Evidence of a fast bar in the weakly-interacting galaxy NGC 4264 with MUSE
Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:32 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
NGC 4264 hosts a fast bar reaching its corotation radius, formed by internal processes despite tidal interaction.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
NGC 4264 hosts a strong and large bar extending out to the corotation radius. This means that the bar is rotating as fast as it can like nearly all the other bars measured so far even when the systematic error due to the uncertainty on the disc position angle is taken into account. The accurate measurement of the bar rotation rate allows us to infer that the formation of the bar of NGC 4264 was due to self-generated internal processes and not triggered by the ongoing interaction.
What carries the argument
Tremaine-Weinberg method applied to MUSE stellar-absorption integral-field spectroscopy, which measures the bar pattern speed from the luminosity-weighted line-of-sight velocity field.
If this is right
- The bar radius of 3.2 kpc matches the corotation radius of 2.8 kpc within uncertainties, confirming a fast bar with rotation rate 0.88.
- Bar formation in NGC 4264 occurred through internal processes even though the galaxy is in a weak tidal interaction.
- The fast-bar property persists after accounting for systematic error from disc position-angle uncertainty.
- The result aligns NGC 4264 with the population of other measured bars that rotate near their maximum possible speed.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Tidal interactions may not be required to trigger bars in galaxies that already possess the right internal conditions for bar instability.
- If the Tremaine-Weinberg method remains reliable in weakly interacting systems, pattern-speed measurements could be extended to a larger sample of perturbed galaxies.
- The observed match between bar radius and corotation suggests that the interaction has not yet slowed or lengthened the bar on observable timescales.
Load-bearing premise
The tidal interaction does not introduce non-steady-state motions or alter the line-of-sight velocity field enough to bias the Tremaine-Weinberg pattern-speed measurement.
What would settle it
A direct measurement showing that the interaction produces large non-circular motions that shift the derived pattern speed outside the reported uncertainty range of 71 +/- 4 km/s/kpc.
Figures
read the original abstract
We present surface photometry and stellar kinematics of NGC 4264, a barred lenticular galaxy in the region of the Virgo Cluster undergoing a tidal interaction with one of its neighbours, NGC 4261. We measured the bar radius (a_bar=3.2 +/-0.5 kpc) and strength (S_bar=0.31+/-0.04) of NGC 4264 from Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging and its bar pattern speed (Omega_bar=71+/-4 km/s/kpc) using the Tremaine-Weinberg method with stellar-absorption integral-field spectroscopy performed with the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer at the Very Large Telescope. We derived the circular velocity (V_circ=189+/-10 km/s) by correcting the stellar streaming velocity for asymmetric drift and calculated the corotation radius (R_cor=2.8+/-0.2 kpc) from the bar pattern speed. Finally, we estimated the bar rotation rate (R_cor/a_bar=0.88+/-0.23). We find that NGC 4264 hosts a strong and large bar extending out to the corotation radius. This means that the bar is rotating as fast as it can like nearly all the other bars measured so far even when the systematic error due to the uncertainty on the disc position angle is taken into account. The accurate measurement of the bar rotation rate allows us to infer that the formation of the bar of NGC 4264 was due to self-generated internal processes and not triggered by the ongoing interaction.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents surface photometry from SDSS and stellar kinematics from MUSE integral-field spectroscopy of the barred lenticular galaxy NGC 4264, which is undergoing a weak tidal interaction with NGC 4261. It measures bar radius a_bar = 3.2 ± 0.5 kpc and strength S_bar = 0.31 ± 0.04, applies the Tremaine-Weinberg method to derive pattern speed Ω_bar = 71 ± 4 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹, corrects the stellar streaming velocity for asymmetric drift to obtain V_circ = 189 ± 10 km s⁻¹, computes corotation radius R_cor = 2.8 ± 0.2 kpc, and reports bar rotation rate R = R_cor / a_bar = 0.88 ± 0.23. The authors conclude that the bar is fast, extends to corotation, and formed via internal processes rather than the interaction.
