Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Improving Skin Condition Classification with a Visual Symptom Checker Trained using Reinforcement Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.03495 v4 pith:BTLJKMGQ submitted 2019-03-08 cs.AI

Improving Skin Condition Classification with a Visual Symptom Checker Trained using Reinforcement Learning

classification cs.AI
keywords visualapproachaccuracyagentaskedcheckerconditioninformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present a visual symptom checker that combines a pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent as a Question Answering (QA) model. This method increases the classification confidence and accuracy of the visual symptom checker, and decreases the average number of questions asked to narrow down the differential diagnosis. A Deep Q-Network (DQN)-based RL agent learns how to ask the patient about the presence of symptoms in order to maximize the probability of correctly identifying the underlying condition. The RL agent uses the visual information provided by CNN in addition to the answers to the asked questions to guide the QA system. We demonstrate that the RL-based approach increases the accuracy more than 20% compared to the CNN-only approach, which only uses the visual information to predict the condition. Moreover, the increased accuracy is up to 10% compared to the approach that uses the visual information provided by CNN along with a conventional decision tree-based QA system. We finally show that the RL-based approach not only outperforms the decision tree-based approach, but also narrows down the diagnosis faster in terms of the average number of asked questions.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.