pith. sign in

arxiv: 1905.06731 · v1 · pith:XTEDEWN7new · submitted 2019-05-16 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.ML

BrainTorrent: A Peer-to-Peer Environment for Decentralized Federated Learning

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.ML
keywords datacentralbraintorrentmedicalmodeltrainingcentersclients
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Access to sufficient annotated data is a common challenge in training deep neural networks on medical images. As annotating data is expensive and time-consuming, it is difficult for an individual medical center to reach large enough sample sizes to build their own, personalized models. As an alternative, data from all centers could be pooled to train a centralized model that everyone can use. However, such a strategy is often infeasible due to the privacy-sensitive nature of medical data. Recently, federated learning (FL) has been introduced to collaboratively learn a shared prediction model across centers without the need for sharing data. In FL, clients are locally training models on site-specific datasets for a few epochs and then sharing their model weights with a central server, which orchestrates the overall training process. Importantly, the sharing of models does not compromise patient privacy. A disadvantage of FL is the dependence on a central server, which requires all clients to agree on one trusted central body, and whose failure would disrupt the training process of all clients. In this paper, we introduce BrainTorrent, a new FL framework without a central server, particularly targeted towards medical applications. BrainTorrent presents a highly dynamic peer-to-peer environment, where all centers directly interact with each other without depending on a central body. We demonstrate the overall effectiveness of FL for the challenging task of whole brain segmentation and observe that the proposed server-less BrainTorrent approach does not only outperform the traditional server-based one but reaches a similar performance to a model trained on pooled data.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Centralized vs Decentralized Federated Learning: A trade-off performance analysis

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Experimental analysis of performance trade-offs across CFL, DFL, and SDFL using Fedstellar simulator, MNIST, and MLP.