Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks

Machine Learning · Submitted 19 Jun 2019

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Then we show that the optimal robust loss is also close to zero, hence adversarial training finds a robust classifier.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID1906.07916 (version 2)
Pith IDYOXJM27N, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationCho-Jui Hsieh, Haochuan Li, Jason D. Lee, Liwei Wang, Ruiqi Gao, Tianle Cai. "Convergence of Adversarial Training in Overparametrized Neural Networks." arXiv:1906.07916 (2019). https://pith.science/paper/YOXJM27N
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,107 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.63 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.04 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.76 · compares with prior results 0.17 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e. inputs that are imperceptibly perturbed from natural data and yet incorrectly classified by the network. Adversarial training, a heuristic form of robust optimization that alternates between minimization and maximization steps, has proven to be among the most successful methods to train networks to be robust against a pre-defined family of perturbations. This paper provides a partial answer to the success of adversarial training, by showing that it converges to a network where the surrogate loss with respect to the the attack algorithm is within $\epsilon$ of the optimal robust loss. Then we show that the optimal robust loss is also close to zero, hence adversarial training finds a robust classifier. The analysis technique leverages recent work on the analysis of neural networks via Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), combined with motivation from online-learning when the maximization is solved by a heuristic, and the expressiveness of the NTK kernel in the $\ell_\infty$-norm. In addition, we also prove that robust interpolation requires more model capacity, supporting the evidence that adversarial training requires wider networks.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e. inputs that are imperceptibly perturbed from natural data and yet incorrectly classified by the network. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Adversarial training, a heuristic form of robust optimization that alternates between minimization and maximization steps, has proven to be among the most successful methods to train networks to be robust against a pre-defined family of perturbations. background 1.00 0.05 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 This paper provides a partial answer to the success of adversarial training, by showing that it converges to a network where the surrogate loss with respect to the the attack algorithm is within $\epsilon$ of the optimal robust loss. result 0.63 0.94 0.68 asserted 0.99
s3 Then we show that the optimal robust loss is also close to zero, hence adversarial training finds a robust classifier. result 0.92 0.93 0.40 asserted 1.00
s4 The analysis technique leverages recent work on the analysis of neural networks via Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), combined with motivation from online-learning when the maximization is solved by a heuristic, and the expressiveness of the NTK kernel in the $\ell_\infty$-norm. method 0.98 0.40 0.03 asserted 0.97
s5 In addition, we also prove that robust interpolation requires more model capacity, supporting the evidence that adversarial training requires wider networks. result 0.94 0.90 0.06 asserted 0.99

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Neural networks are vulnerable to adversarial examples, i.e. inputs that are imperceptibly perturbed from natural data and yet incorrectly classified by the network. Adversarial training, a heuristic form of robust optimization that alternates between minimization and maximization steps, has proven to be among the most successful methods to train networks to be robust against a pre-defined family of perturbations. This paper provides a partial answer to the success of adversarial training, by showing that it converges to a network where the surrogate loss with respect to the the attack algorithm is within $\epsilon$ of the optimal robust loss. Then we show that the optimal robust loss is also close to zero, hence adversarial training finds a robust classifier. The analysis technique leverages recent work on the analysis of neural networks via Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK), combined with motivation from online-learning when the maximization is solved by a heuristic, and the expressiveness of the NTK kernel in the $\ell_\infty$-norm. In addition, we also prove that robust interpolation requires more model capacity, supporting the evidence that adversarial training requires wider networks.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

10 arXiv papers cite this in 18 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 7 sentences without a confident label

Contests it 1 paper
  • However, in both cases, adversarial examples generated by the initial NTK do not transfer at all to fully trained networks, suggesting that the initialization NTK analysis of adversarial examples in some theoretical work [ref] may not be accurately describe the behavior of adversarial examples in practical networks.

    Evolution of Neural Tangent Kernels under Benign and Adversarial Training · Adversarial Transferability of Linearized Dynamics · contest 0.78

Cites it as background 8 papers

What it cites · 30 sentences without a confident label

Uses the method or tool of 3 papers
Cites as support 3 papers
  • In fact, empirical evidence have already shown that to reliably withstand strong adversarial attacks, networks require a significantly larger capacity than for correctly classifying benign examples only [ref] .

    Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attacks · Capacity Requirement of Robustness · 1.00

  • Apart from this paper, there are other works supporting the need for capacity including the perspective of network width [ref] , depth [ref] and computational complexity [ref] .

    Intriguing properties of adversarial training at scale · Discussion on Limitations and Future Directions · 0.99

  • Apart from this paper, there are other works supporting the need for capacity including the perspective of network width [ref] , depth [ref] and computational complexity [ref] .

    Adversarial Robustness May Be at Odds With Simplicity · Discussion on Limitations and Future Directions · 0.99

Cites as background 12 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.