Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Overlearning Reveals Sensitive Attributes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.11742 v3 pith:3L73ZDWZ submitted 2019-05-28 cs.LG cs.NEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.NEstat.ML
keywords modeloverlearningattributessensitivetrainingdataevenlearns
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

"Overlearning" means that a model trained for a seemingly simple objective implicitly learns to recognize attributes and concepts that are (1) not part of the learning objective, and (2) sensitive from a privacy or bias perspective. For example, a binary gender classifier of facial images also learns to recognize races\textemdash even races that are not represented in the training data\textemdash and identities. We demonstrate overlearning in several vision and NLP models and analyze its harmful consequences. First, inference-time representations of an overlearned model reveal sensitive attributes of the input, breaking privacy protections such as model partitioning. Second, an overlearned model can be "re-purposed" for a different, privacy-violating task even in the absence of the original training data. We show that overlearning is intrinsic for some tasks and cannot be prevented by censoring unwanted attributes. Finally, we investigate where, when, and why overlearning happens during model training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What's Privacy Good for? Measuring Privacy as a Shield from Harms due to Personal Data Use

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A survey of 400 students shows that 14 perceived privacy harms form a single reliable scale that varies by data type and context.

  2. Multimodal Federated Learning: A Survey through the Lens of Different FL Paradigms

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A paradigm-based taxonomy of multimodal federated learning that assigns each branch a headline challenge: modality heterogeneity (horizontal), privacy leakage (vertical), and efficiency (hybrid).

  3. Securing AI Systems: A Guide to Known Attacks and Impacts

    cs.CR 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A practitioner-oriented review that organizes known adversarial attacks on predictive and generative AI systems into eleven types mapped to confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Pith tools