pith. sign in

arxiv: 1906.11491 · v1 · pith:X6MANY3Lnew · submitted 2019-06-27 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Are the observed gaps in protoplanetary discs caused by growing planets?

Nelson Ndugu , Bertram Bitsch , Edward Jurua This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 14:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords protoplanetary discsplanet formationpebble accretiondisc gapspebble isolation masssuper-Earthsgas giantsexoplanet populations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Explaining observed protoplanetary disc gaps with planets requires 2000 Earth masses of pebbles and produces mostly gas giants instead of super-Earths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether planets at the pebble isolation mass can account for the ring-like gaps seen in protoplanetary discs. These planets would create small pressure bumps that trap dust without opening deep gaps. Population synthesis simulations show that matching the observed gap locations demands a total pebble reservoir of 2000 Earth masses. This quantity is available only around the most metal-rich stars. Growing planets from such a large pebble supply yields a final population dominated by gas giants with very few super-Earths, which conflicts with the demographics of known exoplanets.

Core claim

In order to match the gap structures 2000 M_E in pebbles is needed, which would be only available for the most metal rich stars. Planet formation in discs with these large amounts of pebbles result in mostly forming gas giants and only very little super-Earths, contradicting observations. This leads to the conclusions that either (i) the observed discs are exceptions, (ii) not all gaps in observed discs are caused by planets or (iii) that we miss some important ingredients in planet formation related to gas accretion and/or planet migration.

What carries the argument

The pebble isolation mass, the planetary mass at which pebble accretion halts, a small gap opens, and a pressure bump forms exterior to the orbit that traps the largest dust particles.

If this is right

  • Reproducing the gaps requires pebble reservoirs present only around the most metal-rich stars.
  • Formation from such large pebble supplies produces a planet population dominated by gas giants.
  • The resulting scarcity of super-Earths contradicts the observed exoplanet population.
  • The mismatch implies that either the observed discs are atypical, that not every gap is opened by a planet, or that models miss key physics in gas accretion or migration.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If gaps are not produced by planets, alternative mechanisms such as disc instabilities or zonal flows may explain the ring structures.
  • Revised treatments of type-I migration or gas accretion could permit more super-Earths even at high pebble masses.
  • Correlating gap presence with host-star metallicity in large disc surveys would test the metal-rich requirement directly.

Load-bearing premise

That the planetary masses creating the observed small gaps and pressure bumps are exactly the pebble isolation mass and that the total pebble content of the disc can be adjusted as a free parameter to 2000 Earth masses.

