REVIEW 1 cited by
Panoptic Edge Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Pursuing more complete and coherent scene understanding towards realistic vision applications drives edge detection from category-agnostic to category-aware semantic level. However, finer delineation of instance-level boundaries still remains unexcavated. In this work, we address a new finer-grained task, termed panoptic edge detection (PED), which aims at predicting semantic-level boundaries for stuff categories and instance-level boundaries for instance categories, in order to provide more comprehensive and unified scene understanding from the perspective of edges.We then propose a versatile framework, Panoptic Edge Network (PEN), which aggregates different tasks of object detection, semantic and instance edge detection into a single holistic network with multiple branches. Based on the same feature representation, the semantic edge branch produces semantic-level boundaries for all categories and the object detection branch generates instance proposals. Conditioned on the prior information from these two branches, the instance edge branch aims at instantiating edge predictions for instance categories. Besides, we also devise a Panoptic Dual F-measure (F2) metric for the new PED task to uniformly measure edge prediction quality for both stuff and instances. By joint end-to-end training, the proposed PEN framework outperforms all competitive baselines on Cityscapes and ADE20K datasets.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
End-to-End Boundary Aware Networks for Medical Image Segmentation
A boundary-aware CNN with a dedicated edge stream and edge losses improves tumor-core segmentation on 2D slices of BraTS 2018 compared to U-Net and V-Net, though the evaluation has internal inconsistencies.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.