pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.08341 · v1 · pith:CTVYUBHJnew · submitted 2019-06-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Polarization-dependent conductivity of grain boundaries in BiFeO3 thin films

Denis Alikin , Yevhen Fomichov , Saulo Portes Reis , Alexander Abramov , Dmitry Chezganov , Vladimir Shur , Eugene Eliseev , Anna Morozovska
show 2 more authors
Eudes Araujo Andrei Kholkin
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 19:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords BiFeO3grain boundariesconductivitypolarizationferroelectric thin filmsdomain structurecharge transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

Grain boundaries in BiFeO3 thin films conduct electricity differently depending on polarization alignment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how polarization affects electrical conductivity at grain boundaries in sol-gel grown BiFeO3 thin films. Grains form clusters with aligned polarizations, creating two types of boundaries: those between clusters where polarizations point oppositely and those within clusters where they align. Boundaries with antiparallel polarizations show much higher conductivity than the material bulk, while aligned ones show lower conductivity. Thermodynamic modeling and finite element simulations attribute this to charge and stress buildup at the boundaries. This finding indicates that polarization configuration can directly influence transport properties at natural interfaces in ferroelectrics.

Core claim

Polarization-dependent conductivity of the grain boundaries was observed for the first time in ferroelectric thin films. In BiFeO3 films, grain boundaries between domain clusters with antiparallel polarization directions exhibit significantly higher electrical conductivity compared to inter-cluster grain boundaries, which have conductivity even smaller than in the bulk. The results are explained by thermodynamic modelling combined with finite element simulations showing that charge and stress accumulation at the grain boundaries contributes majorly to the conductivity.

What carries the argument

Domain clusters of aligned polarization grains in BiFeO3 films, with conductivity at boundaries determined by whether adjacent clusters have parallel or antiparallel polarizations, modeled via thermodynamic and finite element analysis of charge and stress.

If this is right

  • The conductivity of grain boundaries can be modulated by the relative polarization directions across them.
  • This polarization dependence opens a new way to use grain boundaries in ferroelectric devices for electronic applications.
  • Charge transport across interfaces in complex oxides can be engineered using polarization configurations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar polarization-dependent effects might appear in other polycrystalline ferroelectric materials.
  • Device designs could incorporate controlled grain boundary orientations for tunable conductivity.
  • The modeling approach could be applied to predict conductivity in different ferroelectric compositions.

Load-bearing premise

The observed conductivity variations stem mainly from the polarization directions at the grain boundaries rather than from variations in defects or material composition.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of defect densities and stoichiometry at multiple grain boundaries of both types combined with conductivity mapping to check if differences persist when microstructure is controlled.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.08341 by Alexander Abramov, Andrei Kholkin, Anna Morozovska, Denis Alikin, Dmitry Chezganov, Eudes Araujo, Eugene Eliseev, Saulo Portes Reis, Vladimir Shur, Yevhen Fomichov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Frequency dependencies of real dielectric permittivity (ε´) and dielectric loss (tan δ) (a) and ac conductivity (b) of BiFeO3 thin films at room temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Frequency dependence of (a) real (Z´) and imaginary (Z´´) parts of impedance and (b) real (M´) and imaginary (M´´) parts of electric modulus of BiFeO3 thin film. Nyquist plots of (c) complex impedance and (d) complex electric modulus of BiFeO3 film made at room temperature. The continuous lines are theoretical approximation by equations of Cole-Cole model (see Supporting Information for details). The frequ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Charge transport across the interfaces in complex oxides attracts a lot of attention because it allows creating novel functionalities useful for device applications. In particular, it has been observed that movable domain walls in epitaxial BiFeO3 films possess enhanced conductivity that can be used for read out in ferroelectric-based memories. In this work, the relation between the polarization and conductivity in sol-gel BiFeO3 films with special emphasis on grain boundaries as natural interfaces in polycrystalline ferroelectrics is investigated. The grains exhibit self-organized domain structure in these films, so that the "domain clusters" consisting of several grains with aligned polarization directions are formed. Surprisingly, grain boundaries between these clusters (with antiparallel polarization direction) have significantly higher electrical conductivity in comparison to "inter-cluster" grain boundaries, in which the conductivity was even smaller than in the bulk. As such, polarization-dependent conductivity of the grain boundaries was observed for the first time in ferroelectric thin films. The results are rationalized by thermodynamic modelling combined with finite element simulations of the charge and stress accumulation at the grain boundaries giving major contribution to conductivity. The observed polarization-dependent conductivity of grain boundaries in ferroelectrics opens up a new avenue for exploiting these materials in electronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental observation in sol-gel BiFeO3 polycrystalline thin films that grain boundaries separating domain clusters with antiparallel polarization (inter-cluster GBs) exhibit higher conductivity than intra-cluster GBs with parallel polarization (and even higher than the grain interiors). PFM is used to map polarization and identify clusters; conductivity is mapped (presumably via c-AFM). Thermodynamic modeling plus FEM simulations are presented to rationalize the contrast via polarization-driven charge and stress accumulation at the boundaries.

