Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Text

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.03351 v2 pith:HHHWKTOZ submitted 2019-06-07 cs.LG cs.CLstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CLstat.ML
keywords ebmsmodelstextgeneratednegativestrainingauto-regressivediscriminate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Energy-based models (EBMs), a.k.a. un-normalized models, have had recent successes in continuous spaces. However, they have not been successfully applied to model text sequences. While decreasing the energy at training samples is straightforward, mining (negative) samples where the energy should be increased is difficult. In part, this is because standard gradient-based methods are not readily applicable when the input is high-dimensional and discrete. Here, we side-step this issue by generating negatives using pre-trained auto-regressive language models. The EBM then works in the residual of the language model; and is trained to discriminate real text from text generated by the auto-regressive models. We investigate the generalization ability of residual EBMs, a pre-requisite for using them in other applications. We extensively analyze generalization for the task of classifying whether an input is machine or human generated, a natural task given the training loss and how we mine negatives. Overall, we observe that EBMs can generalize remarkably well to changes in the architecture of the generators producing negatives. However, EBMs exhibit more sensitivity to the training set used by such generators.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Code via Approximated Task Conditioning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ATC detects AI-generated code by asking a language model to reconstruct the programming task, then scoring token entropy under that reconstructed task, outperforming prior zero-shot detectors on Python, C++, and Java ...

  2. AI-Generated Song Detection via Lyrics Transcripts

    cs.SD 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Transcribing audio with Whisper and classifying the transcript with LLM2Vec detects AI-generated songs from audio alone, nearly matching clean-lyrics accuracy and beating audio-based detectors under perturbations and ...

  3. DivScore: Zero-Shot Detection of LLM-Generated Text in Specialized Domains

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DivScore detects AI-written medical and legal text by dividing a domain-tuned model's entropy by its disagreement with a general model, beating baselines on a new benchmark.

  4. AGENT-X: Adaptive Guideline-based Expert Network for Threshold-free AI-generated teXt detection

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    AGENT-X is a zero-shot multi-LLM framework for AI-generated text detection that routes texts to guideline-specific agents and aggregates their calibrated confidences without threshold tuning.

Pith tools