pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.09299 · v1 · pith:V5NHAQILnew · submitted 2019-06-21 · 🌀 gr-qc

Noncanonical Approaches To Inflation

H\'ector Ram\'irez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 18:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords inflationslow-roll approximationnoncanonical modelsscalar-tensor theoriescosmological perturbationsmodified gravityMukhanov parametrization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generalized Slow-Roll and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques compute inflationary observables more accurately than the standard approximation in both canonical and noncanonical models.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The thesis reviews canonical single-field inflation, model-independent parametrizations such as the Mukhanov approach, and the construction of general scalar-tensor and scalar-vector-tensor theories that yield second-order equations. It then presents Generalized Slow-Roll and Optimized Slow-Roll as methods that extend past the usual slow-roll limit. These techniques produce higher-accuracy values for observables in noncanonical scenarios. A sympathetic reader would care because the methods avoid the need for full numerical integration while still matching observations in a wider class of models.

Core claim

The paper demonstrates that Generalized Slow-Roll and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques move beyond the slow-roll approximation and deliver more accurate computations of inflationary observables in both canonical and noncanonical scenarios.

What carries the argument

Generalized Slow-Roll and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques, which extend the standard slow-roll framework to calculate observables with greater precision without full numerical integration.

If this is right

  • Observables such as the spectral index can be obtained for noncanonical models at higher precision than standard slow-roll allows.
  • The same methods apply equally to canonical single-field cases, unifying the treatment across model classes.
  • Parameter space exploration in scalar-tensor theories becomes feasible without model-by-model numerical tuning.
  • Direct comparison with current observations is possible for a broader set of modified-gravity inflationary models.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The techniques might be tested on existing datasets to see whether they shift the allowed ranges for noncanonical parameters.
  • Similar extensions could be explored for multi-field or higher-order perturbation calculations.
  • If the accuracy gain holds, it would reduce reliance on computationally expensive simulations when scanning large model families.

Load-bearing premise

The new Generalized and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques actually deliver higher accuracy for observables in noncanonical models without requiring full numerical integration or model-specific tuning.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison in a noncanonical model where the new techniques' predictions for the spectral index or tensor-to-scalar ratio deviate from results of full numerical integration by more than the stated accuracy gain.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.09299 by H\'ector Ram\'irez.