Significance. If the polarization dependence can be isolated from correlated microstructural factors, the result would be novel as the first reported polarization-dependent GB conductivity in ferroelectric thin films and could suggest new routes for interface engineering in oxide electronics. The modeling provides a plausible physical picture but is presented as rationalization rather than a parameter-free prediction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results section (conductivity mapping data)] The central experimental claim (higher conductivity at inter-cluster GBs) is not supported by quantitative values, error bars, number of GBs sampled, or statistical tests in the provided description; without these, it is impossible to judge whether the reported contrast is reproducible or significant.
  2. [Experimental methods and discussion] No chemical or compositional mapping (STEM-EELS/EDS) or post-processing controls (e.g., annealing to alter defect populations while preserving polarization) are described that would isolate polarization direction from possible systematic differences in oxygen-vacancy segregation, Bi/Fe ratio, or secondary phases between inter- and intra-cluster boundaries.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract states the observation without referencing specific figures or quantitative contrasts.
  2. [Modeling and simulation] Clarify in the modeling section whether the thermodynamic/FEM parameters are taken from literature or adjusted to match the observed conductivity contrast.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section (conductivity mapping data)] The central experimental claim (higher conductivity at inter-cluster GBs) is not supported by quantitative values, error bars, number of GBs sampled, or statistical tests in the provided description; without these, it is impossible to judge whether the reported contrast is reproducible or significant.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative presentation of the conductivity data is needed to allow assessment of reproducibility and significance. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary figure (or expanded main-text panel) containing box plots or histograms of local conductivity values extracted from inter-cluster and intra-cluster grain boundaries. These will report mean values with standard deviations, the total number of grain boundaries sampled across multiple films and scan locations, and the outcome of a non-parametric statistical test (e.g., Mann–Whitney U) comparing the two populations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental methods and discussion] No chemical or compositional mapping (STEM-EELS/EDS) or post-processing controls (e.g., annealing to alter defect populations while preserving polarization) are described that would isolate polarization direction from possible systematic differences in oxygen-vacancy segregation, Bi/Fe ratio, or secondary phases between inter- and intra-cluster boundaries.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the absence of direct compositional mapping leaves open the possibility of correlated chemical differences. Our thermodynamic model nevertheless demonstrates that the measured conductivity contrast is quantitatively consistent with polarization-driven charge accumulation and local stress at the boundaries; the fact that intra-cluster boundaries exhibit lower conductivity than the grain interiors further argues against a simple chemical-origin scenario that would affect all grain boundaries equally. We will expand the discussion section to explicitly note this limitation and to clarify how the modeling supports a polarization-dominated mechanism. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: central claim is experimental observation with modeling as post-hoc rationalization

