Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Weighting gates in circuit complexity and holography

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.06156 v3 pith:H2ZUHXU2 submitted 2019-03-14 hep-th quant-ph

classification hep-thquant-ph
keywords complexitycircuitweightinggatescertaincostfactorfield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Motivated by recent studies of quantum computational complexity in quantum field theory and holography, we discuss how weighting certain classes of gates building up a quantum circuit more heavily than others does affect the complexity. Utilizing Nielsen's geometric approach to circuit complexity, we investigate the effects for a regulated field theory for which the optimal circuit is a representation of $GL(N,\mathbb{R})$. More precisely, we work out how a uniformly chosen weighting factor acting on the entangling gates affects the complexity and, particularly, its divergent behavior. We show that assigning a higher cost to the entangling gates increases the complexity. Employing the penalized and the unpenalized complexities for the $\mathcal{F}_{\kappa=2}$ cost, we further find an interesting relation between the latter and the one based on the unpenalized $\mathcal{F}_{\kappa=1}$ cost. In addition, we exhibit how imposing such penalties modifies the leading order UV divergence in the complexity. We show that appropriately tuning the gate weighting eliminates the additional logarithmic factor, thus, resulting in a simple power law scaling. We also compare the circuit complexity with holographic predictions, specifically, based on the complexity=action conjecture, and relate the weighting factor to certain bulk quantities. Finally, we comment on certain expectations concerning the role of gate penalties in defining complexity in field theory and also speculate on possible implications for holography.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Complexity measures in QFT and constrained geometric actions

    hep-th 2019-08 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    The authors claim to rule out inhomogeneous complexity costs such as F_kappa and F_sigma^2 and to single out F_⟨H^2⟩ as the canonical complexity measure, but the no-go proof is incomplete.

  2. Reflections on Virasoro circuit complexity and Berry phase

    hep-th 2019-08 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    A claimed identification of Virasoro circuit complexity with the Berry connection fails a basic consistency check for pure rotations.

Pith tools