pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09154 · v1 · pith:WHT4X4CUnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · physics.chem-ph· physics.comp-ph

Modeling discontinuous potential distributions using the finite volume method, and application to liquid metal batteries

Norbert Weber , Steffen Landgraf , Kashif Mushtaq , Michael Nimtz , Paolo Personnettaz , Tom Weier , Ji Zhao , Donald Sadoway This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph physics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph
keywords finite volume methodjump boundary conditionsliquid metal batterypotential distributioncurrent distributiondiscontinuous potentialelectrode-electrolyte interfaceOpenFOAM
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite volume discretization of Laplace and gradient operators accounts for internal voltage jumps at electrode-electrolyte interfaces.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical model to compute three-dimensional current and potential distributions in batteries that include sudden voltage jumps at electrode-electrolyte interfaces. It does so by adapting the discretization of the Laplace and gradient operators inside the finite volume method to directly incorporate the internal jump boundary conditions. The resulting scheme is implemented as a simple battery model in OpenFOAM, checked against an analytical test case, and used to calculate the current distribution and discharge curve of a Li||Bi liquid metal battery. A sympathetic reader would care because these jumps are a physical feature of any battery yet are routinely omitted from standard continuum models, so the adapted operators promise more faithful predictions of performance in realistic three-dimensional geometries.

Core claim

The electrical potential in a battery jumps at each electrode-electrolyte interface. We present a model for computing three-dimensional current and potential distributions, which accounts for such internal voltage jumps. Within the framework of the finite volume method we discretize the Laplace and gradient operators such that they account for internal jump boundary conditions. After implementing a simple battery model in OpenFOAM we validate it using an analytical test case, and show its capabilities by simulating the current distribution and discharge curve of a Li||Bi liquid metal battery.

What carries the argument

Discretization of the Laplace and gradient operators in the finite volume method that directly incorporates internal jump boundary conditions.

If this is right

  • Three-dimensional current and potential fields can be obtained while respecting the voltage discontinuities at every electrode-electrolyte interface.
  • The scheme reproduces known analytical solutions for the potential distribution.
  • Discharge curves and nonuniform current distributions become computable for liquid metal batteries such as Li||Bi cells.
  • The same discretization framework applies to any battery geometry that contains internal jump surfaces.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be combined with existing multiphysics solvers for fluid flow or heat transfer inside the same finite-volume code.
  • It may allow coarser meshes near interfaces than methods that treat jumps by mesh refinement or additional correction terms.
  • Similar jump-handling discretizations might be written for other transport equations that experience discontinuities at material boundaries.

Load-bearing premise

The modified discretization of the Laplace and gradient operators can represent the internal voltage jumps accurately without introducing large numerical errors.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of the computed potential field against the exact analytical solution on the validation test case would reveal whether the discretization produces significant errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09154 by Donald Sadoway, Ji Zhao, Kashif Mushtaq, Michael Nimtz, Norbert Weber, Paolo Personnettaz, Steffen Landgraf, Tom Weier.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic voltage profile in an electrochemical cell with open (a) and closed (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Electric potential distribution along a line for the one-dimensional test case. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Experimental Li||Bi cell. The vessel is made of tantalum, the wires of copper. The lithium metal is contained in a spiral made of nickel. The Li-Bi layer thickness corresponds to a Li molar fraction of 0.236. The numerical model is simplified in three ways. Firstly, we insert a very thin gap artificially between electrolyte and vessel, because no current is allowed to flow there. Secondly, we model the neg… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Grid with current distribution (a), current distribution at the electrolyte-positive [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The electrical potential in a battery jumps at each electrode-electrolyte interface. We present a model for computing three-dimensional current and potential distributions, which accounts for such internal voltage jumps. Within the framework of the finite volume method we discretize the Laplace and gradient operators such that they account for internal jump boundary conditions. After implementing a simple battery model in OpenFOAM we validate it using an analytical test case, and show its capabilities by simulating the current distribution and discharge curve of a Li||Bi liquid metal battery.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a finite volume discretization of the Laplace and gradient operators that incorporates internal voltage jump boundary conditions at electrode-electrolyte interfaces. The approach is implemented in OpenFOAM for a simple battery model, validated against an analytical test case, and applied to compute three-dimensional current distributions and the discharge curve of a Li||Bi liquid metal battery.

