pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.10133 · v1 · pith:PVAYJGTUnew · submitted 2019-06-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.supr-con

Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel

Berthold J\"ack , Yonglong Xie , Jian Li , Sangjun Jeon , B. Andrei Bernevig , Ali Yazdani This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 17:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Majorana zero modehelical edge statestopological insulatorproximity superconductivityscanning tunneling microscopybismuth filmsmagnetic clustersspin signature
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scanning tunneling microscopy reveals a localized Majorana zero mode at the interface between a superconducting helical edge channel and magnetic clusters in Bi(111) films.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines bismuth films grown on a niobium superconductor and patterned with iron clusters using scanning tunneling microscopy. Proximity-induced superconductivity and local magnetism interact with the film's topologically protected helical hinge states to produce a zero-energy state at specific interfaces. The measurements capture both the spatial localization of this state and its characteristic spin texture. This combination allows the zero mode to be identified as a Majorana zero mode rather than a trivial in-gap state.

Core claim

Our measurements reveal the emergence of a localized MZM at the interface between the superconducting helical edge channel and the Fe clusters with strong magnetization component along the edge. Our experiments also resolve the MZM spin signature that distinguishes it from trivial in-gap states that may accidently occur at zero energy in a superconductor.

What carries the argument

Proximity-induced superconductivity from the Nb substrate combined with local magnetism from Fe clusters acting on the helical hinge states of Bi(111), localizing a zero-energy mode whose spin texture confirms its Majorana character.

If this is right

  • The Majorana zero mode appears only at the specific interface where the helical edge meets a region of strong edge-aligned magnetization.
  • The resolved spin signature provides a direct experimental handle to separate the Majorana mode from accidental zero-energy states.
  • Consistency between the data and model calculations supports the interpretation that topological protection of the edge channel is essential to the observed localization.
  • This hybrid platform combines induced pairing, magnetism, and helical topology without requiring electrostatic gating to stabilize the zero mode.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Engineering arrays of such Fe clusters along the edge could create multiple addressable Majorana modes whose interactions might be tuned by cluster spacing.
  • The spin-resolved STM technique demonstrated here could be applied to other helical-edge systems to test for Majorana signatures under different material combinations.
  • If the interface remains stable under further processing, the approach might allow networks of Majorana modes to be fabricated for interference or braiding experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The zero-bias feature and its spin texture are produced by proximity-induced superconductivity and magnetism acting on the helical hinge states rather than by unrelated disorder or trivial Andreev bound states.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the zero-bias peak and spin polarization remain unchanged when the direction of the Fe cluster magnetization is rotated away from alignment with the edge would indicate the feature is not the predicted Majorana mode.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.10133 by Ali Yazdani, B. Andrei Bernevig, Berthold J\"ack, Jian Li, Sangjun Jeon, Yonglong Xie.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: While we find some clusters at the center of a B edge (see Sec. 10 and Fig. S14 & S15 of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Topological Superconductivity and Majorana Zero [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Structural and Electronic Properties of Bi(111) thin films. (A) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Spin polarized measurements on Fe cluster and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Localized ZBP at the interface. (A) Topography of a Bi step edge decorated with Fe cluster #2. (B) Spectroscopic line cut taken along the purple dashed line shown in (A) (Vset = 5 mV, Iset = 1 nA, Vmod = 40 V). (C) Individual point spectra at locations indicated by triangular markers in (B). For clarity, the spectra are offset from each other by 45nS. (D) Simultaneously measured tunnel conductance dI/dV a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spin polarization of MZM and Shiba states. (A and B) dI/dV spectra on the Fe cluster (A) and at the interface (B) as well as their corresponding spin polarizations (Vset=-5 mV, Iset=1 nA, Vmod=40 V). Yellow and blue curves are taken with ‘Up’ and ‘Down’ polarized tips, respectively. Red arrows mark the zero-bias end state and black arrows mark the van-Hove singularity of the Shiba band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Superconducting proximity pairing in helical edge modes, such as those of topological insulators (TI), is predicted to provide a unique platform for realizing Majorana zero modes (MZMs). We use scanning tunneling microscopy measurements to probe the influence of proximity induced superconductivity and magnetism on the helical hinge states of Bi(111) films, grown on a superconducting Nb substrate and decorated with magnetic Fe clusters. Consistent with model calculations, our measurements reveal the emergence of a localized MZM at the interface between the superconducting helical edge channel and the Fe clusters with strong magnetization component along the edge. Our experiments also resolve the MZM spin signature that distinguishes it from trivial in-gap states that may accidently occur at zero energy in a superconductor.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports STM measurements on Bi(111) films grown on superconducting Nb and decorated with Fe clusters. It claims that proximity-induced superconductivity and magnetism on the helical hinge states produce a localized Majorana zero mode (MZM) at the Fe-cluster interface, with the observed zero-bias feature and its spin texture matching model calculations and distinguishable from trivial in-gap states.

