Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Information asymmetry in KL-regularized RL

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.01240 v1 pith:CZ2PDPLE submitted 2019-05-03 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords policydefaultinformationlearnlearningrepeatedspeedstructure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many real world tasks exhibit rich structure that is repeated across different parts of the state space or in time. In this work we study the possibility of leveraging such repeated structure to speed up and regularize learning. We start from the KL regularized expected reward objective which introduces an additional component, a default policy. Instead of relying on a fixed default policy, we learn it from data. But crucially, we restrict the amount of information the default policy receives, forcing it to learn reusable behaviors that help the policy learn faster. We formalize this strategy and discuss connections to information bottleneck approaches and to the variational EM algorithm. We present empirical results in both discrete and continuous action domains and demonstrate that, for certain tasks, learning a default policy alongside the policy can significantly speed up and improve learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Offline Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Trajectory Classification

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    TraC trains an offline safe RL policy by classifying trajectories as desirable (safe, high-reward) versus undesirable (unsafe or low-reward) using a logistic loss on a policy-ratio score.

Pith tools