Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Experimental comparison of tomography and self-testing in certifying entanglement

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1901.10127 v2 pith:AFCMLRCY submitted 2019-01-29 quant-ph

Experimental comparison of tomography and self-testing in certifying entanglement

classification quant-ph
keywords self-testingestimatedmethodstomographyfluctuationshighallegedlyanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We assess the quality of a source of allegedly pure two-qubit states using both standard tomography and methods inspired by device-independent self-testing. Even when the detection and locality loopholes are open, the latter methods can dispense with modelling of the system and the measurements. However, due to finite sample fluctuations, the estimated probability distribution usually does not satisfy the no-signaling conditions exactly. We implement data analysis that is robust against these fluctuations. We demonstrate a high ratio $f_s/f_t\approx 0.988$ between the fidelity estimated from self-testing and that estimated from full tomography, proving high performance of self-testing methods.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.