Figure 1.1
Figure 1.1. Figure 1.1: Hubble diagram: Velocity-distance relation among galaxies as observed by Edwin Hubble in 1929. The black circles and the solid line give the estimation for individual galaxies whereas white circles and the broken line give the estimation for combined galaxies into groups. The vertical axis is given in units of km/s whereas the horizontal axis is shown in parsecs (1 pc=3.08 × 1016 m). This plot is the ori… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Stages of the evolution of the Universe. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.3. Figure 1.3: Temperature anisotropies and polarization in the Cosmic Microwave Back￾ground. Variations in color indicate variations in temperature: the bluer (redder) regions correspond to colder (hotter) temperatures. On the other hand, the texture pattern rep￾resents the direction of polarized light. The illustration shows the anisotropies at an an￾gular resolution of 5◦ , however, the Planck satellite has reached … view at source ↗
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.4. Figure 1.4: N-body simulation of the dark matter density distribution at t = 13.6 Gyr (today) using the ΛCDM model [59]. It is shown the scale distance of 500 Mpc/h (see §1.2 for details) above which the distribution of matter is clearly homogeneous and isotropic as assumed by the ΛCDM model. N-body simulation of 1010 particles of a dark matter field evolved following the ΛCDM model [59]. 1.2 Dynamics of an expandin… view at source ↗
Figure 1.5
Figure 1.5. Figure 1.5: Left: Planck 2015 constraints in the Ωm − ΩΛ plane [64]. Right: Planck 2018 constraints in the Ωk − Ωm plane [47]. Both constraints are color-coded by the measurement of H0 and are obtained by using CMB (TT, TE and EE), LSS (weak lensing) and BAO observations. the critical one, ρc, 11 as Ω = ρ/ρc, and the equation of state as ω ≡ p/ρ. The curvature parameter is related to Ω as 1 − Ω = − k (aH) 2 . (1.8) … view at source ↗
Figure 1.6
Figure 1.6. Figure 1.6: Light cone. The information coming from an event produced at a given point in spacetime can only travel with finite speed in time-like worldlines. Light-like curves then enclose all the regions that are and will be causally-connected to that event. i.e. a static Minkowski metric (g Mink µν = diag (−1, 1, 1, 1)) rescaled by a(τ ). It is simple to see then that null geodesics are described by straight line… view at source ↗
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.1. Figure 2.1: Evolution of the comoving Hubble radius (aH) −1 . At early times, the horizon was large enough so that observable scales were in causal contact. As inflation took place, the horizon shrank and scales came out to disconnected regions. Inflation then finished and the horizon started to grow to the present size. Two casually-disconnected regions, P and Q, were then in causal contact at some point in the pas… view at source ↗
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.2. Figure 2.2: Conformal diagram including the inflationary epoch. Inflation shifts the initial singularity to τ = −∞ (see Eqs. (2.9)) allowing the light cones of two CMB points, P and Q, which are causally disconnected now, to be causally connected at some point in the past, thus solving the horizon problem. Now, let us discuss how the energy density of a scalar field driving inflation, subject to the slow-roll approx… view at source ↗
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.3. Figure 2.3: Evolution of the inflaton. The inflaton rolls down the potential, inflating the Universe. Once it acquires a large velocity, the slow-roll conditions break and inflation finishes. Afterwards, the inflaton oscillates around the potential’s minimum and reheats the Universe. Note that, in general, φi > φe, so the field decreases towards the right in this sketch. 2.2.2 Slow-roll approximation The conditions … view at source ↗
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.4. Figure 2.4: Evolution for the field φ and the first slow-roll parameters H for the model given in Eq. (2.38) with αc = 1, by solving the background equations (2.16)-(2.18) numerically. The plot is normalized such as the end of inflation H = 1 coincides with N = 55 (gray vertical dashed line). as V ≡ 1 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_2_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.5. Figure 2.5: Planck 2018 constraints on the scalar spectral index ns and the tensor-to￾scalar ratio r at k∗ = 0.002 Mpc−1 from Planck measurements alone and in combination with BK14 or BK14+BAO data. The 68% and 95% CL regions are shown and compared to the theoretical predictions of selected inflationary models. Adapted from [82] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p062_2_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.6. Figure 2.6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p063_2_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: Schematic representation of the effective potential (4.23) for U(φ) ∝ φ 2 . The different lines represent different values of the coupling constant ξ in the function Ω = 1 + ξφ2 , where a larger ξ corresponds to a flatter potential (a less concave one). From the observationally point of view, a flatter potential gives rise to a suppression of the tensor-to-scalar ratio r and, consequently, a larger value… view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Slow-roll parameter H = −H/H ˙ 2 for three different models: the canonical quadratic potential V (φ) = m2φ 2/2 (dotted, orange), the quadratic po￾tential plus G3(φ, X) = −X/(2M3 ) (dash-dotted, green), and a transient model given by G3(φ, X) = −X [1 + tanh ((φ − φr)/d)] /(2M3 ) with {M, m, φr, d} =  1.303 × 10−4 , 2.58 × 10−6 , 13.87, 0.086 . The hyperbolic tangent provides a mechanism to switch off th… view at source ↗
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3. Figure 4.3: Background evolution of the temporal mode A0 and the scalar-field velocity φ˙ , by the end of inflation (N = 55) and during reheating, computed for the model given in Eq. (4.35) and for the potential given in Eq. (2.38) with αc = √ 6/3. Notice that, as expected from Eq. (4.40), the ratio A0/φ˙ remains constant during the whole evolution. for convenience, as we shall see. Furthermore, we can define a resc… view at source ↗
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.4. Figure 4.4: Number of efolds of inflation dN = Hdt, as a function of time rescaled by the vector mass M, for the same specifications than those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p088_4_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this Thesis by publication, we cover both phenomenological and theoretical approaches to the study of inflation: from model-independent parametrizations to modifications of gravity. In a review style, we provide a short introduction to the standard cosmological model and an overview of the dynamics of the canonical single-field inflationary scenario---including the dynamics and evolution of the primordial quantum fluctuations and their signatures on current observations. We then briefly discuss the Mukhanov parametrization, a model-independent approach to study the allowed parameter space of the canonical inflationary scenario. Later, we review the construction of the most general scalar-tensor and scalar-vector-tensor theories of gravity yielding second-order equations of motion, as well as the main models of inflation developed within these frameworks. Finally, we demonstrate new techniques that move beyond the slow-roll approximation---Generalized Slow-roll and Optimized Slow-Roll---to compute the inflationary observables more accurately, in both canonical and noncanonical scenarios. We complement the discussion with detailed appendices on the cosmological perturbation theory and useful expressions for the beyond-GR cosmology. Conclusions are drawn from the results obtained for this Thesis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. This thesis by publication reviews the standard cosmological model and canonical single-field inflation (including primordial fluctuations and observational signatures), discusses the Mukhanov parametrization for model-independent studies, reviews the most general scalar-tensor and scalar-vector-tensor theories yielding second-order equations of motion along with associated inflation models, and demonstrates Generalized Slow-roll and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques that move beyond the standard slow-roll approximation to compute inflationary observables more accurately in both canonical and noncanonical scenarios; it includes appendices on cosmological perturbation theory and beyond-GR expressions.