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing claim is the experimental observation that grain boundaries between antiparallel-polarization domain clusters exhibit higher conductivity than intra-cluster boundaries (and even bulk). This is measured directly via PFM and conductive AFM on sol-gel films; the classification into inter- vs. intra-cluster boundaries is performed by direct imaging of polarization directions. Thermodynamic modeling plus FEM is explicitly described as rationalization of the data rather than a derivation whose outputs are forced by construction from the inputs. No equations reduce a fitted parameter to a renamed prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citations to forbid alternatives, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (the conductivity maps themselves).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are described in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 964 out tokens · 33423 ms · 2026-05-25T19:59:17.123455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 82 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Eshita, W

    T. Eshita, W. Wang, K. Nomura, K. Nakamura, H. Sai to, H. Yamaguchi, S. Mihara, Y. Hikosaka, Y. Kataoka, M. Kojima, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    A. Q. Jiang, Y. Zhang, NPG Asia Mater. 2019, 9

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Seidel, L

    J. Seidel, L. W. Martin, Q. He, Q. Zhan, Y.-H. Chu, a Rother, M. E. Hawkridge, P. Maksymovych, P. Yu, M. Gajek, N. Balke, S. V Kalinin, S. Gemming, F. Wang, G. Catalan, J. F. Scott, N. a Spaldin, J. Orenstein, R. Ramesh, Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 229

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Maksymovych, J

    P. Maksymovych, J. Seidel, Y. H. Chu, P. Wu, A. P. Baddorf, L. Q. Chen, S. V. Kalinin, R. Ramesh, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 1906

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Seidel, P

    J. Seidel, P. Maksymovych, Y. Batra, A. Katan, S.-Y. Yang, Q. He, A. P. Baddorf, S. V. Kalinin, C.-H. Yang, J.-C. Yang, Y.-H. Chu, E. K. H. Salje, H. Wormeester, M. Salmeron, R. Ramesh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105, 197603

    work page 2010

  6. [6]

    C. T. Nelson, B. Winchester, Y. Zhang, S. J. Kim, A. Melville, C. Adamo, C. M. Folkman, S. H. Baek, C. B. Eom, D. G. Schlom, L. Q. Chen, X. Pan, Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 828

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Balke, S

    N. Balke, S. Choudhury, S. Jesse, M. Huijben, Y. H. Chu, a P. Baddorf, L. Q. Chen, R. Ramesh, S. V Kalinin, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 868

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    Y. Heo, J. Hong Lee, L. Xie, X. Pan, C.-H. Yang, J. Seidel, NPG Asia Mater. 2016, 8, e297

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Lu, L. Xie, X. Yan, T. R. Paudel, J. Kim, X. Cheng, H. Wang, C. Heikes, L. Li, M. Xu, D. G. Schlom, L.-Q. Chen, R. Wu, E. Y. Tsymbal, A. Gruverman, X. Pan, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018, 13, 1132

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    G. Arlt, N. a. Pertsev, J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 70, 2283

    work page 1991

  11. [11]

    S. Li, A. S. Bhalla, R. E. Newnham, L. E. Cross, Mater. Lett. 1993, 17, 21

    work page 1993

  12. [12]

    B. J. Rodriguez, Y. H. Chu, R. Ramesh, S. V. Kalinin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2008, 93, 29 142901

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    D. M. Marincel, H. Zhang, S. Jesse, A. Belianinov, M. B. Okatan, S. V. Kalinin, W. M. Rainforth, I. M. Reaney, C. A. Randall, S. Trolier-McKinstry, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 1848

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    H. Hu, S. B. Krupanidhi, J. Mater. Res. 1994, 9, 1484

    work page 1994

  15. [15]

    Gregori, R

    G. Gregori, R. Merkle, J. Maier, Prog. Mater. Sci. 2017, 89, 252

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Imaeda, T

    M. Imaeda, T. Mizoguchi, Y. Sato, H. S. Lee, S. D. Findlay, N. Shibata, T. Yamamoto, Y. Ikuhara, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2008, 78, 1

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    Symposium Proceedings (Cat

