RECORD
Generalized no-hair theorems without horizons
General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology · Submitted 18 Jan 2019
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim This paper presents a systematic study of this question and illustrates that no-hair theorems are not restricted to spacetimes with event horizons but are instead characteristic of spacetimes with deep enough gravitational wells, extending Israel's theorem to static spacetimes without event horizons that contain small deviations from spherical symmetry.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The simplicity of black holes, as characterized by no-hair theorems, is one of the most important mathematical results in the framework of general relativity. Are these theorems unique to black hole spacetimes, or do they also constrain the geometry around regions of spacetime with arbitrarily large (although finite) redshift? This paper presents a systematic study of this question and illustrates that no-hair theorems are not restricted to spacetimes with event horizons but are instead characteristic of spacetimes with deep enough gravitational wells, extending Israel's theorem to static spacetimes without event horizons that contain small deviations from spherical symmetry. Instead of a uniqueness result, we obtain a theorem that constrains the allowed deviations from the Schwarzschild metric and guarantees that these deviations decrease with the maximum redshift of the gravitational well in the external vacuum region. Israel's theorem is recovered continuously in the limit of infinite redshift. This result provides a first extension of no-hair theorems to ultracompact stars, wormholes, and other exotic objects, and paves the way for the construction of similar results for stationary spacetimes describing rotating objects.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The simplicity of black holes, as characterized by no-hair theorems, is one of the most important mathematical results in the framework of general relativity. | background 1.00 | 0.04 | 0.02 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | Are these theorems unique to black hole spacetimes, or do they also constrain the geometry around regions of spacetime with arbitrarily large (although finite) redshift? | gap 0.84 | 0.04 | 0.03 | unclear 0.95 |
| s2 | This paper presents a systematic study of this question and illustrates that no-hair theorems are not restricted to spacetimes with event horizons but are instead characteristic of spacetimes with deep enough gravitational wells, extending Israel's theorem to static spacetimes without event horizons that contain small deviations from spherical symmetry. | contribution 0.62 | 0.95 | 0.92 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Instead of a uniqueness result, we obtain a theorem that constrains the allowed deviations from the Schwarzschild metric and guarantees that these deviations decrease with the maximum redshift of the gravitational well in the external vacuum region. | result 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.51 | asserted 1.00 |
| s4 | Israel's theorem is recovered continuously in the limit of infinite redshift. | result 0.72 | 0.81 | 0.11 | asserted 1.00 |
| s5 | This result provides a first extension of no-hair theorems to ultracompact stars, wormholes, and other exotic objects, and paves the way for the construction of similar results for stationary spacetimes describing rotating objects. | interpretation 0.77 | 0.70 | 0.15 | asserted 0.88 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The simplicity of black holes, as characterized by no-hair theorems, is one of the most important mathematical results in the framework of general relativity. Are these theorems unique to black hole spacetimes, or do they also constrain the geometry around regions of spacetime with arbitrarily large (although finite) redshift? This paper presents a systematic study of this question and illustrates that no-hair theorems are not restricted to spacetimes with event horizons but are instead characteristic of spacetimes with deep enough gravitational wells, extending Israel's theorem to static spacetimes without event horizons that contain small deviations from spherical symmetry. Instead of a uniqueness result, we obtain a theorem that constrains the allowed deviations from the Schwarzschild metric and guarantees that these deviations decrease with the maximum redshift of the gravitational well in the external vacuum region. Israel's theorem is recovered continuously in the limit of infinite redshift. This result provides a first extension of no-hair theorems to ultracompact stars, wormholes, and other exotic objects, and paves the way for the construction of similar results for stationary spacetimes describing rotating objects.
Human review
References
How the literature uses it
6 arXiv papers cite this in 10 sentences
Papers citing it · 6 sentences without a confident label
Compares with it 1 paper
-
In the domains of validity where our analyses intersect with thosein [ref] and [ref] , we find essentially the same results: that deviations from sphericity have to die off with powers of the compactness parameter.
No-hair and almost-no-hair results for static axisymmetric black holes and ultracompact objects in astrophysical environments · Discussion and conclusions · 0.99
Cites it as background 2 papers
-
ECOs may potentially exhibit deviations from the Kerr metric [ref] .
Tidal heating as a discriminator for horizons in equatorial eccentric extreme mass ratio inspirals · Discussion · 0.80
-
The uniqueness theorem [ref] tells us that curved spacetime described by Kerr-Newman(KN) metric in the Einstein-Maxwell gravitational theory can hold at most three global conserved quantities, which are named as mass, electric charge and angular momentum.
The fastest relaxation rate of higher-dimensional Reissner--Nordstr\"{o}m black hole · Introduction · 0.98
What it cites · 17 sentences without a confident label
Compares with 2 papers
-
During the last stages of the preparation of this manuscript, we noticed the existence of the recent work [ref] that deals with the same problem but from a different perspective, and using a different approach (namely, constructing explicitly a family of geometries that include perturbative deviations from the Schwarzschild solution).
Exotic compact objects with soft hair · Implications and conclusions · 0.92
-
Also, the paper [ref] is related to some of the ideas discussed here, focusing its discussion instead on some of the possible implications that a different multipolar structure would have for gravitational waves.
How well can ultracompact bodies imitate black hole ringdowns? · Implications and conclusions · 0.85
Cites as background 8 papers
-
There are still many aspects to be understood regarding these theorems, from mathematical technicalities [ref] to the study of their interplay with observations [ref] .
Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Observations of Black Holes in the Electromagnetic Spectrum · Introduction · 0.99
-
There are still many aspects to be understood regarding these theorems, from mathematical technicalities [ref] to the study of their interplay with observations [ref] .
Testing the no-hair theorem with the continuum-fitting and the iron line methods: a short review · Introduction · 0.99
-
There are still many aspects to be understood regarding these theorems, from mathematical technicalities [ref] to the study of their interplay with observations [ref] .
Challenges testing the no-hair theorem with gravitational waves · Introduction · 0.99
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.