Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Parallel implementation of w-projection wide-field imaging

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics · Submitted 8 May 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The experimental results show that the total runtime of both MPI + OpenMP and MPI + CUDA methods is significantly shorter than that of single-thread processing.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1905.03213 (version 1)
Pith IDSMNFOAKT, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAng Yu, Baoqiang Lao, Junyi Wang, Quan Guo, Shaoguang Guo, Tao An, Wenhui Zhang, Xiaocong Wu. "Parallel implementation of w-projection wide-field imaging." arXiv:1905.03213 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/SMNFOAKT
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,581 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.70 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.86 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.88 · compares with prior results 0.91 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

w-Projection is a wide-field imaging technique that is widely used in radio synthesis arrays. Processing the wide-field big data generated by the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will require significant updates to current methods to significantly reduce the time consumed on data processing. Data loading and gridding are found to be two major time-consuming tasks in w-projection. In this paper, we investigate two parallel methods of accelerating w-projection processing on multiple nodes: the hybrid Message Passing Interface (MPI) and Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP) method based on multicore Central Processing Units (CPUs) and the hybrid MPI and Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) method based on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). Both methods are successfully employed and operated in various computational environments, confirming their robustness. The experimental results show that the total runtime of both MPI + OpenMP and MPI + CUDA methods is significantly shorter than that of single-thread processing. MPI + CUDA generally shows faster performance when running on multiple nodes than MPI + OpenMP, especially on large numbers of nodes. The single-precision GPU-based processing yields faster computation than the double-precision processing; while the single- and doubleprecision CPU-based processing shows consistent computational performance. The gridding time remarkably increases when the support size of the convolution kernel is larger than 8 and the image size is larger than 2,048 pixels. The present research offers useful guidance for developing SKA imaging pipelines.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 w-Projection is a wide-field imaging technique that is widely used in radio synthesis arrays. background 1.00 0.03 0.01 asserted 1.00
s1 Processing the wide-field big data generated by the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will require significant updates to current methods to significantly reduce the time consumed on data processing. background 0.90 0.07 0.03 asserted 0.91
s2 Data loading and gridding are found to be two major time-consuming tasks in w-projection. background 0.80 0.73 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 In this paper, we investigate two parallel methods of accelerating w-projection processing on multiple nodes: the hybrid Message Passing Interface (MPI) and Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP) method based on multicore Central Processing Units (CPUs) and the hybrid MPI and Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) method based on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). contribution 0.58 0.85 0.05 asserted 0.95
s4 Both methods are successfully employed and operated in various computational environments, confirming their robustness. result 0.97 0.87 0.08 asserted 1.00
s5 The experimental results show that the total runtime of both MPI + OpenMP and MPI + CUDA methods is significantly shorter than that of single-thread processing. result 1.00 0.95 0.37 asserted 1.00
s6 MPI + CUDA generally shows faster performance when running on multiple nodes than MPI + OpenMP, especially on large numbers of nodes. result 1.00 0.93 0.37 asserted 0.99
s7 The single-precision GPU-based processing yields faster computation than the double-precision processing; while the single- and doubleprecision CPU-based processing shows consistent computational performance. result 1.00 0.91 0.10 asserted 1.00
s8 The gridding time remarkably increases when the support size of the convolution kernel is larger than 8 and the image size is larger than 2,048 pixels. result 0.96 0.87 0.06 asserted 1.00
s9 The present research offers useful guidance for developing SKA imaging pipelines. interpretation 0.85 0.31 0.13 asserted 0.77

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 0.94 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.81.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

w-Projection is a wide-field imaging technique that is widely used in radio synthesis arrays. Processing the wide-field big data generated by the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will require significant updates to current methods to significantly reduce the time consumed on data processing. Data loading and gridding are found to be two major time-consuming tasks in w-projection. In this paper, we investigate two parallel methods of accelerating w-projection processing on multiple nodes: the hybrid Message Passing Interface (MPI) and Open Multi-Processing (OpenMP) method based on multicore Central Processing Units (CPUs) and the hybrid MPI and Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) method based on Graphics Processing Units (GPUs). Both methods are successfully employed and operated in various computational environments, confirming their robustness. The experimental results show that the total runtime of both MPI + OpenMP and MPI + CUDA methods is significantly shorter than that of single-thread processing. MPI + CUDA generally shows faster performance when running on multiple nodes than MPI + OpenMP, especially on large numbers of nodes. The single-precision GPU-based processing yields faster computation than the double-precision processing; while the single- and doubleprecision CPU-based processing shows consistent computational performance. The gridding time remarkably increases when the support size of the convolution kernel is larger than 8 and the image size is larger than 2,048 pixels. The present research offers useful guidance for developing SKA imaging pipelines.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 4 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.