Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep learning observables in computational fluid dynamics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.03040 v2 pith:POQ6KHYH submitted 2019-03-07 physics.comp-ph cs.LGcs.NAmath.NAphysics.flu-dynstat.ML

classification physics.comp-phcs.LGcs.NAmath.NAphysics.flu-dynstat.ML
keywords deeplearningnetworkcarlocomputationalnetworksneuralnumerical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Many large scale problems in computational fluid dynamics such as uncertainty quantification, Bayesian inversion, data assimilation and PDE constrained optimization are considered very challenging computationally as they require a large number of expensive (forward) numerical solutions of the corresponding PDEs. We propose a machine learning algorithm, based on deep artificial neural networks, that predicts the underlying \emph{input parameters to observable} map from a few training samples (computed realizations of this map). By a judicious combination of theoretical arguments and empirical observations, we find suitable network architectures and training hyperparameters that result in robust and efficient neural network approximations of the parameters to observable map. Numerical experiments are presented to demonstrate low prediction errors for the trained network networks, even when the network has been trained with a few samples, at a computational cost which is several orders of magnitude lower than the underlying PDE solver. Moreover, we combine the proposed deep learning algorithm with Monte Carlo (MC) and Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods to efficiently compute uncertainty propagation for nonlinear PDEs. Under the assumption that the underlying neural networks generalize well, we prove that the deep learning MC and QMC algorithms are guaranteed to be faster than the baseline (quasi-) Monte Carlo methods. Numerical experiments demonstrating one to two orders of magnitude speed up over baseline QMC and MC algorithms, for the intricate problem of computing probability distributions of the observable, are also presented.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Deep neural network approximations for Monte Carlo algorithms

    math.NA 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A general theorem shows that neural networks inherit the absence of the curse of dimensionality from any discrete Monte Carlo scheme they can emulate, with applications to Kolmogorov PDEs.

  2. Space-time error estimates for deep neural network approximations for differential equations

    math.NA 2019-08 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proves the first space-time error estimates for deep ReLU network approximations of Euler approximations of perturbed differential equations.

Pith tools