Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Log-logarithmic Time Pruned Polar Coding

Information Theory · Submitted 30 May 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The given per-bit complexity $\text{bC}$ is log-logarithmic in $N$, in $\text{Capacity}-R$, and in $P$; no known family of codes possesses this property.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1905.13340 (version 1)
Pith IDGTVGSBLX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHsin-Po Wang, Iwan Duursma. "Log-logarithmic Time Pruned Polar Coding." arXiv:1905.13340 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/GTVGSBLX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,577 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.36 · states limitation 0.21 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.15 · randomized assignment 0.02 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.97 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

A pruned variant of polar coding is proposed for binary erasure channels. For sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a series of capacity achieving codes with block length $N=\varepsilon^{-5}$, code rate $R=\text{Capacity}-\varepsilon$, error probability $P=\varepsilon$, and encoding and decoding time complexity $\text{bC}=O(\log\left|\log\varepsilon\right|)$ per information bit. The given per-bit complexity $\text{bC}$ is log-logarithmic in $N$, in $\text{Capacity}-R$, and in $P$; no known family of codes possesses this property. It is also the second lowest $\text{bC}$ after repeat-accumulate codes and their variants. While random codes and classical polar codes are the only two families of capacity-achieving codes whose $N$, $R$, $P$, and $\text{bC}$ were written down as explicit functions, our construction gives the third family. Then we generalize the result to: Fix a prime $q$ and fix a $q$-ary-input discrete symmetric memoryless channel. For sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a series of capacity achieving codes with block length $N=\varepsilon^{-O(1)}$, code rate $R=\text{Capacity}-\varepsilon$, error probability $P=\varepsilon$, and encoding and decoding time complexity $\text{bC}=O(\log\left|\log\varepsilon\right|)$ per information bit. The later construction gives the fastest family of capacity-achieving codes to date on those channels.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 A pruned variant of polar coding is proposed for binary erasure channels. contribution 1.00 0.89 0.12 asserted 1.00
s1 For sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a series of capacity achieving codes with block length $N=\varepsilon^{-5}$, code rate $R=\text{Capacity}-\varepsilon$, error probability $P=\varepsilon$, and encoding and decoding time complexity $\text{bC}=O(\log\left|\log\varepsilon\right|)$ per information bit. result 0.88 0.95 0.59 asserted 1.00
s2 The given per-bit complexity $\text{bC}$ is log-logarithmic in $N$, in $\text{Capacity}-R$, and in $P$; no known family of codes possesses this property. result 0.46 0.79 0.58 asserted 1.00
s3 It is also the second lowest $\text{bC}$ after repeat-accumulate codes and their variants. result 0.50 0.43 0.10 asserted 1.00
s4 While random codes and classical polar codes are the only two families of capacity-achieving codes whose $N$, $R$, $P$, and $\text{bC}$ were written down as explicit functions, our construction gives the third family. contribution 0.40 0.81 0.19 asserted 1.00
s5 Then we generalize the result to: Fix a prime $q$ and fix a $q$-ary-input discrete symmetric memoryless channel. contribution 0.80 0.78 0.05 asserted 0.68
s6 For sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a series of capacity achieving codes with block length $N=\varepsilon^{-O(1)}$, code rate $R=\text{Capacity}-\varepsilon$, error probability $P=\varepsilon$, and encoding and decoding time complexity $\text{bC}=O(\log\left|\log\varepsilon\right|)$ per information bit. result 0.68 0.95 0.34 asserted 1.00
s7 The later construction gives the fastest family of capacity-achieving codes to date on those channels. interpretation 0.63 0.76 0.36 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.66 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

A pruned variant of polar coding is proposed for binary erasure channels. For sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a series of capacity achieving codes with block length $N=\varepsilon^{-5}$, code rate $R=\text{Capacity}-\varepsilon$, error probability $P=\varepsilon$, and encoding and decoding time complexity $\text{bC}=O(\log\left|\log\varepsilon\right|)$ per information bit. The given per-bit complexity $\text{bC}$ is log-logarithmic in $N$, in $\text{Capacity}-R$, and in $P$; no known family of codes possesses this property. It is also the second lowest $\text{bC}$ after repeat-accumulate codes and their variants. While random codes and classical polar codes are the only two families of capacity-achieving codes whose $N$, $R$, $P$, and $\text{bC}$ were written down as explicit functions, our construction gives the third family. Then we generalize the result to: Fix a prime $q$ and fix a $q$-ary-input discrete symmetric memoryless channel. For sufficiently small $\varepsilon>0$, we construct a series of capacity achieving codes with block length $N=\varepsilon^{-O(1)}$, code rate $R=\text{Capacity}-\varepsilon$, error probability $P=\varepsilon$, and encoding and decoding time complexity $\text{bC}=O(\log\left|\log\varepsilon\right|)$ per information bit. The later construction gives the fastest family of capacity-achieving codes to date on those channels.

Human review
How the literature uses it

1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it

Cites it as background 1 paper
  • Among the chapters: <Ref> was presented in the preprint [ref] . <Ref> was presented in the preprints [ref] and [ref] , the latter of which was later published in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory [ref] . <Ref> was presented in the preprint [ref] . <Ref> was presented in the preprint [ref] , which was later published in IEEE Transactions on Information Theory [ref] .

    Complexity and Second Moment of the Mathematical Theory of Communication · Organization of the Dissertation · 0.92

What it cites · 10 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 1 paper
  • We want to find constants $μ>0$ and $β>0$ such that the process $I_i$ satisfies [equation] We borrow terminologies and lemmas from [ref] for a head start.

    General Strong Polarization · Proof of Theorem [ref] · 0.93

Cites as support 1 paper
  • By [ref] , the process $I_i$ corresponding to $$ is locally polarizing.

    General Strong Polarization · Proof of Theorem [ref] · 0.96

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.