    Jang-Sik Lee, Seung-Ki Joo, In 2001 International Semiconductor Device Research Symposium. Symposium Proceedings (Cat. No.01EX497); IEEE, 2001; Vol. 46, pp. 165–168

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    Y. A. Genenko, O. Hirsch, P. Erhart, J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 104102

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Rojac, H

    T. Rojac, H. Ursic, A. Bencan, B. Malic, D. Damjanovic, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2015, 25, 2099

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    W. Cao, C. A. Randall, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 1996, 57, 1499

    work page 1996

  21. [21]

    Demartin, D

    M. Demartin, D. Damjanovic, Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996, 68, 3046

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Damjanovic, M

    D. Damjanovic, M. Demartin, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 1997, 9, 4943

    work page 1997

  23. [23]

    D. A. Hall, A. Steuwer, B. Cherdhirunkorn, T. Mori, P. J. Withers, J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 96, 4245

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    Griggio, S

    F. Griggio, S. Trolier-McKinstry, J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    Rojac, A

    T. Rojac, A. Bencan, G. Drazic, N. Sakamoto, H. Ursic, B. Jancar, G. Tavcar, M. Makarovic, J. Walker, B. Malic, D. Damjanovic, Nat. Mater. 2017, 16, 322

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    J. L. M. Rupp, Solid State Ionics 2012, 207, 1

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Simons, A

    H. Simons, A. B. Haugen, A. C. Jakobsen, S. Schmidt, F. Stöhr, M. Majkut, C. Detlefs, J. E. Daniels, D. Damjanovic, H. F. Poulsen, Nat. Mater. 2018, 17, 814

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Y. A. Genenko, O. Hirsch, P. Erhart, In Proceedings of ISAF-ECAPD-PFM 2012; IEEE, 2012; pp. 1–4. 30

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    Waser, M

    R. Waser, M. Klee, Integr. Ferroelectr. 1992, 2, 23

    work page 1992

  30. [30]

    K. M. Holsgrove, D. M. Kepaptsoglou, A. M. Douglas, Q. M. Ramasse, E. Prestat, S. J. Haigh, M. B. Ward, A. Kumar, J. M. Gregg, M. Arredondo, APL Mater. 2017, 5, 066105

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    A. N. Morozovska, R. K. Vasudevan, P. Maksymovych, S. V. Kalinin, E. A. Eliseev, Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 085315

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Stojadinović, B

    B. Stojadinović, B. Vasić, D. Stepanenko, N. Tadić, R. Gajić, Z. Dohčević -Mitrović, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2015, 49

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    Schrade, N

    M. Schrade, N. Masó, A. Perejón, L. A. Pérez-Maqueda, A. R. West, J. Mater. Chem. C 2017, 5, 10077

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Liang, J

    Y.-C. Liang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, G137

    work page 2011

  35. [35]

    Lahmar, S

    A. Lahmar, S. Habouti, C. H. Solterbeck, M. Dietze, M. Es-Souni, J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107

    work page 2010

  36. [36]

    A. S. Borowiak, K. Okada, T. Kanki, B. Gautier, B. Vilquin, H. Tanaka, Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 351, 531

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    M. I. Morozov, D. Damjanovic, J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 107, 1

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    M. I. Morozov, M.-A. Einarsrud, T. Grande, J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 044104

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    A. R. Makhdoom, M. J. Akhtar, R. T. A. Khan, M. A. Rafiq, M. M. Hasan, F. Sher, A. N. Fitch, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 143, 256

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Landau, Phys

    L. Landau, Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8 153; 1935

    work page 1935

  41. [41]

    Kittel, Phys

    C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 1946, 70, 965

    work page 1946

  42. [42]

    M. D. Glinchuk, E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 134107

    work page 2008

  43. [43]

    A. Wu, P. M. Vilarinho, V. V. Shvartsman, G. Suchaneck, A. L. Kholkin, Nanotechnology 2005, 16, 2587

    work page 2005

  44. [44]

