Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 4 cited by

Elastic hadron-nucleus scattering in neutrino-nucleus reactions and transverse kinematics measurements

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Correcting elastic hadron-nucleus scattering in the GENIE generator produces large shifts in transverse kinematic imbalance distributions for quasielastic neutrino events.

desk verdict This is a narrow but practical technical note on a GENIE code bug that distorts transverse kinematic imbalance distributions, with limited validation of the fix itself. read the letter →

arxiv 1906.10576 v1 pith:CKI5JBRZ submitted 2019-06-25 hep-ex hep-phnucl-th

L.A. Harewood , R. Gran This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-exhep-phnucl-th
keywords elastichadron-nucleusscatteringneutrino-nucleusinteractionsfinalstatetransversekinematicimbalancesquasielasticGENIEeventgeneratorFermimotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines the impact of an error in the GENIE neutrino event generator's implementation of three two-body rescattering processes, with special attention to elastic hadron-nucleus scattering. It compares the unfixed version, the fixed version, and the option of disabling elastic scattering entirely across three sets of observables from current neutrino analyses. The central finding is that the unfixed elastic process creates substantial distortions in transverse kinematic imbalance distributions while producing only mild changes in pion angles for Delta reactions and proton-proton angles in pionless events. The corrected process may therefore influence interpretations of nucleon Fermi motion or serve as a benchmark against electron scattering data.

What carries the argument

The elastic hadron-nucleus scattering process within the two-body rescattering model, which primarily changes the direction of the outgoing hadron with very little energy transfer.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of the corrected GENIE predictions against measured transverse kinematic imbalance distributions in quasielastic neutrino data or against (e,e'p) electron scattering measurements on the same nucleus.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Elastic hadron-nucleus scattering in its unfixed form makes a large distortion in distributions of transverse kinematic imbalances for quasielastic neutrino reactions, but only mild distortion in other observables such as the pion angle with respect to the incoming and outgoing lepton for Delta reactions with a charged pion in the final state, and the angle between two protons in reactions with no pions present. The distortion from the other two rescattering processes is also mild for all distributions considered.

Load-bearing premise

That the corrected version of the GENIE code correctly implements the physical elastic hadron-nucleus scattering process rather than the unfixed version or turning it off.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The corrected elastic scattering process could affect both the width and the center of the sharp peak used to infer Fermi motion of the struck nucleon.
  • The corrected process offers a possible benchmark against existing (e,e'p) data sets.
  • Disabling elastic scattering entirely produces results similar to other neutrino event generators or to quick fixes applied to already-generated samples.
  • The other two rescattering processes (hadron-nucleon quasi-elastic and pion absorption) produce only mild changes across the observables examined.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Accurate treatment of final-state elastic scattering may be required to extract reliable nuclear momentum distributions from neutrino data.
  • The size of the effect on transverse variables suggests that similar generator comparisons could be performed for other kinematic observables used in oscillation analyses.
  • If the fixed implementation matches data better, it would indicate that direction-changing rescattering without energy loss is an important ingredient in modeling detectable hadrons.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a technical note identifying an error in the GENIE neutrino event generator's treatment of elastic hadron+nucleus scattering (and related two-body rescattering processes). It presents qualitative comparisons of kinematic distributions (transverse imbalances in quasielastic events, pion-lepton angles in Delta production, and proton-proton angles in pionless events) between the unfixed code, the corrected version, and the case with elastic scattering disabled entirely. The central observation is that the unfixed elastic channel produces large distortions specifically in transverse kinematic imbalance observables while milder effects appear elsewhere.

Significance. If the corrected implementation is physically accurate, the result is significant for neutrino oscillation and interaction analyses that rely on GENIE for final-state interaction modeling, since transverse kinematic variables are used to constrain Fermi motion and separate signal from background. The work usefully flags a code-level issue and its differential impact across observables; however, the absence of any external benchmark reduces the immediate utility for systematic uncertainty estimation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the unfixed elastic scattering 'makes a large distortion' in transverse kinematic imbalance distributions rests on qualitative visual comparisons alone, with no quantitative metrics, error bars, or statistical measures of the difference between versions; this is load-bearing for the claim that the effect is observationally relevant.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the attribution of the difference specifically to the elastic scattering bug presupposes that the fixed GENIE implementation correctly realizes the intended physics (small energy transfer with direction change only), yet the manuscript provides no comparison to external data (e.g., (e,e'p) as mentioned in the abstract) or analytic limits to validate the corrected channel against the unfixed or disabled cases.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The description of the original code error and the precise nature of the fix is not detailed enough to allow independent reproduction or assessment of whether the correction matches the intended physical model.
  2. Consider including tables or supplementary figures with binned ratios or Kolmogorov-Smirnov distances between the three configurations to make the 'large' versus 'mild' distinction quantitative.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review of our technical note. Below we respond to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the unfixed elastic scattering 'makes a large distortion' in transverse kinematic imbalance distributions rests on qualitative visual comparisons alone, with no quantitative metrics, error bars, or statistical measures of the difference between versions; this is load-bearing for the claim that the effect is observationally relevant.