Significance. If the discretization accurately represents the jumps, the method enables realistic 3D modeling of potential and current fields in systems with discontinuous potentials, which is relevant for liquid metal battery design. The reported analytical validation and OpenFOAM implementation are positive features supporting reproducibility and direct testing of the central discretization claim.

minor comments (4)
  1. [§3.1] §3.1: The finite-volume stencil for the jump-augmented gradient operator is given, but the treatment of non-orthogonal correction terms at the interface is not shown explicitly; a short derivation or reference to the standard OpenFOAM non-orthogonality handling would clarify implementation.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3: The convergence plot for the analytical test case uses only three mesh resolutions; adding at least one additional refinement level would better demonstrate the observed order of accuracy.
  3. [§4.3] §4.3: The battery simulation assumes constant conductivity and neglects concentration overpotentials; a brief statement of these modeling choices and their expected impact on the reported current distribution would improve context.
  4. [Table 1] Table 1: The mesh statistics are reported, but the number of cells adjacent to the jump interface is not listed; this datum would help assess whether the validation meshes adequately resolve the discontinuity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the significance of the discretization approach for systems with discontinuous potentials and the value of the OpenFOAM implementation and analytical validation. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper presents a finite-volume discretization of the Laplace and gradient operators that incorporates internal jump boundary conditions at electrode-electrolyte interfaces. The central claim is implemented directly in OpenFOAM and validated against an independent analytical test case before being applied to a Li||Bi cell. No derivation step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in via prior work by the same authors. The method is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the ability to discretize operators for jumps, with no additional free parameters or entities introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of finite volume method for solving Laplace equation
    The paper builds on FVM framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5637 in / 1021 out tokens · 31517 ms · 2026-05-25T18:25:39.576810+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    G. A. Prentice, A Survey of Numerical Methods and Solutions for Current Distribution Problems, J. Electrochem. Soc. 129 (1) (1982) 72 (1982). doi: 10.1149/1.2123795

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2123795 1982

  2. [2]

    J. O. Dukovic, Computation of current distribution in electrodeposition, a review, IBM J. Res. Dev. 34 (5) (1990) 693–705 (1990)

    work page 1990

  3. [3]

    A. Z. Weber, J. Newman, Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells, Chem. Rev. 104 (10) (2004) 4679–4726 (Oct. 2004). doi:10.1021/ cr020729l

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    K. J. Vetter, Electrochemical Kinetics Theoretical Aspects, Elsevier Sci- ence, Burlington, 1967 (1967)

    work page 1967

  5. [6]

    Newman, K

    J. Newman, K. E. Thomas-Alyea, Electrochemical Systems, John Wiley & Sons, 2004 (2004)

    work page 2004

  6. [7]

    Ismail, D

    M. Ismail, D. Ingham, K. Hughes, L. Ma, M. Pourkashanian, An efficient mathematical model for air-breathing PEM fuel cells, Appl. Energy 135 (2014) 490–503 (Dec. 2014). doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.113

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.08.113 2014

  7. [8]

    S. B. Beale, H.-W. Choi, J. G. Pharoah, H. K. Roth, H. Jasak, D. H. Jeon, Open-source computational model of a solid oxide fuel cell, Comput. Phys. Commun. 200 (2016) 15–26 (Mar. 2016). doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.10. 007. 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2015.10 2016

  8. [9]

    Deconinck, Calculation of Current Distribution and Electrode Shape Change by the Boundary Element Method, J

    J. Deconinck, Calculation of Current Distribution and Electrode Shape Change by the Boundary Element Method, J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (12) (1985) 2960–2965 (1985). doi:10.1149/1.2113701