What would settle it

A measurement of the actual pebble mass reservoir in a disc that shows the observed gap pattern, or a statistical comparison of the super-Earth to gas-giant ratio in systems whose discs exhibit similar gaps.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1906.11491 by Bertram Bitsch, Edward Jurua, Nelson Ndugu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of the gap occurrence rate found in protoplanetary discs by the DSHARP survey (Huang et al. 2018) and positions of planets in our synthesized population that have just reached pebble isolation mass. The planetary growth and migration is stopped when the planets have reached pebble isolation mass, as they start to generate small pressure bumps in the disc that stops the inflow of pebbles and can … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The top plot feature simulations with nominal pebble flux and lower alpha (for migration and pebble scale height) and the bottom plot fea￾tures results of a simulations with Speb = 10, which gave the best match to the gap observations (Fig.1). The black crosses are the exoplanet popula￾tion observed by the RV method taken from the exoplanet.org database. In all of the plots, the blue crosses are the HR8799… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Planetary frequency determined by the microlensing survey of Cassan et al. (2012) (gray band) and our planet formation simulations. The detection of the planets correspond to the planets covered by the purple rect￾angle in Fig.3 and Fig.4. Our simulations seem to over predict the number of gas giants, but some of them could be removed via scattering (eventually also into the inner disc). However, our simul… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The plot has exactly the same meaning as in Fig.3 but with dots coloured as a function of metallicity. In combination with Fig.3, this shows clearly that a high metallicity is needed to reach the pebble isolation mass in the outer disc within 1-2 My (see also Fig.2). 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 Frequency of giant planets [Z/H] αmig =0.0001, Speb… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent detailed observations of protoplanetary discs revealed a lot of sub-structures which are mostly ring-like. One interpretation is that these rings are caused by growing planets. These potential planets are not yet opening very deep gaps in their discs. These planets instead form small gaps in the discs to generate small pressure bumps exterior to their orbits that stop the inflow of the largest dust particles. In the pebble accretion paradigm, this planetary mass corresponds to the pebble isolation mass, where pebble accretion stops and efficient gas accretion starts. We perform planet population synthesis via pebble and gas accretion including type-I and type-II migration. In the first stage of our simulations, we investigate the conditions necessary for planets to reach the pebble isolation mass and compare their position to the observed gaps. We find that in order to match the gap structures 2000 M E in pebbles is needed, which would be only available for the most metal rich stars. We then follow the evolution of these planets for a few My to compare the resulting population with the observed exoplanet populations. Planet formation in discs with these large amounts of pebbles result in mostly forming gas giants and only very little super-Earths, contradicting observations. This leads to the conclusions that either (i) the observed discs are exceptions, (ii) not all gaps in observed discs are caused by planets or (iii) that we miss some important ingredients in planet formation related to gas accretion and/or planet migration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses planet population synthesis incorporating pebble accretion, gas accretion, and type-I/II migration to test whether observed ring-like gaps in protoplanetary discs can be produced by planets reaching the pebble isolation mass. In the first stage, the authors determine the pebble reservoir needed for planets to reach isolation mass at observed gap locations; they report that 2000 Earth masses of pebbles are required, available only for the most metal-rich stars. In the second stage, evolving these systems for a few Myr yields a population dominated by gas giants with very few super-Earths, in tension with exoplanet demographics. The authors conclude that the observed discs may be atypical, not all gaps are planetary, or important physics (gas accretion or migration) is missing from the model.

Significance. If the central tension holds after addressing the pebble-budget calibration, the work quantifies a potential inconsistency between disc substructure observations and exoplanet occurrence rates under the pebble-accretion paradigm. The explicit inclusion of both migration regimes and the two-stage approach (gap matching followed by long-term evolution) are strengths that allow a direct link between disc features and final demographics.

major comments (2)
  1. [first-stage simulations] First-stage gap-matching simulations: the total pebble mass is adjusted to 2000 M_E specifically so that planets reach pebble isolation mass at the radial locations of observed gaps. Because this value is not derived from an independent observational constraint on disc pebble content, metallicity distribution, or dust-to-gas ratio, the subsequent prediction of a giant-dominated population is a direct consequence of the fitted input rather than an independent test of the model.
  2. [second-stage evolution] Population synthesis results (second stage): the statement that the model forms 'mostly gas giants and only very little super-Earths' is presented qualitatively. Quantitative outputs (e.g., occurrence rate histograms or fractions as a function of pebble budget) are needed to substantiate the claimed contradiction with observed exoplanet populations.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract writes '2000 M E'; consistent notation '2000 M_E' should be used throughout.
  2. Clarify the assumed disc lifetime, stellar mass range, and how the 'few Myr' integration is terminated in the second stage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful report and constructive suggestions. We address the two major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [first-stage simulations] First-stage gap-matching simulations: the total pebble mass is adjusted to 2000 M_E specifically so that planets reach pebble isolation mass at the radial locations of observed gaps. Because this value is not derived from an independent observational constraint on disc pebble content, metallicity distribution, or dust-to-gas ratio, the subsequent prediction of a giant-dominated population is a direct consequence of the fitted input rather than an independent test of the model.