Significance. If the Generalized and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques are validated to deliver measurably higher accuracy for observables (such as the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio) in noncanonical models with features like varying sound speed, without requiring full numerical integration or model-specific tuning, the work would provide a practical advance for analyzing a broader class of inflationary scenarios beyond the standard slow-roll regime.

major comments (1)
  1. [Demonstration of Generalized/Optimized Slow-Roll techniques (abstract final paragraph and relevant results sections)] The central demonstration (final paragraph of the abstract and associated sections on the new techniques) asserts that Generalized Slow-roll and Optimized Slow-Roll compute inflationary observables more accurately than standard slow-roll in noncanonical scenarios. However, no quantitative error metrics, direct comparisons to exact numerical solutions, or benchmark tests for specific noncanonical examples (e.g., models with varying sound speed) are supplied to substantiate the accuracy gain or to show that the methods avoid case-by-case adjustments.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the thesis and for highlighting this point regarding the demonstration of the Generalized and Optimized Slow-Roll techniques. We address the comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Demonstration of Generalized/Optimized Slow-Roll techniques (abstract final paragraph and relevant results sections)] The central demonstration (final paragraph of the abstract and associated sections on the new techniques) asserts that Generalized Slow-roll and Optimized Slow-Roll compute inflationary observables more accurately than standard slow-roll in noncanonical scenarios. However, no quantitative error metrics, direct comparisons to exact numerical solutions, or benchmark tests for specific noncanonical examples (e.g., models with varying sound speed) are supplied to substantiate the accuracy gain or to show that the methods avoid case-by-case adjustments.

    Authors: The thesis is a review by publication whose primary purpose is to synthesize results from the included papers rather than to present new numerical validations. The abstract's reference to demonstration reflects the analytic derivations and applications to noncanonical models (including those with varying sound speed) shown in the relevant chapters, which illustrate that the techniques extend beyond standard slow-roll without requiring model-specific tuning. We agree, however, that the absence of explicit quantitative error metrics and direct numerical benchmarks in the thesis text itself limits the strength of the claim as presented. We will therefore add a new appendix containing benchmark comparisons for at least one noncanonical example, reporting relative errors in the scalar spectral index and tensor-to-scalar ratio against both standard slow-roll and exact numerical integration. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: techniques presented as independent computational improvements

full rationale

The paper is structured as a review plus demonstration of Generalized and Optimized Slow-Roll methods for computing inflationary observables beyond standard slow-roll. The abstract and provided context frame these as new techniques applied to both canonical and noncanonical scenarios, without any indication that observables are defined in terms of the same fitted quantities they predict or that central claims reduce to self-citations by construction. No load-bearing step is shown to equate a prediction with its input via definition, fitting, or imported uniqueness. The work remains self-contained against external benchmarks as a presentation of methods, consistent with a normal non-circular finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5708 in / 1142 out tokens · 24077 ms · 2026-05-25T18:30:21.502076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

238 extracted references · 238 canonical work pages · 164 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Phenomenological approaches of inflation and their equivalence

    L. Boubekeur, E. Giusarma, O. Mena and H. Ramírez, Phenomenological approaches of inflation and their equivalence, Phys. Rev.D91 (2015) 083006, [1411.7237]. Cited on page v, 50, 93, and 103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  2. [2]

    Does Current Data Prefer a Non-minimally Coupled Inflaton?

