Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Meta reinforcement learning as task inference

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.06424 v2 pith:TWL6Y3U6 submitted 2019-05-15 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords learningtaskbeliefagentideainformationmdpsmeta
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Humans achieve efficient learning by relying on prior knowledge about the structure of naturally occurring tasks. There is considerable interest in designing reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms with similar properties. This includes proposals to learn the learning algorithm itself, an idea also known as meta learning. One formal interpretation of this idea is as a partially observable multi-task RL problem in which task information is hidden from the agent. Such unknown task problems can be reduced to Markov decision processes (MDPs) by augmenting an agent's observations with an estimate of the belief about the task based on past experience. However estimating the belief state is intractable in most partially-observed MDPs. We propose a method that separately learns the policy and the task belief by taking advantage of various kinds of privileged information. Our approach can be very effective at solving standard meta-RL environments, as well as a complex continuous control environment with sparse rewards and requiring long-term memory.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 63 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty Prioritized Experience Replay

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    UPER uses ensemble-based epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty to compute an information gain priority for experience replay, outperforming TD-error prioritization on Atari-57.

Pith tools