and low-quality benchmark AUC at a slight cost on clean high-quality data.

  2. InfoDense: Density-Aware Regional Decisive Replay for Memory-Efficient Incremental Face Forgery Detection

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    InfoDense replays only density-ranked, forgery-decisive face fragments rather than full images, cutting memory use and improving incremental deepfake detection.

  3. Perceptual Classifiers: Detecting Generative Images using Perceptual Features

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A two-layer classifier trained on CONTRIQUE image-quality features achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on GenImage and DRCT-2M fake-image detection benchmarks.

  4. Face Deepfakes -- A Comprehensive Review

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review of face deepfake generation and detection finds that off-the-shelf deepfake tools such as Wav2Lip and SimSwap achieve high attack success rates against lightweight face recognition models.

Pith tools