    Authors: The manuscript is a short technical note whose primary goal is to identify a code-level error and demonstrate its impact through direct visual comparison of the affected distributions. The large distortion in the transverse kinematic imbalance is evident from the figures, where the unfixed version shows a markedly different shape compared to both the fixed version and the case with elastic scattering disabled. While we acknowledge the absence of quantitative metrics, adding such measures is not straightforward without arbitrary choices of test statistics, and the qualitative difference suffices to flag the issue for users of the generator. We will add a sentence in the abstract clarifying that the comparison is qualitative. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the attribution of the difference specifically to the elastic scattering bug presupposes that the fixed GENIE implementation correctly realizes the intended physics (small energy transfer with direction change only), yet the manuscript provides no comparison to external data (e.g., (e,e'p) as mentioned in the abstract) or analytic limits to validate the corrected channel against the unfixed or disabled cases.

    Authors: The error in the unfixed code was a clear implementation mistake that led to unphysical behavior in the elastic scattering process, inconsistent with the expected small energy transfer and directional deflection. The fixed version restores the intended physics model. The manuscript does not include external data comparisons or analytic validations because its scope is limited to documenting the code fix and its consequences within GENIE. We mention (e,e'p) data only as a possible future benchmark, not as part of the current work. No revision is needed as this is outside the paper's stated purpose. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: direct code comparisons with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper is a technical note documenting a code bug fix in GENIE for elastic hadron+nucleus scattering and comparing output distributions across unfixed, fixed, and disabled versions. No derivations, predictions, or first-principles results are claimed. All content consists of explicit code modifications and their observable effects on kinematic distributions. No parameters are fitted, no self-citations form load-bearing premises, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The analysis is self-contained against the code versions themselves and does not reduce any claim to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a technical note on a software bug in an event generator. No free parameters are fitted, no new axioms are introduced, and no invented entities are postulated. The work relies on the pre-existing GENIE framework and standard assumptions about nuclear rescattering processes.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elastic hadron-nucleus scattering in neutrino-nucleus reactions and transverse kinematics measurements." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CKI5JBRZ

@misc{pith2026190610576,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elastic hadron-nucleus scattering in neutrino-nucleus reactions and transverse kinematics measurements},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CKI5JBRZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1906.10576}
}
abstract

Rescattering following a neutrino-nucleus reaction changes the number, energy, and direction of detectable hadrons. In turn, this affects the selection and kinematic distributions of subsamples of neutrino events used for interaction or oscillation analysis. This technical note focuses on three forms of two-body rescattering. Elastic hadron+nucleus scattering primarily changes the direction of the hadron with very little energy transfer. Secondly, a hadron+nucleon quasi-elastic process leads to the knockout of a single struck nucleon, possibly with charge exchange between the two hadrons. Also, a pion can be absorbed leading to the ejection of two nucleons. There was an error in the code of the {\small GENIE} neutrino event generator that affects these processes. We present examples of the change with the fixed version of the scattering process, but also compare these specifically to turning off elastic scattering completely, which is similar to other neutrino event generator configurations or a potential Equick-fix to already generated samples. Three examples are taken from current topics of interest: transverse kinematics observables in quasielastic neutrino reactions, the pion angle with respect to the incoming and outgoing lepton for $\Delta$ reactions with a charged pion in the final state, and the angle between two protons in reactions with no pions present. Elastic hadron+nucleus scattering in its unfixed form makes a large distortion in distributions of transverse kinematic imbalances scattering, but only mild distortion in other observables. The distortion of the other two processes is also mild for all distributions considered. The correct form of hadron+nucleus scattering process could play a role in describing the width and center of the sharp peak in the inferred Fermi-motion of the struck nucleon or be benchmarked using (e,e'p) data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.10576 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: These figures are for quasielastic events and elastic fate only: the small energy distortion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix original (left) and fixed (right) transverse kinematics distributions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix original GENIE hA compared to the version with all fixes (thick [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix hA with fix to the elastic only compared to the version with all [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix hA with elastic scatters’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix hA with elastic scatters’ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix hA2015 (elastic becomes other fates) compared to the version [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix coplanarity and inferred neutron momentum for 2p2h reactions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix coplanarity and inferred neutron momentum for ∆ reactions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix pion opening angle with respect to the neutrino. The old elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: GENIEv2.12.10+FSIfix pion angle with respect to the outgoing muon. Original config [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: The generalized inferred nucleon momentum from [16] for events with one pion and one or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Angle between two protons when exactly two protons are above threshold and no pions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Coplanarity angle between the combined proton momentum and the muon. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Elastic proton- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Boosted decision tree reweighting of simulated neutrino interactions for $O(1)$ GeV neutrino cross section measurements