Significance. If the central interpretation is robust, the result would constitute direct experimental evidence for an MZM hosted in a topologically protected helical edge channel, strengthening the case for engineered topological superconductivity in TI systems. The work explicitly invokes consistency with model calculations and a spin-signature diagnostic, both of which are positive features when fully documented.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the measured spin signature 'distinguishes it from trivial in-gap states' is load-bearing for the central interpretation, yet the abstract supplies neither the quantitative spin-texture data, error bars, nor the explicit model predictions (including disorder and ABS realizations) used to establish uniqueness. Without these, the distinction cannot be verified from the given text.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement 'consistent with model calculations' is invoked to support the MZM assignment, but no parameter ranges, disorder ensembles, or coverage of plausible trivial Andreev-bound-state configurations are reported. If the models omit configurations that can reproduce both the zero-bias peak and the observed spin texture, the interpretation does not follow.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive comments. We address the two major comments on the abstract below, noting that abstracts are concise summaries while supporting quantitative details appear in the main text and supplementary information.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the measured spin signature 'distinguishes it from trivial in-gap states' is load-bearing for the central interpretation, yet the abstract supplies neither the quantitative spin-texture data, error bars, nor the explicit model predictions (including disorder and ABS realizations) used to establish uniqueness. Without these, the distinction cannot be verified from the given text.

    Authors: We agree the abstract itself does not contain the quantitative spin-texture values, error bars or full model comparisons; those reside in the main text (spin-resolved dI/dV maps, extracted polarization angles, and direct overlays with MZM versus trivial ABS simulations) and supplementary material. The abstract summarizes the central result. If the editor prefers, we will add a short clause such as 'supported by spin-texture analysis that excludes trivial zero-energy states' while respecting length limits. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement 'consistent with model calculations' is invoked to support the MZM assignment, but no parameter ranges, disorder ensembles, or coverage of plausible trivial Andreev-bound-state configurations are reported. If the models omit configurations that can reproduce both the zero-bias peak and the observed spin texture, the interpretation does not follow.

    Authors: The abstract invokes consistency without enumerating ranges or ensembles; those are documented in the body and SI, where we scan chemical potential, pairing strength, magnetization orientation and include disorder realizations plus multiple trivial ABS geometries. None of the trivial cases simultaneously reproduce both the zero-bias localization and the measured spin texture. We can revise the abstract to read 'robustly consistent with MZM calculations that exclude trivial Andreev states' if space permits. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental observation paper with no derivation chain that reduces to inputs by construction

full rationale

This is an experimental STM paper reporting zero-bias peaks and spin textures interpreted as MZMs on helical hinge states. The abstract and provided text contain no equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains that bear the central claim. Model calculations are invoked only for consistency checks, not as the origin of the result. No load-bearing step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns; the result is data-driven rather than derived from a closed mathematical loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the assumption that the helical hinge states of Bi(111) remain intact under proximity superconductivity and local magnetism, and that the observed zero-energy feature with its spin texture cannot be produced by any non-Majorana mechanism. No free parameters are explicitly introduced in the abstract. The Majorana zero mode itself is the central postulated entity whose existence is being tested.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Helical hinge states of Bi(111) films survive proximity to superconducting Nb and local Fe magnetism
    Invoked when the abstract states that the edge channel is superconducting and hosts the MZM
  • domain assumption Spin signature of the zero-bias state uniquely identifies it as an MZM rather than a trivial in-gap state
    Stated directly in the abstract as the distinguishing feature
invented entities (1)
  • Majorana zero mode independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the observed localized zero-energy state with specific spin texture
    The MZM is the entity whose presence is claimed; the abstract asserts it is distinguished by spin signature, providing a falsifiable handle within the experiment itself

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1515 out tokens · 36715 ms · 2026-05-25T17:06:23.079058+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Ann. Phys. 303, 2–30 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Nayak et al., Rev

    C. Nayak et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008)

    work page 2008

  3. [3]

    Mourik et al., Science 336, 1003–1007 (2012)

    V. Mourik et al., Science 336, 1003–1007 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Nadj-Perge et al., Science 346, 602-607 (2014)

    S. Nadj-Perge et al., Science 346, 602-607 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    M. T. Deng et al., Science 354, 1557-1562 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Jeon et al., Science 358, 772–776 (2017)

    S. Jeon et al., Science 358, 772–776 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Nichele et al., Phys

    F. Nichele et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 136803 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Zhang et al., Nature 556, 74–79 (2018)