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2113701 1985

  9. [10]

    Garc´ ıa-Camprub´ ı, Multiphysics Models for the Simulation of Solid Ox- ide Fuel Cells, Ph.D

    M. Garc´ ıa-Camprub´ ı, Multiphysics Models for the Simulation of Solid Ox- ide Fuel Cells, Ph.D. thesis, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza (2011)

    work page 2011

  10. [11]

    A. N. Colli, H. H. Girault, Compact and General Strategy for Solving Current and Potential Distribution in Electrochemical Cells Composed of Massive Monopolar and Bipolar Electrodes, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (11) (2017) E3465–E3472 (2017). doi:10.1149/2.0471711jes

    work page doi:10.1149/2.0471711jes 2017

  11. [12]

    J. S. Newman, C. W. Tobias, Theoretical Analysis of Current Distribu- tion in Porous Electrodes, J. Electrochem. Soc. 109 (12) (1962) 1183–1191 (1962). doi:10.1149/1.2425269

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2425269 1962

  12. [13]

    Newman, W

    J. Newman, W. Tiedemann, Porous-electrode theory with battery appli- cations, AIChE J. 21 (1) (1975) 25–41 (Jan. 1975). doi:10.1002/aic. 690210103

    work page doi:10.1002/aic 1975

  13. [14]

    Doyle, J

    M. Doyle, J. Newman, The use of mathematical modeling in the design of lithium/polymer battery systems, Electrochimica Acta 40 (1995) 2191– 2196 (Oct. 1995). doi:10.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0013-4686(95)00162-8 1995

  14. [15]

    T. F. Fuller, Simulation and Optimization of the Dual Lithium Ion Insertion Cell, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (1) (1994) 1–10 (1994). doi:10.1149/1. 2054684

    work page doi:10.1149/1 1994

  15. [16]

    Paxton, Modeling of Nickel/Metal Hydride Batteries, J

    B. Paxton, Modeling of Nickel/Metal Hydride Batteries, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (11) (1997) 3818–3831 (1997). doi:10.1149/1.1838098

    work page doi:10.1149/1.1838098 1997

  16. [17]

    K. B. Hueso, M. Armand, T. Rojo, High temperature sodium batteries: Status, challenges and future trends, Energy Environ. Sci. 6 (3) (2013) 734–749 (2013). doi:10.1039/c3ee24086j. 16

    work page doi:10.1039/c3ee24086j 2013

  17. [18]

    Ashour, D

    R. Ashour, D. H. Kelley, A. Salas, M. Starace, N. Weber, T. Weier, Com- peting forces in liquid metal electrodes and batteries, J. Power Sources 378 (2018) 301–310 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.042

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.12.042 2018

  18. [19]

    Weber, M

    N. Weber, M. Nimtz, P. Personnettaz, A. Salas, T. Weier, Electromag- netically driven convection suitable for mass transfer enhancement in liquid metal batteries, Appl. Therm. Eng. 143 (2018) 293–301 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.07.067

    work page doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.07.067 2018

  19. [20]

    Biesheuvel, M

    P. Biesheuvel, M. van Soestbergen, M. Bazant, Imposed currents in galvanic cells, Electrochimica Acta 54 (21) (2009) 4857–4871 (Aug. 2009). doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.073

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2009.03.073 2009

  20. [21]

    W. A. van Schalkwijk, B. Scrosati (Eds.), Advances in Lithium-Ion Batter- ies, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, NY, 2002 (2002)

    work page 2002

  21. [22]

    C. Y. Wang, W. B. Gu, Micro-Macroscopic Coupled Modeling of Batteries and Fuel Cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. 145 (1998) 3407–3417 (1998)

    work page 1998

  22. [23]

    A. J. Bard, L. R. Faulkner, Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd Edition, Wiley, New York, 2001 (2001)

    work page 2001

  23. [24]

