Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Axial Vector Form Factors from Lattice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.06470 v2 pith:H7VAGAR4 submitted 2019-05-15 hep-lat

Axial Vector Form Factors from Lattice QCD that Satisfy the PCAC Relation

classification hep-lat
keywords axialformfactorslatticemasspcacexcitedextraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Previous lattice QCD calculations of axial vector and pseudoscalar form factors show significant deviation from the partially conserved axial current (PCAC) relation between them. Since the original correlation functions satisfy PCAC, the observed deviations from the operator identity cast doubt on whether all the systematics in the extraction of form factors from the correlation functions are under control. We identify the problematic systematic as a missed excited state, whose energy as a function of the momentum transfer squared, $Q^2$, is determined from the analysis of the 3-point functions themselves. Its mass is much smaller than those of the excited states previously considered and including it impacts the extraction of all the ground state matrix elements. The form factors extracted using these mass/energy gaps satisfy PCAC and other consistency conditions, and validate the pion-pole dominance hypothesis. We also show that the extraction of the axial charge $g_A$ is very sensitive to the value of the mass gaps of the excited states used and current lattice data do not provide an unambiguous determination of these, unlike the $Q^2 \neq 0$ case. To highlight the differences and improvement between the conventional versus the new analysis strategy, we present a comparison of results obtained on a physical pion mass ensemble at $a\approx 0.0871\,\mathrm{fm}$. With the new strategy, we find $g_A = 1.30(6)$. A very significant improvement over previous lattice results is found for the axial charge radius $r_A = 0.74(6)\,\mathrm{fm}$, extracted using the $z$-expansion to parameterize the $Q^2$ behavior of $G_A(Q^2)$, and $g_P^\ast = 8.06(44)$ obtained using the pion pole-dominance ansatz to fit the $Q^2$ behavior of the induced pseudoscalar form factor $\widetilde{G}_P(Q^2)$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Elastic and resonance structures of the nucleon from hadronic tensor in lattice QCD: implications for neutrino-nucleon scattering and hadron physics

    hep-lat 2023-11 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Lattice QCD computation of hadronic tensor yields consistent nucleon Sachs electric form factor and extracts transition form factors to the Roper resonance region for inclusive cross sections.

  2. The strange and flavor-singlet axial form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD

    hep-lat 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Lattice QCD yields the singlet axial form factor G_A^{u+d+s}(Q^2) and strange G_A^s(Q^2) with full error budget after chiral, continuum, and infinite-volume extrapolations.

  3. Nucleon axial-vector form factor and radius from radiatively-corrected antineutrino scattering data

    hep-ph 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Radiative corrections applied to MINERvA antineutrino data yield updated values for the nucleon axial-vector form factor G_A and axial radius.