Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Bayesian evidence for $\alpha$-attractor dark energy models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.00834 v2 pith:IDJBWAFT submitted 2019-05-02 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th
keywords modelalphadatamodelsanalysisattractorbayesiandark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

Dark energy models with tracker properties have gained attention due to the large range of initial conditions leading to the current value of the dark energy density parameter. A well-motivated family of these models are the so-called $\alpha$-attractors, which show the late time behavior of a cosmological constant. In the present paper we perform a model-selection analysis of a variety of $\alpha$-attractor potentials in comparison with a non-flat $\Lambda$CDM model. Specifically, we compute the Bayes Factor for the L-Model, the Oscillatory Tracker Model, the Recliner Model, and the Starobinsky Model, while considering the non-flat $\Lambda$CDM as the base model. Each model is tested through a Bayesian analysis using observations relevant to the current accelerated expansion: we employ the latest SNe Ia data, combined with cosmic clocks, the latest BOSS release of BAO data, and the Planck Compressed 2018 data. The produced Markov Chains for each model are further compared through a Bayesian evidence analysis. From the latter we conclude that the Oscillatory Tracker Model is preferred by data (even if weakly) over the non-flat $\Lambda$CDM model. Our results also suggest at the L-model is the least favoured version of the $\alpha$-attractor models considered.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The apparent preference for evolving dark energy depends strongly on which supernova catalog and which BAO survey are used, and is not robust across all independent data combinations.

Pith tools