REVIEW 2 cited by
Model-independent determination of $H_0$ and $\Omega_{K0}$ from strong lensing and type Ia supernovae
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present the first determination of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from strong lensing time delay data and type Ia supernova luminosity distances that is independent of the cosmological model. We also determine the spatial curvature model-independently. We assume that light propagation over long distances is described by the FLRW metric and geometrical optics holds, but make no assumption about the contents of the Universe or the theory of gravity on cosmological scales. We find $H_0=75.7^{+4.5}_{-4.4}$ km/s/Mpc and $\Omega_{K0}=0.12^{+0.27}_{-0.25}$. This is a 6\% determination of $H_0$. A weak prior from the cosmic microwave background on the distance to the last scattering surface improves this to $H_0=76.8^{+4.2}_{-3.8}$ km/s/Mpc and $\Omega_{K0}=0.18^{+0.25}_{-0.18}$. Assuming zero spatial curvature, we get $H_0=74.2^{+3.0}_{-2.9}$ km/s/Mpc, a precision of $4\%$. The measurements also provide a consistency test of the FLRW metric: we find no evidence against it.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
A Joint Analysis of Strong Lensing and Type Ia Supernovae to Determine the Hubble Constant
A model-independent combination of strong lensing and supernova data gives H0 = 70.55 ± 7.44 km/s/Mpc, consistent with both Planck and SH0ES within 1sigma.
-
A cosmographic analysis using DESI-DR2 and strong lensing: II. Distance Ratio measurements
A distance-sum-rule cosmographic fit combining strong-lensing distance ratios, three Type Ia supernova compilations, and DESI-DR2 BAO constrains Omega_k0, q0, j0, s0 and finds consistency with flat Lambda-CDM, but wit...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.