REVIEW 2 cited by
Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Maps
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Saliency Map, the gradient of the score function with respect to the input, is the most basic technique for interpreting deep neural network decisions. However, saliency maps are often visually noisy. Although several hypotheses were proposed to account for this phenomenon, there are few works that provide rigorous analyses of noisy saliency maps. In this paper, we firstly propose a new hypothesis that noise may occur in saliency maps when irrelevant features pass through ReLU activation functions. Then, we propose Rectified Gradient, a method that alleviates this problem through layer-wise thresholding during backpropagation. Experiments with neural networks trained on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet showed effectiveness of our method and its superiority to other attribution methods.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
On Spectral Properties of Gradient-based Explanation Methods
Gradient-based explanations behave like frequency-band selectors: the gradient acts as a high-pass filter, perturbation as a low-pass filter, and their combination creates explanations that shift with the perturbation scale.
-
On the Complexity-Faithfulness Trade-off of Gradient-Based Explanations
The paper introduces EF and ΔEF as spectral metrics, but ΔEF is derived from EF, making the complexity-faithfulness trade-off partly tautological.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.