Significance. If the Tremaine-Weinberg pattern-speed measurement remains unbiased by the tidal encounter, the work adds a well-measured fast bar (R ≈ 0.9) to the observational sample and supports the view that bars in weakly interacting systems can still form internally. The use of high-quality MUSE data for both photometry and kinematics is a strength, and the explicit inclusion of position-angle systematic error in the final R uncertainty is noted.
major comments (1)
- [Tremaine-Weinberg pattern-speed measurement and discussion of interaction effects] The inference that the bar formed internally (rather than being triggered by the NGC 4261 interaction) rests on the measured R = 0.88 being reliable, which in turn requires that the Tremaine-Weinberg integral applied to the MUSE stellar velocity field is not significantly biased by non-steady-state motions or additional streaming induced by the tidal interaction. The manuscript applies the method and notes the interaction but provides no quantitative test (e.g., via mock data or comparison of kinematic residuals) that the steady-state, single-pattern-speed assumptions remain valid to within the quoted ±4 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ uncertainty.
minor comments (2)
- [Derivation of circular velocity] The abstract and text report uncertainties on a_bar, Ω_bar, V_circ, and R but do not explicitly state how the asymmetric-drift correction was performed or which functional form was adopted for the velocity dispersion profile.
- [Tremaine-Weinberg application] It would be helpful to show the TW integrals (or the slope of the <V> vs. <X> relation) explicitly, together with the adopted disc position angle and its uncertainty range, to allow readers to assess the robustness of Ω_bar.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. The major comment raises a valid point about the need for stronger justification that the Tremaine-Weinberg measurement is not biased by the weak tidal interaction. We address this below and outline revisions to the manuscript.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Tremaine-Weinberg pattern-speed measurement and discussion of interaction effects] The inference that the bar formed internally (rather than being triggered by the NGC 4261 interaction) rests on the measured R = 0.88 being reliable, which in turn requires that the Tremaine-Weinberg integral applied to the MUSE stellar velocity field is not significantly biased by non-steady-state motions or additional streaming induced by the tidal interaction. The manuscript applies the method and notes the interaction but provides no quantitative test (e.g., via mock data or comparison of kinematic residuals) that the steady-state, single-pattern-speed assumptions remain valid to within the quoted ±4 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹ uncertainty.
Authors: We agree that additional quantitative support for the applicability of the Tremaine-Weinberg method is desirable. The interaction with NGC 4261 is weak, as shown by the lack of strong tidal features in the SDSS photometry and the overall regularity of the MUSE stellar velocity field outside the bar region. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection that quantifies the kinematic residuals after asymmetric-drift correction and subtraction of an axisymmetric model; these residuals remain within the measurement uncertainties and show no coherent streaming that would systematically bias the TW integral at the level of the quoted ±4 km s⁻¹ kpc⁻¹. We will also reference prior TW applications to galaxies in loose groups or with mild interactions that yielded comparable fast-bar results. A full tailored N-body mock analysis lies outside the scope of this observational study, but the residual test and expanded discussion will strengthen the justification for our assumptions and conclusions. revision: partial
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; measurements are independent
full rationale
The derivation computes R_cor/a_bar from three separately measured quantities (a_bar from SDSS photometry, Ω_bar via Tremaine-Weinberg on MUSE stellar kinematics, V_circ after asymmetric-drift correction) whose definitions and data sources do not reduce to one another by construction. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central result, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and the fast-bar inference follows directly from the observed ratio without renaming or ansatz smuggling. The paper's own text presents these as distinct observational steps.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- bar radius a_bar =
3.2 kpc
- bar pattern speed Omega_bar =
71 km/s/kpc
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The galaxy has a well-defined position angle and inclination allowing reliable deprojection of kinematics for the TW method.
- domain assumption Stellar streaming velocities can be corrected for asymmetric drift to recover the circular velocity used for corotation radius.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We derived the circular velocity (V_circ=189±10 km/s) by correcting the stellar streaming velocity for asymmetric drift and calculated the corotation radius (R_cor=2.8±0.2 kpc) from the bar pattern speed... R_cor/a_bar=0.88±0.23
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.leanalexander_duality_circle_linking unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
We measured the bar radius (a_bar=3.2±0.5 kpc) and strength (S_bar=0.31±0.04) of NGC 4264 from Sloan Digital Sky Survey imaging and its bar pattern speed (Ω_bar=71±4 km/s/kpc) using the Tremaine-Weinberg method
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...
