Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Complex time, shredded propagator method for large-scale GW calculations

Computational Physics · Submitted 18 Apr 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The resulting cubic scaling GW method has a sufficiently small prefactor to outperform standard quartic scaling methods on small systems ($\gtrapprox$ 10 atoms) and also represents a substantial improvement over other cubic methods tested for all system sizes studied.

how it is stated · asserted 0.99 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1904.10512 (version 1)
Pith IDUZC6ZVIG, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationGlenn J. Martyna, Minjung Kim, Sohrab Ismail-Beigi. "Complex time, shredded propagator method for large-scale GW calculations." arXiv:1904.10512 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/UZC6ZVIG
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,023 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.06 · states limitation 0.27 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.37 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.90 · compares with prior results 0.94 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The GW method is a many-body electronic structure technique capable of generating accurate quasiparticle properties for realistic systems spanning physics, chemistry, and materials science. Despite its power, GW is not routinely applied to large complex assemblies due to its large computational overhead and quartic scaling with particle number. Here, the GW equations are recast, exactly, as Fourier-Laplace time integrals over complex time propagators. The propagators are then "shredded" via energy partitioning and the time integrals approximated in a controlled manner using generalized Gaussian quadrature(s) while discrete variable methods are employed to represent the required propagators in real-space. The resulting cubic scaling GW method has a sufficiently small prefactor to outperform standard quartic scaling methods on small systems ($\gtrapprox$ 10 atoms) and also represents a substantial improvement over other cubic methods tested for all system sizes studied. The approach can be applied to any theoretical framework containing large sums of terms with energy differences in the denominator.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The GW method is a many-body electronic structure technique capable of generating accurate quasiparticle properties for realistic systems spanning physics, chemistry, and materials science. background 1.00 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s1 Despite its power, GW is not routinely applied to large complex assemblies due to its large computational overhead and quartic scaling with particle number. background 0.67 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Here, the GW equations are recast, exactly, as Fourier-Laplace time integrals over complex time propagators. method 0.61 0.92 0.08 asserted 1.00
s3 The propagators are then "shredded" via energy partitioning and the time integrals approximated in a controlled manner using generalized Gaussian quadrature(s) while discrete variable methods are employed to represent the required propagators in real-space. method 0.99 0.91 0.07 asserted 1.00
s4 The resulting cubic scaling GW method has a sufficiently small prefactor to outperform standard quartic scaling methods on small systems ($\gtrapprox$ 10 atoms) and also represents a substantial improvement over other cubic methods tested for all system sizes studied. result 0.97 0.91 0.75 asserted 0.99
s5 The approach can be applied to any theoretical framework containing large sums of terms with energy differences in the denominator. interpretation 0.86 0.38 0.07 asserted 0.74

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.84.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The GW method is a many-body electronic structure technique capable of generating accurate quasiparticle properties for realistic systems spanning physics, chemistry, and materials science. Despite its power, GW is not routinely applied to large complex assemblies due to its large computational overhead and quartic scaling with particle number. Here, the GW equations are recast, exactly, as Fourier-Laplace time integrals over complex time propagators. The propagators are then "shredded" via energy partitioning and the time integrals approximated in a controlled manner using generalized Gaussian quadrature(s) while discrete variable methods are employed to represent the required propagators in real-space. The resulting cubic scaling GW method has a sufficiently small prefactor to outperform standard quartic scaling methods on small systems ($\gtrapprox$ 10 atoms) and also represents a substantial improvement over other cubic methods tested for all system sizes studied. The approach can be applied to any theoretical framework containing large sums of terms with energy differences in the denominator.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.