Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Proper time in atom interferometers: Diffractive versus specular mirrors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.01188 v1 pith:FISAX53L submitted 2019-02-04 quant-ph gr-qcphysics.atom-ph

Enno Giese , Alexander Friedrich , Fabio Di Pumpo , Albert Roura , Wolfgang P. Schleich , Daniel M. Greenberger , Ernst M. Rasel This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phgr-qcphysics.atom-ph
keywords mirrorsdiffractivespecularatominterferometerpropertimearrangement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We compare a conventional Mach-Zehnder light-pulse atom interferometer based on diffractive mirrors with one that uses specular reflection. In contrast to diffractive mirrors that generate a symmetric configuration, specular mirrors realized, for example, by evanescent fields lead under the influence of gravity to an asymmetric geometry. In such an arrangement the interferometer phase contains nonrelativistic signatures of proper time.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools