Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1906.06423 v4 pith:CCZ4IQZY submitted 2019-06-14 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords testresolutiontrainingimagestrainaccuracytop-1x224
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Data-augmentation is key to the training of neural networks for image classification. This paper first shows that existing augmentations induce a significant discrepancy between the typical size of the objects seen by the classifier at train and test time. We experimentally validate that, for a target test resolution, using a lower train resolution offers better classification at test time. We then propose a simple yet effective and efficient strategy to optimize the classifier performance when the train and test resolutions differ. It involves only a computationally cheap fine-tuning of the network at the test resolution. This enables training strong classifiers using small training images. For instance, we obtain 77.1% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet with a ResNet-50 trained on 128x128 images, and 79.8% with one trained on 224x224 image. In addition, if we use extra training data we get 82.5% with the ResNet-50 train with 224x224 images. Conversely, when training a ResNeXt-101 32x48d pre-trained in weakly-supervised fashion on 940 million public images at resolution 224x224 and further optimizing for test resolution 320x320, we obtain a test top-1 accuracy of 86.4% (top-5: 98.0%) (single-crop). To the best of our knowledge this is the highest ImageNet single-crop, top-1 and top-5 accuracy to date.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scale Calibrated Training: Improving Generalization of Deep Networks via Scale-Specific Normalization

    cs.CV 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Scale Calibrated Training with Scale-Specific Batch Normalization lets one CNN classify images at multiple resolutions, improving ImageNet top-1 at 224 and at 128 over standard single-scale training.

  2. Mix & Match: training convnets with mixed image sizes for improved accuracy, speed and scale resiliency

    cs.CV 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MixSize training makes ImageNet classifiers resilient to smaller test images, matching baseline top-1 accuracy at 160x160 with about half the inference compute, while optionally improving accuracy or training speed.

Pith tools