    L¨ uck, A

    J. L¨ uck, A. Latz, Theory of reactions at electrified interfaces, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18 (27) (2016) 17799–17804 (2016). doi:10.1039/ C6CP02681H

    work page 2016

  24. [25]

    Klingert, S

    J. Klingert, S. Lynn, C. Tobias, Evaluation of current distribution in elec- trode systems by high-speed digital computers, Electrochimica Acta 9 (3) (1964) 297–311 (Mar. 1964). doi:10.1016/0013-4686(64)80019-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0013-4686(64)80019-0 1964

  25. [26]

    S. B. Beale, Use of Streamwise Periodic Boundary Conditions for Problems in Heat and Mass Transfer, J. Heat Transf. 129 (4) (2007) 601–605 (2007). doi:10.1115/1.2709976

    work page doi:10.1115/1.2709976 2007

  26. [27]

    K. A. Smith, C. D. Rahn, C.-Y. Wang, Control oriented 1D electrochemical model of lithium ion battery, Energy Convers. Manag. 48 (9) (2007) 2565– 2578 (Sep. 2007). doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.015. 17

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2007.03.015 2007

  27. [28]

    Feinauer, S

    J. Feinauer, S. Hein, S. Rave, S. Schmidt, D. Westhoff, J. Zausch, O. Iliev, A. Latz, M. Ohlberger, V. Schmidt, MULTIBAT: Unified workflow for fast electrochemical 3D simulations of lithium-ion cells combining virtual stochastic microstructures, electrochemical degradation models and model order reduction, J. Comput. Sci. (Mar. 2018). doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2018. 03.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2018 2018

  28. [29]

    A simple algorithm to implement jump boundary conditions within the lattice Boltzmann method

    B. Kaoui, A simple algorithm to implement jump boundary conditions within the lattice Boltzmann method, arXiv:1811.01899 (Nov. 2018). arXiv:1811.01899

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [30]

    W. B. Gu, Numerical Modeling of Coupled Electrochemical and Transport Processes in Lead-Acid Batteries, J. Electrochem. Soc. 144 (6) (1997) 2053– 2061 (1997). doi:10.1149/1.1837741

    work page doi:10.1149/1.1837741 1997

  30. [31]

    Euler, W

    J. Euler, W. Nonnemacher, Stromverteilung in por¨ osen Elektroden, Elec- trochimica Acta 2 (1960) 268–286 (1960)

    work page 1960

  31. [32]

    J. D. Milshtein, K. M. Tenny, J. L. Barton, J. Drake, R. M. Darling, F. R. Brushett, Quantifying Mass Transfer Rates in Redox Flow Batteries, J. Electrochem. Soc. 164 (11) (2017) E3265–E3275 (2017). doi:10.1149/2. 0201711jes

    work page doi:10.1149/2 2017

  32. [33]

    Newman, Engineering design of electrochemical systems, Ind

    J. Newman, Engineering design of electrochemical systems, Ind. Eng. Chem. 60 (4) (1968) 12–27 (Apr. 1968). doi:10.1021/ie50700a005

    work page doi:10.1021/ie50700a005 1968

  33. [34]

    Newman, Current Distribution and Mass Transfer in Electrochemical Systems, Symp

    J. Newman, Current Distribution and Mass Transfer in Electrochemical Systems, Symp. Electrochem. Process. 11 (1967) 50–54 (1967)

    work page 1967

  34. [35]

    R. E. White, On Newman’s Numerical Technique for Solving Boundary Value Problems, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 17 (4) (1978) 367–369 (Nov. 1978). doi:10.1021/i160068a026

    work page doi:10.1021/i160068a026 1978

  35. [36]

    R. S. Varga, Matrix Iterative Analysis, 2nd Edition, no. 27 in Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, Springer Verlag, Berlin ; New York, 2000 (2000). 18

    work page 2000

  36. [37]

    M. C. Kimble, R. E. White, A five-point finite difference method for solving parabolic partial differential equations, Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 (1990) 921–924 (1990)

    work page 1990

  37. [38]

