REVIEW 1 cited by
Implicit Filter Sparsification In Convolutional Neural Networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We show implicit filter level sparsity manifests in convolutional neural networks (CNNs) which employ Batch Normalization and ReLU activation, and are trained with adaptive gradient descent techniques and L2 regularization or weight decay. Through an extensive empirical study (Mehta et al., 2019) we hypothesize the mechanism behind the sparsification process, and find surprising links to certain filter sparsification heuristics proposed in literature. Emergence of, and the subsequent pruning of selective features is observed to be one of the contributing mechanisms, leading to feature sparsity at par or better than certain explicit sparsification / pruning approaches. In this workshop article we summarize our findings, and point out corollaries of selective-featurepenalization which could also be employed as heuristics for filter pruning
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
ProfilingAgent: Profiling-Guided Agentic Reasoning for Adaptive Model Optimization
An LLM-driven multi-agent system picks layer-wise pruning and dynamic quantization decisions from profiling traces, achieving large memory savings on transformer models but only modest, weakly benchmarked pruning gains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.