    Ferreira, R

    P. Ferreira, R. Z. Hou, A. Wu, M. G. Willinger, P. M. Vilarinho, J. Mosa, C. Laberty- Robert, C. Boissière, D. Grosso, C. Sanchez, Langmuir 2012, 28, 2944

    work page 2012

  45. [45]

    S. Choi, J. Heo, I. Chung, S. K. Hong, Japanese J. Appl. Physics, Part 1 Regul. Pap. 31 Short Notes Rev. Pap. 2005, 44, 972

    work page 2005

  46. [46]

    S. V. Kalinin, B. J. Rodriguez, S. Jesse, J. Shin, A. P. Baddorf, P. Gupta, H. Jain, D. B. Williams, A. Gruverman, Microsc. Microanal. 2006, 12, 206

    work page 2006

  47. [47]

    A. L. Kholkin, K. G. Brooks, D. V Taylor, S. Hiboux, N. Setter, Integr. Ferroelectr. 1998, 22, 525

    work page 1998

  48. [48]

    Engler, V

    O. Engler, V. Randle, Introduction to texture analysis. Macrotexture, Microtexture and Orientation Mapping; 2010

    work page 2010

  49. [49]

    Khomyakova, M

    E. Khomyakova, M. Sadl, H. Ursic, J. Daniels, B. Malic, A. Bencan, D. Damjanovic, T. Rojac, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 19626

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Ohtomo, H

    A. Ohtomo, H. Y. Hwang, Nature 2004, 427, 423

    work page 2004

  51. [51]

    Thiel, Science (80-

    S. Thiel, Science (80-. ). 2006, 313, 1942

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    V. Y. Shur, I. S. Baturin, A. R. Akhmatkhanov, D. S. Chezganov, A. A. Esin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2013, 103

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Sluka, A

    T. Sluka, A. K. Tagantsev, P. Bednyakov, N. Setter, Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1808

    work page 2013

  54. [54]

    C. S. Werner, S. J. Herr, K. Buse, B. Sturman, E. Soergel, C. Razzaghi, I. Breunig, Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9862

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Watanabe, Y

    Y. Watanabe, Y. Urakami, S. Kaku, D. Matsumoto, Ferroelectrics 2007, 355, 13

    work page 2007

  56. [56]

    A. V. Belyaev, S. O. Kramarov, A. A. Grekov, Glas. Ceram. 1989, 46, 345

    work page 1989

  57. [57]

    S. I. Wright, M. M. Nowell, Microsc. Microanal. 2006, 12, 72

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Kamaya, A

    M. Kamaya, A. J. Wilkinson, J. M. Titchmarsh, Nucl. Eng. Des. 2005, 235, 713

    work page 2005

  59. [59]

    V. Y. Shur, E. A. Mingaliev, V. A. Lebedev, D. K. Kuznetsov, D. V. Fursov, J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 187211

    work page 2013

  60. [61]

    Hlinka, P

    J. Hlinka, P. Márton, Phys. Rev. B 2006, 74, 104104

    work page 2006

  61. [62]

    Y. Gu, K. Rabe, E. Bousquet, V. Gopalan, L.-Q. Chen, Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 064117. 32

    work page 2012

  62. [65]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. V. Semchenko, Y. M. Fomichov, M. D. Glinchuk, V. V. Sidsky, V. V. Kolos, Y. M. Pleskachevsky, M. V. Silibin, N. V. Morozovsky, A. N. Morozovska, J. Appl. Phys. 2016, 119, 204104

    work page 2016

  63. [66]

    E. A. Eliseev, Y. M. Fomichоv, S. V. Kalinin, Y. M. Vysochanskii, P. Maksymovich, A. N. Morozovska, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 98, 054101

    work page 2018

  64. [67]

    J. Wang, A. K. Tagantsev, N. Setter, Phys. Rev. B 2011, 83, 014104

    work page 2011

  65. [68]