    hep-ex 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A boosted decision tree reweights neutrino Monte Carlo events in high-dimensional detector observables to match a target generator's distributions and efficiency for MINERvA charged-current quasielastic-like measurements.

  2. Comparisons of triple-differential cross sections for quasielastic-like $\nu_\mu$-hydrocarbon interactions using $\langle E_\nu\rangle \sim$ 3~GeV versus $\sim$ 6~GeV beams in MINERvA

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MINERvA compares quasielastic-like cross sections at two neutrino beam energies and finds discrepancies pointing to overestimated final state interactions for protons and pions.

  3. High Statistics Measurements of $\nu_{\mu}$ Charged-Current Single $\pi^{+}$ Production with Zero Pion Kinetic Energy Threshold in MINERvA

    hep-ex 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    High-statistics measurement of νμ CC 1π+ production cross sections on scintillator with zero pion KE threshold shows modern models disagree with data by up to 20% in key regions.

  4. Monte Carlo study of KDAR $\nu_{\mu}$ charged-current scattering on carbon

    hep-ph 2025-08 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    For 235.5 MeV KDAR muon-neutrino charged-current scattering on carbon, NuWro reproduces JSNS² missing-energy data better than GENIE or GiBUU, but all generators miss part of the data.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    and Jerry Miller who coauthored the pion scattering model work in Fig. 16. It is likely a number of theoretical papers on different scattering processes already included an optical potential to describe this effect on the outgoing hadron wavefunction, possibly without special mention of its effects. 33 FIG. 16: Elastic π+−48Ca scattering at 180 MeV. LAMPF da...

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual

    C. Andreopoulos, C. Barry, S. Dytman, H. Gallagher, T. Golan, R. Hatcher, G. Perdue, and J. Yarba, The GENIE Neutrino Monte Carlo Generator: Physics and User Manual, (2015), arXiv:1510.05494 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    R. Gran, E. Jeon, et al. (K2K Collaboration), Measurement of the quasi-elastic axial vector mass in neutrino-oxygen interactions, Phys. Rev. D 74, 052002 (2006), arXiv:hep-ex/0603034

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    A. A. Aguilar-Arevalo et al. (MiniBooNE Collaboration), Measurement of muon neutrino quasi-elastic scattering on carbon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 032301 (2008), arXiv:0706.0926

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    A study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the NOMAD experiment

    V. Lyubushkin et al. (NOMAD Collaboration), A Study of quasi-elastic muon neutrino and antineutrino scattering in the NOMAD experiment, Eur. Phys. J. C 63, 355 (2009), arXiv:0812.4543 . 35

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    E. Oset, L. L. Salcedo, and D. Strottman, A Theoretical Approach to Pion Nuclear Reactions in the Resonance Region, Phys. Lett. B 165, 13 (1985)

    work page 1985

  7. [7]

    The nuance Neutrino Simulation, and the Future

    D. Casper, The Nuance neutrino physics simulation, and the future, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112, 161 (2002), arXiv:hep-ph/0208030

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    Mudan, Ph.D

    M. Mudan, Ph.D. Thesis Results from the IMB nucleon decay detector, Ph.D. thesis, University College London (1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Battistoni, P

    G. Battistoni, P. Lipari, J. Ranft, and E. Scapparone, Simulation of nuclear effects in quasielastic and resonant neutrino interactions, (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9801426 [hep-ph]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Ranft, The Dual parton model at cosmic ray energies, Phys

    J. Ranft, The Dual parton model at cosmic ray energies, Phys. Rev. D 51, 64 (1995)

    1995

  3. [11]

    Roesler, R

    S. Roesler, R. Engel, and J. Ranft, in Advanced Monte Carlo for radiation physics, particle transport simulation and applications. Proceedings, Conference, MC2000, Lisbon, Portugal, October 23-26, 2000 (2000) pp. 1033–1038, arXiv:hep-ph/0012252 [hep-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Walton, M

