Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

The Host-Galaxy Properties of Type 1 Versus Type 2 Active Galactic Nuclei

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.13286 v1 pith:ZM3XKRRG submitted 2019-04-30 astro-ph.GA

The Host-Galaxy Properties of Type 1 Versus Type 2 Active Galactic Nuclei

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords typeagnsstarsimilarfindhosthost-galaxymodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
abstract

The unified model of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) proposes that different AGN optical spectral types are caused by different viewing angles with respect to an obscuring 'torus'. Therefore, this model predicts that type 1 and type 2 AGNs should have similar host-galaxy properties. We investigate this prediction with 2463 X-ray selected AGNs in the COSMOS field. We divide our sample into type 1 and type 2 AGNs based on their spectra, morphologies, and variability. We derive their host-galaxy stellar masses ($M_\star$) through SED fitting, and find that the host $M_\star$ of type 1 AGNs tend to be slightly smaller than those of type 2 AGNs by $\Delta\overline{\mathrm{log}M_\star}\approx0.2~\mathrm{dex}$ ($\approx 4\sigma$ significance). Besides deriving star-formation rates (SFRs) from SED fitting, we also utilize far-infrared (FIR) photometry and a stacking method to obtain FIR-based SFRs. We find that the SFRs of type 1 and type 2 sources are similar once their redshifts and X-ray luminosities are controlled. We also investigate cosmic environment, and find that the surface number densities (sub-Mpc) and cosmic-web environments ($\approx 1\text{--}10$~Mpc) are similar for both populations. In summary, our analyses show that the host galaxies of type 1 and type 2 AGNs have similar SFR and cosmic environment in general, but the former tend to have lower $M_\star$ than the latter. The difference in $M_\star$ indicates that the AGN unification model is not strictly correct and both host galaxy and torus may contribute to the optical obscuration of AGNs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. AGN radiative feedback as the main regulator of [O III] outflow activity and obscuration in X-ray AGN

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 accept novelty 6.5

    AGN radiation pressure, not black-hole mass, simultaneously boosts large-scale [O III] outflows and clears circumnuclear gas as Eddington ratio rises.

  2. AGN radiative feedback as the main regulator of [O III] outflow activity and obscuration in X-ray AGN

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Higher Eddington ratio AGN exhibit increased [O III] outflow incidence and reduced obscuration, supporting radiative feedback as the regulator.