    L. Boubekeur, E. Giusarma, O. Mena and H. Ramírez,Do current data prefer a nonminimally coupled inflaton?, Phys. Rev.D91 (2015) 103004, [1502.05193]. Cited on page v, 35, 65, 93, and 104

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    The present and future of the most favoured inflationary models after $Planck$ 2015

    M. Escudero, H. Ramírez, L. Boubekeur, E. Giusarma and O. Mena, The present and future of the most favoured inflationary models after P lanck 2015, JCAP 1602 (2016) 020, [1509.05419]. Cited on page v, 44, 93, and 106

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Reconciling tensor and scalar observables in G-inflation

    H. Ramírez, S. Passaglia, H. Motohashi, W. Hu and O. Mena, Reconciling tensor and scalar observables in G-inflation, JCAP 1804 (2018) 039, [1802.04290]. Cited on page v, 36, 68, 69, 79, 93, 104, and 106

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  5. [5]

    Inflation with mixed helicities and its observational imprint on CMB

    L. Heisenberg, H. Ramírez and S. Tsujikawa,Inflation with mixed helicities and its observational imprint on CMB, Phys. Rev.D99 (2019) 023505, [1812.03340]. Cited on page v, 63, 69, 72, 93, and 105

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Gariazzo, O

    S. Gariazzo, O. Mena, H. Ramírez and L. Boubekeur,Primordial power spectrum features in phenomenological descriptions of inflation, Phys. Dark Univ.17 (2017) 38–45, [1606.00842]. Cited on page vi, and 51

    work page arXiv 2017

  7. [7]

    Gariazzo, O

    S. Gariazzo, O. Mena, V. Miralles, H. Ramírez and L. Boubekeur, Running of featureful primordial power spectra, Phys. Rev.D95 (2017) 123534, [1701.08977]. Cited on page vi

    work page arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Hubble,A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15 (1929) 168–173

    E. Hubble,A relation between distance and radial velocity among extra-galactic nebulae, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15 (1929) 168–173. Cited on page 3, and 4

    work page 1929

  9. [9]

    Ferreira,The Perfect Theory: A Century of Geniuses and the Battle over General Relativity

    P. Ferreira,The Perfect Theory: A Century of Geniuses and the Battle over General Relativity. Little, Brown, 2014. Cited on page 3

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Supernova Search Team collaboration, A. G. Riess et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J.116 (1998) 1009–1038, [astro-ph/9805201]. Cited on page 4. 112 Bibliography

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    Supernova Cosmology Project collaboration, S. Perlmutter et al.,Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 high redshift supernovae, Astrophys. J.517 (1999) 565–586, [astro-ph/9812133]. Cited on page 4

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  12. [12]

    Dodelson,Modern Cosmology

    S. Dodelson,Modern Cosmology. Academic Press, Amsterdam, 2003. Cited on page 4, 5, 10, and 12

    work page 2003

  13. [13]

    Amendola and S

    L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa,Dark Energy. Cambridge University Press, 2015. Cited on page 4, 54, and 57

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner,The Early Universe, Front. Phys.69 (1990) 1–547. Cited on page 5, 7, and 31

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology

    V. Mukhanov,Physical Foundations of Cosmology. Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005. Cited on page 5, 12, 31, 38, 40, 81, and 84

    work page 2005

  16. [16]

    Weinberg,Cosmology

    S. Weinberg,Cosmology. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Pr. (2008) 593 p, 2008. Cited on page 5, 12, 32, and 84

    work page 2008

  17. [17]

    V. A. Rubakov and D. S. Gorbunov,Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe. World Scientific, Singapore, 2017, 10.1142/10447. Cited on page 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 31, and 34

    work page doi:10.1142/10447 2017

  18. [18]

    Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations. Cambridge University Press, 2005. Cited on page 6

    work page 2005

  19. [19]

    Weinberg,The quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg,The quantum theory of fields. Vol. 2: Modern applications. Cambridge University Press, 2013. Cited on page 6

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Patrignani et al.,Review of Particle Physics, Chin

    Particle Data Group collaboration, C. Patrignani et al.,Review of Particle Physics, Chin. Phys.C40 (2016) 100001. Cited on page 6, and 8

    work page 2016

  21. [21]