    T. Walton, M. Betancourt, et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Measurement of muon plus proton final states in νµ interactions on hydrocarbon at <E ν >= 4.2 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 91, 071301 (2015), arXiv:1409.4497

    2015 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Betancourt, A

    M. Betancourt, A. Ghosh, T. Walton, et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Direct Measure- ment of Nuclear Dependence of Charged Current Quasielasticlike Neutrino Interactions Using MINERνA, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 082001 (2017), arXiv:1705.03791

    2017 arXiv

  6. [14]

    X. G. Lu, D. Coplowe, R. Shah, G. Barr, D. Wark, and A. Weber, Reconstruction of Energy Spectra of Neutrino Beams Independent of Nuclear Effects, Phys. Rev. D 92, 051302 (2015), arXiv:1507.00967 [hep-ex]

    2015 arXiv

  7. [15]

    X. G. Lu, L. Pickering, S. Dolan, G. Barr, D. Coplowe, Y. Uchida, D. Wark, M. O. Wascko, A. Weber, and T. Yuan, Measurement of nuclear effects in neutrino interactions with minimal dependence on neutrino energy, Phys. Rev. C 94, 015503 (2016), arXiv:1512.05748 [nucl-th]

    2016 arXiv

  8. [16]

    A. P. Furmanski and J. T. Sobczyk, Neutrino energy reconstruction from one muon and one proton events, Phys. Rev. C 95, 065501 (2017), arXiv:1609.03530 [hep-ex]

    2017 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Lu and J

    X. Lu and J. T. Sobczyk, Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino and antineutrino inter- actions on nuclei using generalized final-state correlations, (2019), arXiv:1901.06411 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  10. [18]

    X. G. Lu, M. Betancourt, T. Walton, et al. (MINERvA), Measurement of final-state correla- tions in neutrino muon-proton mesonless production on hydrocarbon at ⟨Eν⟩ = 3 GeV, Phys. 36 Rev. Lett. 121, 022504 (2018), arXiv:1805.05486

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Abe et al

    K. Abe et al. (T2K), Characterization of nuclear effects in muon-neutrino scattering on hy- drocarbon with a measurement of final-state kinematics and correlations in charged-current pionless interactions at T2K, Phys. Rev. D 98, 032003 (2018), arXiv:1802.05078

    2018 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Dolan, Exploring Nuclear Effects in Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions Using Measurements of Transverse Kinematic Imbalance from T2K and MINERvA, (2018), arXiv:1810.06043 [hep-ex]

    S. Dolan, Exploring Nuclear Effects in Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions Using Measurements of Transverse Kinematic Imbalance from T2K and MINERvA, (2018), arXiv:1810.06043 [hep-ex]

    2018 arXiv

  13. [21]

    The SAID website [http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu] provides access to both fits, models and the associated databases

  14. [22]

    R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Extended partial-wave analysis of piN scattering data, Phys. Rev. C 74, 045205 (2006), arXiv:nucl-th/0605082 [nucl- th]

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    R. A. Arndt, W. J. Briscoe, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman, Updated analysis of NN elastic scattering to 3-GeV, Phys. Rev. C 76, 025209 (2007), arXiv:0706.2195 [nucl-th]

    2007 arXiv

  16. [24]

    S. G. Mashnik, A. J. Sierk, K. K. Gudima, and M. I. Baznat, CEM03 and LAQGSM03: New modeling tools for nuclear applications, Proceedings, 19th Nuclear Physics Divisional Confer- ence of the EPS: New Trends in Nuclear Physics Applications and Technology (NPDC 19): Pavia, Italy,...

    2005 arXiv

  17. [25]

    S. G. Mashnik, R. J. Peterson, A. J. Sierk, and M. R. Braunstein, Pion induced transport of pi mesons in nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 61, 034601 (2000)

    2000

  18. [26]

    S. Dytman, Final state interaction models in neutrino-nucleus cross sections, Proceedings, 6th International Workshop on Neutrino-nucleus interactions in the few GeV region (NUINT 09): Sitges, Spain, May 18-22, 2009 , AIP Conf. Proc. 1189, 51 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    H. Gallagher, The NEUGEN neutrino event generator, Proceedings, 1st International Work- shop on Neutrino-nucleus interactions in the few GeV region (NuInt 01): Tsukuba, Japan, December 13-16, 2001, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 112, 188 (2002), [,188(2002)]

    2001

  20. [28]

    Nieves, J

    J. Nieves, J. E. Amaro, and M. Valverde, Inclusive quasi-elastic neutrino reactions, Phys. Rev. C 70, 055503 (2004), arXiv:nucl-th/0408005

