pith. sign in

arxiv: 1901.06566 · v1 · pith:6U7XYL7Unew · submitted 2019-01-19 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.NE· stat.ML

Overfitting Mechanism and Avoidance in Deep Neural Networks

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.NEstat.ML
keywords algorithmsamplestrainingdeepmodelsneuralonesoverfitting
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Assisted by the availability of data and high performance computing, deep learning techniques have achieved breakthroughs and surpassed human performance empirically in difficult tasks, including object recognition, speech recognition, and natural language processing. As they are being used in critical applications, understanding underlying mechanisms for their successes and limitations is imperative. In this paper, we show that overfitting, one of the fundamental issues in deep neural networks, is due to continuous gradient updating and scale sensitiveness of cross entropy loss. By separating samples into correctly and incorrectly classified ones, we show that they behave very differently, where the loss decreases in the correct ones and increases in the incorrect ones. Furthermore, by analyzing dynamics during training, we propose a consensus-based classification algorithm that enables us to avoid overfitting and significantly improve the classification accuracy especially when the number of training samples is limited. As each trained neural network depends on extrinsic factors such as initial values as well as training data, requiring consensus among multiple models reduces extrinsic factors substantially; for statistically independent models, the reduction is exponential. Compared to ensemble algorithms, the proposed algorithm avoids overgeneralization by not classifying ambiguous inputs. Systematic experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. For example, using only 1000 training samples from MNIST dataset, the proposed algorithm achieves 95% accuracy, significantly higher than any of the individual models, with 90% of the test samples classified.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Sharpness-Aware Minimization with Z-Score Gradient Filtering

    cs.LG 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Z-Score Filtered SAM retains only high absolute Z-score gradient components per layer during the ascent step and reports higher test accuracy than standard SAM on CIFAR and Tiny-ImageNet benchmarks.