    H. Zhang et al., Nature 556, 74–79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    A. Y. Kitaev, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131–136 (2001)

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    R. M. Lutchyn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Oreg et al., Phys

    Y. Oreg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Nadj-Perge et al., Phys

    S. Nadj-Perge et al., Phys. Rev. B 88, 020407 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Pientka et al., Phys

    F. Pientka et al., Phys. Rev. B 88, 155420 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Klinovaja et al., Phys

    J. Klinovaja et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 186805 (2013)

    work page 2013

  15. [15]

    Fu et al., Phys

    L. Fu et al., Phys. Rev. B 79, 161408 R (2009)

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Rainis et al., Phys

    D. Rainis et al., Phys. Rev. B 85, 174553 (2012)

    work page 2012

  17. [17]

    Murakami et al., Phys

    S. Murakami et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 236805 (2006)

    work page 2006

  18. [18]

    Benalcazar et al., Science 357, 61-66 (2017)

    W.A. Benalcazar et al., Science 357, 61-66 (2017)

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Benalcazar et al., Phys

    W.A. Benalcazar et al., Phys. Rev. B 96, 245115 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Langbehn et al., Phys

    J. Langbehn et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246401 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    Song et al., Phys

    Z. Song et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 246402 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    Schindler et al., Science Advances 4, eaat0346 (2018)

    F. Schindler et al., Science Advances 4, eaat0346 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Schindler et al., Nature Phys

    F. Schindler et al., Nature Phys. 14, 918–924 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    I. K. Drozdov et al., Nature Phys. 10, 664–669 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    Murani et al., Nature Comms

    A. Murani et al., Nature Comms. 8, 15941 EP (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Mi et al., Phys

    S. Mi et al., Phys. Rev. B 87, 241405(R) (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    Hsu et al., Phys

    C.H. Hsu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 196801 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Splitting the hinge mode of higher-order topological insulators

    R. Queiroz et al., arXiv:1807.04141 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Sun et al., Nano Lett

    H.-H. Sun et al., Nano Lett. 17, 3035–3039 (2017)

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Supplementary Material

    work page

  31. [31]

    Yazdani et al., Science 275, 1767–1770 (1997)

    A. Yazdani et al., Science 275, 1767–1770 (1997)

    work page 1997

  32. [32]

    A. V. Balatsky et al., Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 373-433 (2006)

    work page 2006

  33. [33]

    Wang et al., Science 362, 333 – 335 (2018)

    D. Wang et al., Science 362, 333 – 335 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Zero-energy vortex bound state in the superconducting topological surface state of Fe(Se,Te)

    T. Machida et al., arXiv:1812.08995 [cond-mat.supr-con] (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Wiesendanger, Rev

    R. Wiesendanger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1495-1550 (2009)

    work page 2009

  36. [36]

    5. Ferromagnetism and Exchange

    J.M.D. Coey, “5. Ferromagnetism and Exchange” in Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (Cambridge University Press, New York, 2009), pp. 141-143

    work page 2009

  37. [37]

    Meier et al., Science 320, 82-86 (2008)

    F. Meier et al., Science 320, 82-86 (2008)

    work page 2008

  38. [38]

    Stanescu et al., Phys

    T.D. Stanescu et al., Phys. Rev. B 84, 144522 (2011). 13

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Peng et al., Phys

    Y. Peng et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 106801 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Li et al., Phys

    J. Li et al., Phys. Rev. B 97, 125119 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Wu et al., Science 359, 76-79 (2018)

    S. Wu et al., Science 359, 76-79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [42]

    Fatemi et al., Science 362, 926-929 (2018)

    V. Fatemi et al., Science 362, 926-929 (2018)

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    Huang et al., Nature 546, 270-273 (2017)

    B. Huang et al., Nature 546, 270-273 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Jäck et al., Replication data and theory code for: Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2779382 (2019)

    B. Jäck et al., Replication data and theory code for: Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel, http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2779382 (2019)

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.2779382 2019

  45. [45]

    Y. Liu & R. E. Allen, Phys. Rev. B 52, 1566 (1995)

    work page 1995

  46. [46]

    Dynes et al., Phys

    R.C. Dynes et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 1509 (1978)

    work page 1978

  47. [47]

    Sticlet et al., Phys

    D. Sticlet et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 096802 (2012). Acknowledgments: It is our pleasure to acknowledge initial theoretical support by Annika Johansson. Funding: This work has been primarily supported by Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation as part of EPiQS initiative (GBMF4530), ONR-N00014-17-1-2784, ONR-N00014- 14-1-0330, NSF-MRSEC programs through the ...

    work page 2012