    Nguyen, R

    T. Nguyen, R. White, A finite difference procedure for solving coupled, nonlinear elliptic partial differential equations, Comput. Chem. Eng. 11 (5) (1987) 543–546 (Oct. 1987). doi:10.1016/0098-1354(87)80029-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0098-1354(87)80029-7 1987

  38. [39]

    Mao, A Finite-Difference Method for Pseudo-Two-Dimensional Bound- ary Value Problems, J

    Z. Mao, A Finite-Difference Method for Pseudo-Two-Dimensional Bound- ary Value Problems, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141 (1) (1994) 151–156 (1994). doi:10.1149/1.2054675

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2054675 1994

  39. [40]

    Preisig, R

    H. Preisig, R. White, On the design of a simple solver for nonlinear two- point boundary value problems, Comput. Chem. Eng. 14 (2) (1990) 179–196 (Feb. 1990). doi:10.1016/0098-1354(90)87077-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0098-1354(90)87077-3 1990

  40. [41]

    G. G. Botte, V. R. Subramanian, R. E. White, Mathematical modeling of secondary lithium batteries, Electrochimica Acta 45 (15-16) (2000) 2595– 2609 (May 2000). doi:10.1016/S0013-4686(00)00340-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0013-4686(00)00340-6 2000

  41. [42]

    S. B. Beale, U. Reimer, D. Froning, H. Jasak, M. Andersson, J. G. Pharoah, W. Lehnert, Stability Issues of Fuel Cell Models in the Activation and Concentration Regimes, J. Electrochem. Energy Convers. Storage 15 (4) (2018) 041008 (May 2018). doi:10.1115/1.4039858

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4039858 2018

  42. [43]

    Takayama, M

    T. Takayama, M. Yoneda, Modeling of thermal and electric behavior of stacked Lithium-ion cells in OpenFOAM, 6th OpenFOAM Workshop, Penn State University, USA (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [44]

    Colli, J

    A. Colli, J. Bisang, Current and potential distribution in electrochemi- cal reactors with activated or resistive electrodes. A multiregion and open source approach, Electrochimica Acta 290 (2018) 676–685 (Nov. 2018). doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.121. 19

    work page doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.121 2018

  44. [45]

    Weber, P

    N. Weber, P. Beckstein, V. Galindo, M. Starace, T. Weier, Electro-vortex flow simulation using coupled meshes, Comput. Fluids 168 (2018) 101–109 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.047 2018

  45. [46]

    R. E. White, Electrochemical Cell Design, Springer US, Boston, MA, 1984 (1984)

    work page 1984

  46. [47]

    E. C. Dimpault-Darcy, Secondary Current Distributions Using TOPAZ2D and Linear Kinetics, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135 (3) (1988) 656–658 (1988). doi:10.1149/1.2095692

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2095692 1988

  47. [48]

    Fan, Modification of Newman’s BAND(J) Subroutine to Multi-Region Systems Containing Interior Boundaries: MBAND, J

    D. Fan, Modification of Newman’s BAND(J) Subroutine to Multi-Region Systems Containing Interior Boundaries: MBAND, J. Electrochem. Soc. 138 (6) (1991) 1688–1691 (1991). doi:10.1149/1.2085854

    work page doi:10.1149/1.2085854 1991

  48. [49]

    Ziegler, A

    C. Ziegler, A. Schmitz, M. Tranitz, E. Fontes, J. O. Schumacher, Mod- eling Planar and Self-Breathing Fuel Cells for Use in Electronic De- vices, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (12) (2004) A2028–A2041 (2004). doi: 10.1149/1.1810451

    work page doi:10.1149/1.1810451 2004

  49. [50]

    Ju, C.-Y

    H. Ju, C.-Y. Wang, Experimental Validation of a PEM Fuel Cell Model by Current Distribution Data, J. Electrochem. Soc. 151 (11) (2004) A1954– A1960 (2004). doi:10.1149/1.1805523

    work page doi:10.1149/1.1805523 2004

  50. [51]

