REVIEW 1 cited by
Active and Semi-Supervised Learning in ASR: Benefits on the Acoustic and Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Active and Semi-Supervised Learning in ASR: Benefits on the Acoustic and Language Models
read the original abstract
The goal of this paper is to simulate the benefits of jointly applying active learning (AL) and semi-supervised training (SST) in a new speech recognition application. Our data selection approach relies on confidence filtering, and its impact on both the acoustic and language models (AM and LM) is studied. While AL is known to be beneficial to AM training, we show that it also carries out substantial improvements to the LM when combined with SST. Sophisticated confidence models, on the other hand, did not prove to yield any data selection gain. Our results indicate that, while SST is crucial at the beginning of the labeling process, its gains degrade rapidly as AL is set in place. The final simulation reports that AL allows a transcription cost reduction of about 70% over random selection. Alternatively, for a fixed transcription budget, the proposed approach improves the word error rate by about 12.5% relative.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Leveraging Beam Search Information for Confidence Estimation in E2E ASR
A 0.6k-parameter module that scores ASR tokens and words using only beam-search scores, ranks, context sums, and top-k alternatives substantially reduces calibration error, especially worst-case MCE.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.