    D. A. Kirzhnits and A. D. Linde,Macroscopic Consequences of the Weinberg Model, Phys. Lett.42B (1972) 471–474. Cited on page 6

    work page 1972

  22. [22]

    Dolan and R

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw,Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature, Phys. Rev.D9 (1974) 3320–3341. Cited on page 6

    work page 1974

  23. [23]

    Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature, Phys

    S. Weinberg,Gauge and Global Symmetries at High Temperature, Phys. Rev.D9 (1974) 3357–3378. Cited on page 6

    work page 1974

  24. [24]

    Georgi,Unity of all elementary-particle forces, Physical Review Letters 32 (1974) 438–441

    H. Georgi,Unity of all elementary-particle forces, Physical Review Letters 32 (1974) 438–441. Cited on page 6. Bibliography 113

    work page 1974

  25. [25]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout,Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 321–323. Cited on page 7

    work page 1964

  26. [26]

    P. W. Higgs,Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13 (1964) 508–509. Cited on page 7

    work page 1964

  27. [27]

    Fritzsch, M

    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann and H. Leutwyler,Advantages of the Color Octet Gluon Picture, Phys. Lett.47B (1973) 365–368. Cited on page 7

    work page 1973

  28. [28]

    Quigg,Gauge Theories Of The Strong, Weak And Electromagnetic Interactions, Front

    C. Quigg,Gauge Theories Of The Strong, Weak And Electromagnetic Interactions, Front. Phys.56 (1983) 1–334. Cited on page 7

    work page 1983

  29. [29]

    Aspects of Quantum Chromodynamics

    A. Pich,Aspects of quantum chromodynamics, inProceedings, Summer School in Particle Physics: Trieste, Italy, June 21-July 9, 1999, pp. 53–102, 1999.hep-ph/0001118. Cited on page 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  30. [30]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek,Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.30 (1973) 1343–1346. Cited on page 7

    work page 1973

  31. [31]

    H. D. Politzer,Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?, Phys. Rev. Lett.30 (1973) 1346–1349. Cited on page 7

    work page 1973

  32. [32]

    Massive neutrinos and cosmology

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor,Massive neutrinos and cosmology, Phys. Rept.429 (2006) 307–379, [astro-ph/0603494]. Cited on page 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  33. [33]

    Development of a Relic Neutrino Detection Experiment at PTOLEMY: Princeton Tritium Observatory for Light, Early-Universe, Massive-Neutrino Yield

    S. Betts, W. R. Blanchard, R. H. Carnevale, C. Chang, C. Chen, S. Chidzik et al.,Development of a relic neutrino detection experiment at ptolemy: Princeton tritium observatory for light, early-universe, massive-neutrino yield, 1307.4738. Cited on page 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Signatures of Relativistic Neutrinos in CMB Anisotropy and Matter Clustering

    S. Bashinsky and U. Seljak,Signatures of relativistic neutrinos in cmb anisotropy and matter clustering, Phys.Rev.D 69 (2004) 083002, [astro-ph/0310198]. Cited on page 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  35. [35]

    A First Detection of the Acoustic Oscillation Phase Shift Expected from the Cosmic Neutrino Background

    B. Follin, L. Knox, M. Millea and Z. Pan,A first detection of the acoustic oscillation phase shift expected from the cosmic neutrino background, Phys. Rev. Lett.115 (2015) 091301, [1503.07863]. Cited on page 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Baumann, F

    D. Baumann, F. Beutler, R. Flauger, D. Green, A. Slosar, M. Vargas-Magaña et al.,First constraint on the neutrino-induced phase shift in the spectrum of baryon acoustic oscillations, Nature Physics (Feb, 2019) . Cited on page 7. 114 Bibliography

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    R. A. Alpher, H. Bethe and G. Gamow,The origin of chemical elements, Phys. Rev.73 (1948) 803–804. Cited on page 8

    work page 1948

  38. [38]

    R. V. Wagoner, W. A. Fowler and F. Hoyle,On the Synthesis of elements at very high temperatures, Astrophys. J.148 (1967) 3–49. Cited on page 8

    work page 1967

  39. [39]

