Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imaging

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1902.07208 v3 pith:PMTOWHSI submitted 2019-02-14 cs.CV cs.LGstat.ML

classification cs.CVcs.LGstat.ML
keywords transferlearningmedicalimagingfeaturemodelsdifferencesexplore
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transfer learning from natural image datasets, particularly ImageNet, using standard large models and corresponding pretrained weights has become a de-facto method for deep learning applications to medical imaging. However, there are fundamental differences in data sizes, features and task specifications between natural image classification and the target medical tasks, and there is little understanding of the effects of transfer. In this paper, we explore properties of transfer learning for medical imaging. A performance evaluation on two large scale medical imaging tasks shows that surprisingly, transfer offers little benefit to performance, and simple, lightweight models can perform comparably to ImageNet architectures. Investigating the learned representations and features, we find that some of the differences from transfer learning are due to the over-parametrization of standard models rather than sophisticated feature reuse. We isolate where useful feature reuse occurs, and outline the implications for more efficient model exploration. We also explore feature independent benefits of transfer arising from weight scalings.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fine-Tuning Regimes Define Distinct Continual Learning Problems

    cs.LG 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The relative rankings of continual learning methods are not preserved across different fine-tuning regimes defined by trainable parameter depth.

  2. Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Source-dataset selection for medical transfer learning is driven by community practice and perceived similarity, and 'more similar is better' does not consistently hold.

  3. XAI-Guided Analysis of Residual Networks for Interpretable Pneumonia Detection in Paediatric Chest X-rays

    eess.IV 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A fine-tuned ResNet-50 with Grad-CAM and Monte Carlo dropout reports 95.94% accuracy and 98.91% AUC for pediatric pneumonia on the Kermany chest X-ray dataset.

Pith tools