REVIEW
Guided Zoom: Questioning Network Evidence for Fine-grained Classification
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Guided Zoom: Questioning Network Evidence for Fine-grained Classification
read the original abstract
We propose Guided Zoom, an approach that utilizes spatial grounding of a model's decision to make more informed predictions. It does so by making sure the model has "the right reasons" for a prediction, defined as reasons that are coherent with those used to make similar correct decisions at training time. The reason/evidence upon which a deep convolutional neural network makes a prediction is defined to be the spatial grounding, in the pixel space, for a specific class conditional probability in the model output. Guided Zoom examines how reasonable such evidence is for each of the top-k predicted classes, rather than solely trusting the top-1 prediction. We show that Guided Zoom improves the classification accuracy of a deep convolutional neural network model and obtains state-of-the-art results on three fine-grained classification benchmark datasets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.