    Karimi-Sibaki, A

    E. Karimi-Sibaki, A. Kharicha, M. Wu, A. Ludwig, J. Bohacek, Contribu- tion of an Electro-Vortex Flow to Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Electric Current Distribution in an Electrolyte, J. Electrochem. Soc. 165 (11) (2018) E604–E615 (2018). doi:10.1149/2.1201811jes

    work page doi:10.1149/2.1201811jes 2018

  51. [52]

    H. G. Weller, G. Tabor, H. Jasak, C. Fureby, A tensorial approach to com- putational continuum mechanics using object-oriented techniques, Comput. Phys. 12 (6) (1998) 620–631 (1998)

    work page 1998

  52. [53]

    C. E. Vallet, Composition Gradients in Electrolyzed LiCl-KCl Eutectic Melts, J. Electrochem. Soc. 130 (12) (1983) 2366–2370 (1983). doi:10. 1149/1.2119588. 20

    work page 1983

  53. [54]

    J. H. Ferziger, M. Peri´ c, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer, 1996 (1996)

    work page 1996

  54. [55]

    Jasak, Error Analysis and Estimation for the Finite Volume Method with Applications to Fluid Flows, Ph.D

    H. Jasak, Error Analysis and Estimation for the Finite Volume Method with Applications to Fluid Flows, Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine (1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [56]

    S. Hill, D. Deising, T. Acher, H. Klein, D. Bothe, H. Marschall, Boundedness-Preserving Implicit Correction of Mesh-Induced Errors for VoF Based Heat and Mass Transfer, J. Comput. Phys. 352 (2018) 285–300 (Jan. 2018). doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.09.027

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2017.09.027 2018

  56. [57]

    Van der Westhuizen, Gradient calculations of non–orthogonal meshes in the finite volume method, PhD Thesis, North-West University (2013)

    N. Van der Westhuizen, Gradient calculations of non–orthogonal meshes in the finite volume method, PhD Thesis, North-West University (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [58]

    Demirdˇ zi´ c, On the Discretization of the Diffusion Term in Finite-Volume Continuum Mechanics, Numer

    I. Demirdˇ zi´ c, On the Discretization of the Diffusion Term in Finite-Volume Continuum Mechanics, Numer. Heat Transf. Part B Fundam. 68 (1) (2015) 1–10 (Jul. 2015). doi:10.1080/10407790.2014.985992

    work page doi:10.1080/10407790.2014.985992 2015

  58. [59]

    H. Kim, D. A. Boysen, J. M. Newhouse, B. L. Spatocco, B. Chung, P. J. Burke, D. J. Bradwell, K. Jiang, A. A. Tomaszowska, K. Wang, W. Wei, L. A. Ortiz, S. A. Barriga, S. M. Poizeau, D. R. Sadoway, Liquid Metal Batteries: Past, Present, and Future, Chem. Rev. 113 (3) (2013) 2075–2099 (Mar. 2013). doi:10.1021/cr300205k

    work page doi:10.1021/cr300205k 2013

  59. [60]

    K. Wang, K. Jiang, B. Chung, T. Ouchi, P. J. Burke, D. A. Boysen, D. J. Bradwell, H. Kim, U. Muecke, D. R. Sadoway, Lithium–antimony–lead liquid metal battery for grid-level energy storage, Nature 514 (7522) (2014) 348–350 (Sep. 2014). doi:10.1038/nature13700

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13700 2014

  60. [61]

    M. S. Foster, S. E. Wood, C. E. Crouthamel, Thermodynamics of Binary Alloys. I. The Lithium-Bismuth System, Inorg. Chem. 3 (10) (1964) 1428– 1431 (1964)

    work page 1964

  61. [62]

    X. Ning, S. Phadke, B. Chung, H. Yin, P. Burke, D. R. Sadoway, Self- healing Li–Bi liquid metal battery for grid-scale energy storage, J. Power 21 Sources 275 (2015) 370–376 (Feb. 2015). doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014. 10.173

