Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Make Analogies by Contrasting Abstract Relational Structure

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.00120 v1 pith:TNSVUOEV submitted 2019-01-31 cs.AI

Learning to Make Analogies by Contrasting Abstract Relational Structure

classification cs.AI
keywords abstractanalogicaldatalearnreasoningrelationalanalogiesanalogy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Analogical reasoning has been a principal focus of various waves of AI research. Analogy is particularly challenging for machines because it requires relational structures to be represented such that they can be flexibly applied across diverse domains of experience. Here, we study how analogical reasoning can be induced in neural networks that learn to perceive and reason about raw visual data. We find that the critical factor for inducing such a capacity is not an elaborate architecture, but rather, careful attention to the choice of data and the manner in which it is presented to the model. The most robust capacity for analogical reasoning is induced when networks learn analogies by contrasting abstract relational structures in their input domains, a training method that uses only the input data to force models to learn about important abstract features. Using this technique we demonstrate capacities for complex, visual and symbolic analogy making and generalisation in even the simplest neural network architectures.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quo Vadis, Visual In-Context Learning? A Unified Benchmark Across Domains and Tasks

    cs.CV 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper constructs the VIBE benchmark and evaluates six visual in-context learning models on 14 datasets, 12 tasks, and 106 combinations under a unified one-shot protocol, revealing limitations and failure modes.