Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adversarial Imitation Learning from Incomplete Demonstrations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.12310 v3 pith:CIEC4YLI submitted 2019-05-29 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords demonstrationslearningpolicyactionsagailimitationactionavailable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Imitation learning targets deriving a mapping from states to actions, a.k.a. policy, from expert demonstrations. Existing methods for imitation learning typically require any actions in the demonstrations to be fully available, which is hard to ensure in real applications. Though algorithms for learning with unobservable actions have been proposed, they focus solely on state information and overlook the fact that the action sequence could still be partially available and provide useful information for policy deriving. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm called Action-Guided Adversarial Imitation Learning (AGAIL) that learns a policy from demonstrations with incomplete action sequences, i.e., incomplete demonstrations. The core idea of AGAIL is to separate demonstrations into state and action trajectories, and train a policy with state trajectories while using actions as auxiliary information to guide the training whenever applicable. Built upon the Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning, AGAIL has three components: a generator, a discriminator, and a guide. The generator learns a policy with rewards provided by the discriminator, which tries to distinguish state distributions between demonstrations and samples generated by the policy. The guide provides additional rewards to the generator when demonstrated actions for specific states are available. We compare AGAIL to other methods on benchmark tasks and show that AGAIL consistently delivers comparable performance to the state-of-the-art methods even when the action sequence in demonstrations is only partially available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mixture of Autoencoder Experts Guidance using Unlabeled and Incomplete Data for Exploration in Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    MoE-GUIDE guides RL exploration by rewarding states that a mixture of autoencoders, trained on sparse state-only expert demonstrations, considers similar to expert data.

Pith tools