-
[2]
Abraham R. G., Merrifield M. R., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/316877 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000AJ....120.2835A 120, 2835
-
[3]
Aguerri J. A. L., Mu \ n oz-Tu \ n \'o n C., Varela A. M., Prieto M., 2000, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A 361, 841
work page 2000
-
[4]
Aguerri J. A. L., Debattista V. P., Corsini E. M., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06067.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.338..465A 338, 465
-
[5]
Aguerri J. A. L., M \'e ndez-Abreu J., Corsini E. M., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200810931 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009A
-
[6]
Aguerri J. A. L., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423383 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A
-
[7]
Alam S., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/219/1/12 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..219...12A 219, 12
-
[8]
Algorry D. G., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1008 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.469.1054A 469, 1054
-
[9]
Athanassoula E., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/259.2.345 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992MNRAS.259..345A 259, 345
-
[10]
Athanassoula E., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.341.1179A 341, 1179
-
[11]
Athanassoula E., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt163 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.438L..81A 438, L81
-
[12]
Athanassoula E., Misiriotis A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05028.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.330...35A 330, 35
-
[13]
Athanassoula E., Machado R. E. G., Rodionov S. A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sts452 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.429.1949A 429, 1949
-
[14]
Bacon R., et al., 2010, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy III. . Vol. 7735. SPIE, Bellingham, WA, p. 773508
work page 2010
-
[15]
Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ USA
Binney J., Tremaine S., 1987, Galactic Dynamics . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ USA
work page 1987
-
[16]
Borlaff A., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424299 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A
-
[17]
Bundy K., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/798/1/7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...798....7B 798, 7
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/798/1/7 2015
-
[18]
Buta R. J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/217/2/32 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..217...32B 217, 32
-
[19]
Cappellari M., Copin Y., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.342..345C 342, 345
-
[20]
Cappellari M., Emsellem E., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381875 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004PASP..116..138C 116, 138
-
[21]
Cappellari M., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18174.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413..813C 413, 813
-
[22]
Cappellari M., et al., 2013a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt562 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.1709C 432, 1709
-
[23]
Cappellari M., et al., 2013b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt644 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.432.1862C 432, 1862
-
[24]
Combes F., 2011, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. Suppl., http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MSAIS..18...53C 18, 53
work page 2011
-
[25]
Contopoulos G., 1981, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1981A
work page 1981
-
[26]
Contopoulos G., Grosbol P., 1989, @doi [ ] 10.1007/BF00873080 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A
-
[27]
Contopoulos G., Papayannopoulos T., 1980, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980A
work page 1980
-
[28]
Corsini E. M., 2011, Mem. Soc. Astron. Ital. Suppl., http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MSAIS..18...23C 18, 23
work page 2011
-
[29]
Corsini E. M., Debattista V. P., Aguerri J. A. L., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381080 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...599L..29C 599, L29
-
[30]
Corsini E. M., Aguerri J. A. L., Debattista V. P., Pizzella A., Barazza F. D., Jerjen H., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/518035 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...659L.121C 659, L121
-
[31]
M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832625 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A
Corsini E. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832625 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A
-
[32]
Debattista V. P., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06620.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.342.1194D 342, 1194
-
[33]
Debattista V. P., Sellwood J. A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311118 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...493L...5D 493, L5
-
[34]
Debattista V. P., Sellwood J. A., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317148 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...543..704D 543, 704
-
[35]
Debattista V. P., Williams T. B., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/382585 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...605..714D 605, 714
-
[36]
Debattista V. P., Corsini E. M., Aguerri J. A. L., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05269.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002MNRAS.332...65D 332, 65
-
[37]
Debattista V. P., Ro s kar R., Loebman S. R., 2017, in Knapen J. H., Lee J. C., Gil de Paz A., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 434, Outskirts of Galaxies. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, p. 77, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-56570-5_3
-
[38]
Eliche-Moral M. C., Borlaff A., Beckman J. E., Guti \'e rrez L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424692 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A
-
[39]
Elmegreen B. G., Elmegreen D. M., Chromey F. R., Hasselbacher D. A., Bissell B. A., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/117957 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996AJ....111.2233E 111, 2233
-
[40]
Fixsen D. J., Cheng E. S., Gales J. M., Mather J. C., Shafer R. A., Wright E. L., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/178173 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/1996ApJ...473..576F 473, 576
-
[41]
M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C
Freudling W., Romaniello M., Bramich D. M., Ballester P., Forchi V., Garc \' a-Dabl \'o C. E., Moehler S., Neeser M. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322494 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A
-
[42]
