Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.13655 v3 pith:3BH6MY6C submitted 2019-05-31 cs.LG cs.AIcs.NEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.NEstat.ML
keywords implicitmatrixregularizationdeepfactorizationgradient-basedoptimizationtowards
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Efforts to understand the generalization mystery in deep learning have led to the belief that gradient-based optimization induces a form of implicit regularization, a bias towards models of low "complexity." We study the implicit regularization of gradient descent over deep linear neural networks for matrix completion and sensing, a model referred to as deep matrix factorization. Our first finding, supported by theory and experiments, is that adding depth to a matrix factorization enhances an implicit tendency towards low-rank solutions, oftentimes leading to more accurate recovery. Secondly, we present theoretical and empirical arguments questioning a nascent view by which implicit regularization in matrix factorization can be captured using simple mathematical norms. Our results point to the possibility that the language of standard regularizers may not be rich enough to fully encompass the implicit regularization brought forth by gradient-based optimization.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. One Rank at a Time: Cascading Error Dynamics in Sequential Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Errors from each rank-1 step in sequential low-rank learning compound through factors that grow when singular values are close, so early steps deserve more compute.

  2. Optimizers Qualitatively Alter Solutions And We Should Leverage This

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Deep learning optimizers should be designed to induce desired solution properties, not just convergence speed; different optimizers demonstrably land in qualitatively different minima.

Pith tools