    I. P. Batra, P. Wurfel, B. D. Silverman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 1973, 30, 384

    work page 1973

  66. [69]

    Wurfel, I

    P. Wurfel, I. P. Batra, Ferroelectrics 1976, 12, 55

    work page 1976

  67. [70]

    Stengel, N

    M. Stengel, N. A. Spaldin, Nature 2006, 443, 679

    work page 2006

  68. [71]

    Stengel, D

    M. Stengel, D. Vanderbilt, N. A. Spaldin, Phys. Rev. B 2009, 80, 224110

    work page 2009

  69. [72]

    Z. Fu, Z. G. Yin, N. F. Chen, X. W. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. M. Bai, J. L. Wu, Phys. status solidi - Rapid Res. Lett. 2012, 6, 37

    work page 2012

  70. [74]

    A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, M. D. Glinchuk, O. M. Fesenko, V. V. Shvartsman, V. Gopalan, M. V. Silibin, D. V. Karpinsky, Phys. Rev. B 2018, 97, 134115

    work page 2018

  71. [75]

    E. A. Eliseev, A. N. Morozovska, G. S. Svechnikov, P. Maksymovych, S. V. Kalinin, Phys. Rev. B 2012, 85, 045312

    work page 2012

  72. [76]

    E. A. Eliseev, P. V. Yudin, S. V. Kalinin, N. Setter, A. K. Tagantsev, A. N. Morozovska, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2013, 87, 1. 33 Supporting Information Title Polarization-dependent conductivity of grain boundaries in BiFeO3 thin films Denis Alikin *, Yevhen Fomichov, Saulo Portes Reis, Alexander Abramov, Dmitry Chezganov, Vladimir Shur...

    work page 2013

  73. [77]

    The equations (S1) and (S2) were used to fit the experimental data in the present study

    �(𝜔𝜏)𝛼 sin �𝛼𝜋 2 �� 1 + 2(𝜔𝜏)𝛼 cos �𝛼𝜋 2 � + (𝜔𝜏)2𝛼 and 𝑀´´ = 𝑅(𝜔𝐶0) �1 + (𝜔𝜏)𝛼 cos �𝛼𝜋 2 �� 1 + 2(𝜔𝜏)𝛼 cos �𝛼𝜋 2 � + (𝜔𝜏)2𝛼 (S2) 36 where R is the electric resistance and 𝐶0 = 𝜀0 𝐴 𝑑 is the geometrical capacitance such as 𝑑 = 500 nm and 𝐴 = 71 nm². The equations (S1) and (S2) were used to fit the experimental data in the present study. The dc conductivit...

    work page

  74. [78]

    Catalan, J

    G. Catalan, J. F. Scott, Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2463

    work page 2009

  75. [79]

    Kubel, H

    F. Kubel, H. Schmid, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. B Struct. Sci. 1990, 46, 698

    work page 1990

  76. [80]

    Talkenberger, I

    A. Talkenberger, I. Vrejoiu, F. Johann, C. Röder, G. Irmer, D. Rafaja, G. Schreiber, J. Kortus, C. Himcinschi, J. Raman Spectrosc. 2015, 46, 1245

    work page 2015

  77. [81]

    Beekman, A

    C. Beekman, A. A. Reijnders, Y. S. Oh, S. W. Cheong, K. S. Burch, Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 020403

    work page 2012

  78. [82]

    Ortega, A

    N. Ortega, A. Kumar, P. Bhattacharya, S. B. Majumder, R. S. Katiyar, Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 014111

    work page 2008

  79. [83]

    J. H. Barrett, Phys. Rev. 1952, 86, 118

    work page 1952

  80. [84]

    D. V. Karpinsky, E. A. Eliseev, F. Xue, M. V. Silibin, A. Franz, M. D. Glinchuk, I. O. Troyanchuk, S. A. Gavrilov, V. Gopalan, L.-Q. Chen, A. N. Morozovska, npj Comput. Mater. 2017, 3, 20

    work page 2017

Showing first 80 references.