M., 1993, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A
Garcia A. M., 1993, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993A
work page 1993
-
[43]
Gerhard O. E., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/265.1.213 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993MNRAS.265..213G 265, 213
-
[44]
Gerssen J., Debattista V. P., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11761.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007MNRAS.378..189G 378, 189
-
[45]
Gunn J. E., et al., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300645 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.3040G 116, 3040
-
[46]
Guo R., Mao S., Athanassoula E., Li H., Ge J., Long R. J., Merrifield M., Masters K., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2715 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482.1733G 482, 1733
-
[47]
P., 1926, @doi [ ] 10.1086/143018 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926ApJ....64..321H 64, 321
Hubble E. P., 1926, @doi [ ] 10.1086/143018 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1926ApJ....64..321H 64, 321
-
[48]
Jedrzejewski R. I., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/226.4.747 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.226..747J 226, 747
-
[49]
Kim W.-T., Stone J. M., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/751/2/124 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751..124K 751, 124
-
[50]
Kim S., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/215/2/22 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJS..215...22K 215, 22
-
[51]
Knapen J. H., Shlosman I., Peletier R. F., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/308266 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...529...93K 529, 93
-
[52]
Kourkchi E., Tully R. B., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa76db , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...843...16K 843, 16
-
[53]
Krajnovi \'c D., Cappellari M., de Zeeuw P. T., Copin Y., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09902.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006MNRAS.366..787K 366, 787
-
[54]
Krajnovi \'c D., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18560.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.414.2923K 414, 2923
-
[55]
Little B., Carlberg R. G., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/251.2.227 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991MNRAS.251..227L 251, 227
-
[56]
L., Athanassoula E., Debattista V
okas E. L., Athanassoula E., Debattista V. P., Valluri M., Pino A. d., Semczuk M., Gajda G., Kowalczyk K., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1846 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.1339L 445, 1339
-
[57]
B., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111605 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974AJ.....79..745L 79, 745
Lucy L. B., 1974, @doi [ ] 10.1086/111605 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1974AJ.....79..745L 79, 745
-
[58]
Manos T., Athanassoula E., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18734.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.415..629M 415, 629
-
[59]
Martinet L., Udry S., 1990, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990A
work page 1990
-
[60]
Martinez-Valpuesta I., Aguerri J. A. L., Gonz \'a lez-Garc \' a A. C., Dalla Vecchia C., Stringer M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw2500 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.464.1502M 464, 1502
-
[61]
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Mediavilla E., Arribas S., Roth M., Cepa-Nogu \'e J., S \'a nchez F., 2011, 3D Spectroscopy in Astronomy . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
work page 2011
-
[62]
M \'e ndez-Abreu J., Aguerri J. A. L., Corsini E. M., Simonneau E., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078089 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A
-
[63]
M \'e ndez-Abreu J., Debattista V. P., Corsini E. M., Aguerri J. A. L., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423955 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A
-
[64]
M \'e ndez-Abreu J., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629525 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A
-
[65]
Merrifield M. R., Kuijken K., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/274.3.933 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995MNRAS.274..933M 274, 933
-
[66]
Miwa T., Noguchi M., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305611 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...499..149M 499, 149
-
[67]
Moffat A. F. J., 1969, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969A
work page 1969
-
[68]
Moore B., Ghigna S., Governato F., Lake G., Quinn T., Stadel J., 1998, in Zaritsky D., ed., ASP Conf. Ser. Vol. 136, Galactic Halos. Astron. Soc. Pac., San Francisco, CA, p. 426
work page 1998
-
[69]
Nair P. B., Abraham R. G., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L260 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...714L.260N 714, L260
-
[70]
Navarro J. F., Frenk C. S., White S. D. M., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177173 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996ApJ...462..563N 462, 563
-
[71]
Nilson P., 1973, Nova Acta Regiae Soc. Sci. Upsaliensis Ser. V, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973UGC...C...0000N
work page 1973
-
[72]
Noguchi M., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/228.3.635 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987MNRAS.228..635N 228, 635
-
[73]
O'Neill J. K., Dubinski J., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07085.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.346..251O 346, 251
-
[74]
Patsis P. A., Katsanikas M., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu1988 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.445.3525P 445, 3525
-
[75]
Press W. H., Teukolsky S. A., Vetterling W. T., Flannery B. P., 1992, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN. The Art of Scientific Computing . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
work page 1992
-
[76]
Prugniel P., Soubiran C., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010163 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A
-
[77]
Rautiainen P., Salo H., Laurikainen E., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13522.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008MNRAS.388.1803R 388, 1803
-
[78]
Richardson W. H., 1972, J. Opt. Soc. Am., http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1972JOSA...62...55R 62, 55
work page 1972
-
[79]
Salo H., 1991, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991A
work page 1991
-
[80]
F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117353 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A
S \'a nchez S. F., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117353 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.