    B. D. Fields,The primordial lithium problem, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 61 (2011) 47–68, [1203.3551]. Cited on page 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  40. [40]

    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields, K. A. Olive and T.-H. Yeh,Big Bang Nucleosynthesis: 2015, Rev. Mod. Phys.88 (2016) 015004, [1505.01076]. Cited on page 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  41. [41]

    P. J. E. Peebles,Recombination of the Primeval Plasma, Astrophys. J. 153 (1968) 1. Cited on page 8

    work page 1968

  42. [42]

    Ya. B. Zeldovich, V. G. Kurt and R. A. Sunyaev,Recombination of hydrogen in the hot model of the universe, Sov. Phys. JETP28 (1969) 146. Cited on page 8

    work page 1969

  43. [43]

    D. J. Fixsen, E. S. Cheng, J. M. Gales, J. C. Mather, R. A. Shafer and E. L. Wright,The Cosmic Microwave Background spectrum from the full COBE FIRAS data set, Astrophys. J.473 (1996) 576, [astro-ph/9605054]. Cited on page 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  44. [44]

    D. J. Fixsen,The Temperature of the Cosmic Microwave Background, Astrophys. J.707 (2009) 916–920, [0911.1955]. Cited on page 8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    A. A. Penzias and R. W. Wilson,A Measurement of excess antenna temperature at 4080-Mc/s, Astrophys. J.142 (1965) 419–421. Cited on page 8

    work page 1965

  46. [46]

    R. H. Dicke, P. J. E. Peebles, P. G. Roll and D. T. Wilkinson, Cosmic Black-Body Radiation, Astrophys. J.142 (1965) 414–419. Cited on page 9

    work page 1965

  47. [47]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    Planck collaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, 1807.06209. Cited on page 9, 13, and 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    M. J. Rees,Polarization and spectrum of the primeval radiation in an anisotropic universe, The Astrophysical Journal153 (Jul, 1968) L1. Cited on page 10

    work page 1968

  49. [49]

    Negroponte,Polarization of the primeval radiation in an anisotropic universe, Physical Review Letters44 (1980) 1433–1437

    J. Negroponte,Polarization of the primeval radiation in an anisotropic universe, Physical Review Letters44 (1980) 1433–1437. Cited on page 10. Bibliography 115

    work page 1980

  50. [50]

    J. R. Bond and G. Efstathiou,Cosmic background radiation anisotropies in universes dominated by nonbaryonic dark matter, The Astrophysical Journal285 (Oct, 1984) L45. Cited on page 10

    work page 1984

  51. [51]

    Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology

    S. Weinberg,Gravitation and Cosmology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972. Cited on page 10

    work page 1972

  52. [52]

    A Probe of Primordial Gravity Waves and Vorticity

    M. Kamionkowski, A. Kosowsky and A. Stebbins,A Probe of primordial gravity waves and vorticity, Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 2058–2061, [astro-ph/9609132]. Cited on page 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  53. [53]

    Signature of Gravity Waves in Polarization of the Microwave Background

    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga,Signature of gravity waves in polarization of the microwave background, Phys. Rev. Lett.78 (1997) 2054–2057, [astro-ph/9609169]. Cited on page 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  54. [54]

    POLARBEAR collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,A Measurement of the Cosmic Microwave BackgroundB-Mode Polarization Power Spectrum at Sub-Degree Scales from 2 years of POLARBEAR Data, Astrophys. J.848 (2017) 121, [1705.02907]. Cited on page 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  55. [55]

    D. S. Gorbunov and V. A. Rubakov,Introduction to the theory of the early universe: Cosmological perturbations and inflationary theory. 2011, 10.1142/7874. Cited on page 11, 32, and 87

    work page doi:10.1142/7874 2011

  56. [56]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys.Rept.405 (2005) 279–390, [hep-ph/0404175]. Cited on page 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  57. [57]

    Dark Matter Evidence, Particle Physics Candidates and Detection Methods

    L. Bergström,Dark matter evidence, particle physics candidates and detection methods, 1205.4882. Cited on page 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  58. [58]

    Snowmass-2013 Cosmic Frontier 3 (CF3) Working Group Summary: Non-WIMP dark matter

    A. Kusenko and L. J. Rosenberg,Snowmass-2013 cosmic frontier 3 (cf3) working group summary: Non-wimp dark matter, 1310.8642. Cited on page 11