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014 2015

  62. [63]

    J. M. Newhouse, Modeling the Operating Voltage of Liquid Metal Battery Cells, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [64]

    Weier, A

    T. Weier, A. Bund, W. El-Mofid, G. M. Horstmann, C.-C. Lalau, S. Land- graf, M. Nimtz, M. Starace, F. Stefani, N. Weber, Liquid metal batteries - materials selection and fluid dynamics, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 228 (2017) 012013 (2017). doi:10.1088/1757-899X/228/1/012013

    work page doi:10.1088/1757-899x/228/1/012013 2017

  64. [65]

    Masset, A

    P. Masset, A. Henry, J.-Y. Poinso, J.-C. Poignet, Ionic conductivity mea- surements of molten iodide-based electrolytes, J. Power Sources 160 (1) (2006) 752–757 (Sep. 2006). doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.014

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.01.014 2006

  65. [66]

    Gasior, Z

    W. Gasior, Z. Moser, W. Zakulski, Bi-Li System. Thermodynamic proper- ties and the phase diagram calculations, Arch. Metall. 39 (4) (1994) 355–364 (1994)

    work page 1994

  66. [67]

    Vegard, Die Konstitution der Mischkristalle und die Raumf¨ ullung der Atome, Z

    L. Vegard, Die Konstitution der Mischkristalle und die Raumf¨ ullung der Atome, Z. F¨ ur Phys. 5 (1921) 17–26 (1921)

    work page 1921

  67. [68]

    Fazio, Handbook on Lead-bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-hydraulics and Technologies, Tech

    C. Fazio, Handbook on Lead-bismuth Eutectic Alloy and Lead Properties, Materials Compatibility, Thermal-hydraulics and Technologies, Tech. Rep. 7268, Nuclear Energy Agency (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [69]

    S. J. Zinkle, Summary of Physical Properties for Lithium, Pb-17Li, and (LiF)n•BeF2 Coolants, in: APEX Study Meeting, Sandia National Labo- ratories, 1998 (1998)

    work page 1998

  69. [70]

    Sobolev, Database of Thermophysical Properties of Liquid Metal Coolants for GEN-IV, SCK CEN, 2010 (2010)

    V. Sobolev, Database of Thermophysical Properties of Liquid Metal Coolants for GEN-IV, SCK CEN, 2010 (2010)

    work page 2010

  70. [71]

    Masset, R

    P. Masset, R. A. Guidotti, Thermal activated (thermal) battery technology, J. Power Sources 164 (1) (2007) 397–414 (Jan. 2007). doi:10.1016/j. jpowsour.2006.10.080. 22

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2007

  71. [72]

    C. J. Smithells, W. F. Gale, T. C. Totemeier, Smithells Metals Reference Book, 8th Edition, Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Amsterdam ; Boston, 2004 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [73]

    Personnettaz, P

    P. Personnettaz, P. Beckstein, S. Landgraf, T. K¨ ollner, M. Nimtz, N. We- ber, T. Weier, Thermally driven convection in Li||Bi liquid metal batteries, J. Power Sources 401 (2018) 362–374 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour. 2018.08.069

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour 2018

  73. [74]

    D. R. Lide (Ed.), CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, CRC Press, 2005 (2005)

    work page 2005

  74. [75]

    Y. Wang, M. Ouyang, Three-dimensional heat and mass transfer analysis in an air-breathing proton exchange membrane fuel cell, J. Power Sources 164 (2) (2007) 721–729 (Feb. 2007). doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.11. 056

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.11 2007

  75. [76]

    D. H. Kelley, T. Weier, Fluid mechanics of liquid metal batteries, Appl. Mech. Rev. 70 (2) (2018) 020801 (2018). doi:10.1115/1.4038699

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4038699 2018

  76. [77]

    Y. Shen, O. Zikanov, Thermal convection in a liquid metal battery, Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 30 (4) (2016) 275–294 (2016). doi:10.1007/ s00162-015-0378-1 . 23

    work page 2016