    2004 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Gran, Model uncertainties for Valencia RPA effect for MINERvA, (2017), arXiv:1705.02932

    R. Gran, Model uncertainties for Valencia RPA effect for MINERvA, (2017), arXiv:1705.02932 . 37

    2017 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Nieves, I

    J. Nieves, I. Ruiz Simo, and M. Vicente Vacas, Inclusive Charged–Current Neutrino–Nucleus Reactions, Phys. Rev. C 83, 045501 (2011), arXiv:1102.2777

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    R. Gran, J. Nieves, F. Sanchez, and M. Vicente Vacas, Neutrino-nucleus quasi-elastic and 2p2h interactions up to 10 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 88, 113007 (2013), arXiv:1307.8105

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Schwehr, D

    J. Schwehr, D. Cherdack, and R. Gran, GENIE implementation of IFIC Valencia model for QE-like 2p2h neutrino-nucleus cross section, (2016), arXiv:1601.02038

    2016 arXiv

  25. [33]

    P. A. Rodrigues, J. Demgen, E. Miltenberger, et al. (MINERvA Collaboration), Identification of nuclear effects in neutrino-carbon interactions at low three-momentum transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 071802 (2016), arXiv:1511.05944

    2016

  26. [34]

    Wilkinson et al

    C. Wilkinson et al. , Reanalysis of bubble chamber measurements of muon-neutrino induced single pion production, Phys. Rev. D 90, 112017 (2014), arXiv:1411.4482

    2014 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Rodrigues, C

    P. Rodrigues, C. Wilkinson, and K. McFarland, Constraining the GENIE model of neutrino- induced single pion production using reanalyzed bubble chamber data, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 474 (2016), arXiv:1601.01888

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Acciarri et al

    R. Acciarri et al. (ArgoNeuT Collaboration), Detection of back-to-back proton pairs in charged- current neutrino interactions with the ArgoNeuT detector in the NuMI low energy beam line, Phys. Rev. D 90, 012008 (2014), arXiv:1405.4261

    2014 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Subedi, R

    R. Subedi, R. Shneor, P. Monaghan, B. D. Anderson, K. Aniol, et al. , Probing Cold Dense Nuclear Matter, Science 320, 1476 (2008), arXiv:0908.1514

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    R. D. Mckeown, S. J. Sanders, J. P. Schiffer, H. E. Jackson, M. Paul, J. R. Specht, E. J. Stephenson, R. P. Redwine, and R. E. Segel, How many nucleons are involved in pion ab- sorption in nuclei? Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1033 (1980)

    1980

  31. [39]

    R. D. Mckeown, S. J. Sanders, J. P. Schiffer, H. E. Jackson, M. Paul, J. R. Specht, E. J. Stephenson, R. P. Redwine, and R. E. Segel, Inclusive Reactions of Pions on Nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 24, 211 (1981)

    1981

  32. [40]

    J. T. Sobczyk, Multinucleon ejection model for Meson Exchange Current neutrino interactions, Phys. Rev. C 86, 015504 (2012), arXiv:1201.3673

    2012 arXiv

  33. [41]

    G. S. Adams, T. S. Bauer, G. Igo, G. Pauletta, C. A. Whitten, A. Wriekat, G. W. Hoffmann, G. R. Smith, M. Gazzaly, L. Ray, W. G. Love, and F. Petrovich, Microscopic description of 800-MeV polarized proton scattering from O-16, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 421 (1979)

    1979

  34. [42]

    G. S. Adams, T. S. Bauer, G. Igo, G. Pauletta, C. A. Whitten, A. Wriekat, G. W. Hoffmann, 38 G. R. Smith, and M. Gazzaly, 800-MeV inelastic proton scattering from Ca-40, Ca-48, and Fe-54, Phys. Rev. C 21, 2485 (1980)

    1980

  35. [43]

    K. G. Boyer et al. , Pion Inelastic Scattering to the Low Lying States in 42Ca, 44Ca, 48Ca Determination of the Neutron and Proton Multipole Matrix Elements, Phys. Rev. C 24, 598 (1981)

    1981

  36. [44]

    R. A. Freedman, G. A. Miller, and E. M. Henley, Isobar dynamics and pion nucleus elastic scattering, Nucl. Phys. A 389, 457 (1982)

    1982

  37. [45]

    Vorabbi, P

    M. Vorabbi, P. Finelli, and C. Giusti, Proton-Nucleus Elastic Scattering: Comparison be- tween Phenomenological and Microscopic Optical Potentials, Phys. Rev. C 98, 064602 (2018), arXiv:1806.01037 [nucl-th] . 39

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.