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution

    V. Springel et al.,Simulating the joint evolution of quasars, galaxies and their large-scale distribution, Nature 435 (2005) 629–636, [astro-ph/0504097]. Cited on page 12

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  60. [60]

    D. Baumann,Inflation, inPhysics of the large and the small, TASI 09, proceedings of the Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 1-26 June 2009, pp. 523–686, 2011.0907.5424. DOI. Cited on page 12, 19, 38, 81, and 87

    work page arXiv 2009

  61. [61]

    TASI Lectures on Primordial Cosmology

    D. Baumann,Primordial Cosmology, PoS TASI2017(2018) 009, [1807.03098]. Cited on page 12. 116 Bibliography

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    P. J. E. Peebles,Principles of physical cosmology. Princeton, USA: Univ. Pr. (1993) 718 p, 1994. Cited on page 14

    work page 1993

  63. [63]

    Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements

    Ã. Aubourg et al.,Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, Phys. Rev.D92 (2015) 123516, [1411.1074]. Cited on page 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  64. [64]

    Planck collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.594 (2016) A13, [1502.01589]. Cited on page 14

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev.D23 (1981) 347–356. Cited on page 21

    work page 1981

  66. [66]

    A. H. Guth and E. J. Weinberg,Cosmological Consequences of a First Order Phase Transition in the SU(5) Grand Unified Model, Phys. Rev.D23 (1981) 876. Cited on page 22

    work page 1981

  67. [67]

    G. P. Cook and K. T. Mahanthappa,Supercooling in the SU(5) Phase Transitions and Magnetic Monopole Suppression, Phys. Rev. D23 (1981) 1321. Cited on page 22

    work page 1981

  68. [68]

    J. D. Barrow and M. S. Turner,Inflation in the Universe, Nature 292 (1981) 35–38. Cited on page 22

    work page 1981

  69. [69]

    A. Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Physics Letters B108 (1982) 389 – 393. Cited on page 22, and 33

    work page 1982

  70. [70]

    Albrecht,Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking, Physical Review Letters48 (1982) 1220–1223

    A. Albrecht,Cosmology for grand unified theories with radiatively induced symmetry breaking, Physical Review Letters48 (1982) 1220–1223. Cited on page 22, and 33

    work page 1982

  71. [71]

    V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe, JETP Lett.33 (1981) 532–535. Cited on page 22

    work page 1981

  72. [72]

    Hawking,The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe, Physics Letters B115 (1982) 295 – 297

    S. Hawking,The development of irregularities in a single bubble inflationary universe, Physics Letters B115 (1982) 295 – 297. Cited on page 22

    work page 1982

  73. [73]

    Starobinsky,Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, Physics Letters B 117 (1982) 175 – 178

    A. Starobinsky,Dynamics of phase transition in the new inflationary universe scenario and generation of perturbations, Physics Letters B 117 (1982) 175 – 178. Cited on page 22. Bibliography 117

    work page 1982

  74. [74]

    A. H. Guth,Fluctuations in the new inflationary universe, Physical Review Letters49 (1982) 1110–1113. Cited on page 22

    work page 1982

  75. [75]

    J. M. Bardeen,Spontaneous creation of almost scale-free density perturbations in an inflationary universe, Physical Review D28 (1983) 679–693. Cited on page 22

    work page 1983

  76. [76]

    A. H. Guth,The inflationary universe: The quest for a new theory of cosmic origins. 1997. Cited on page 22

    work page 1997

  77. [77]

    Towards the Theory of Reheating After Inflation

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky,Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev.D56 (1997) 3258–3295, [hep-ph/9704452]. Cited on page 31

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  78. [78]

    B. A. Bassett, S. Tsujikawa and D. Wands,Inflation dynamics and reheating, Rev.Mod.Phys.78 (2006) 537–589, [astro-ph/0507632]. Cited on page 31

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  79. [79]

    D. H. Lyth and A. R. Liddle,The primordial density perturbation: Cosmology, inflation and the origin of structure. 2009. Cited on page 31, 32, and 34

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval and V. Vennin,Encyclopdia Inflationaris, Phys. Dark Univ.5-6 (2014) 75–235, [1303.3787]. Cited on page 32

    work page arXiv 2014

Showing first 80 references.