    Authors: We agree that the 2000 M_E value is chosen specifically to enable planets to reach pebble isolation mass at the observed gap radii; it is not taken from an independent disc-mass or metallicity constraint. The manuscript's logic is therefore conditional: if the gaps are produced by planets at isolation mass, then a pebble reservoir of this size is required (available only around the most metal-rich stars), and the subsequent population synthesis then shows the resulting demographic tension. We will revise the text to state this conditional framing explicitly and to remove any suggestion that the demographic result constitutes an independent test of the model. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [second-stage evolution] Population synthesis results (second stage): the statement that the model forms 'mostly gas giants and only very little super-Earths' is presented qualitatively. Quantitative outputs (e.g., occurrence rate histograms or fractions as a function of pebble budget) are needed to substantiate the claimed contradiction with observed exoplanet populations.

    Authors: We accept that the current description is qualitative. In the revised manuscript we will add quantitative diagnostics, including the fraction of planets that become gas giants versus super-Earths (and their occurrence-rate comparison to observations) for the adopted 2000 M_E pebble budget. These will be presented as additional figures or tables showing the final mass distribution after several Myr of evolution. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Pebble reservoir tuned to 2000 M_E to match gaps, then fed into population synthesis yielding demographic mismatch by construction

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "We find that in order to match the gap structures 2000 M E in pebbles is needed, which would be only available for the most metal rich stars. We then follow the evolution of these planets for a few My to compare the resulting population with the observed exoplanet populations. Planet formation in discs with these large amounts of pebbles result in mostly forming gas giants and only very little super-Earths, contradicting observations."

    The pebble mass is varied until the isolation-mass planets appear at the observed gap locations; the same numerical value is inserted into the population-synthesis calculation, rendering the 'mostly gas giants' outcome a direct consequence of the fitted input rather than an independent prediction.

full rationale

The paper adjusts the total pebble reservoir as a free parameter until planets reach pebble isolation mass at observed gap radii. The identical tuned value (2000 M_E) is then used for the full evolutionary runs, so the reported excess of gas giants is a direct numerical outcome of that fit rather than an independent test. This is a single instance of the 'fitted input called prediction' pattern; the central claim therefore contains partial circularity but is not wholly self-referential.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the pebble isolation mass concept from prior work, standard type-I/II migration prescriptions, and the assumption that total pebble mass can be scaled uniformly across discs. The 2000 Earth-mass value is introduced as a fitted requirement rather than derived from first principles.

free parameters (1)
  • total pebble mass
    Set to 2000 Earth masses to reproduce observed gap structures; this value is not independently measured but chosen to match data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Pebble isolation mass marks the transition where pebble accretion stops and efficient gas accretion begins, directly producing the observed small gaps.
    Invoked in the first stage of simulations to link planetary mass to gap formation.
  • domain assumption Type-I and type-II migration prescriptions from prior literature accurately describe planet movement during growth.
    Used throughout the population synthesis without re-derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5790 in / 1515 out tokens · 22421 ms · 2026-05-25T14:28:47.069210+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ALMA Partnership et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/L3 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...808L...3A 808, L3

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/2041-8205/808/1/l3 2015

  2. [3]

    M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L40 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820L..40A 820, L40

    Andrews S. M., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/L40 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...820L..40A 820, L40

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/820/2/l40 2016

  3. [4]

    M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..41A 869, L41

    Andrews S. M., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..41A 869, L41

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  4. [5]

    Bai X.-N., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/96 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...772...96B 772, 96

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/96 2013

  5. [6]

    Bai X.-N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/73 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791...73B 791, 73

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/791/1/73 2014

  6. [7]

    Bai X.-N., Ye J., Goodman J., Yuan F., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/152 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818..152B 818, 152

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/152 2016

  7. [9]

    Baruteau C., et al., 2014, @doi [Protostars and Planets VI] 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch029 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014prpl.conf..667B pp 667--689

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch029 2014

  8. [11]

    Bitsch B., Johansen A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527676 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527676 2016

  9. [12]

    445, Astrophysics and Space Science Library

    Bitsch B., Johansen A., 2017, in Pessah M., Gressel O., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Library Vol. 445, Astrophysics and Space Science Library. p. 339, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5_12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60609-5_12 2017

  10. [14]

    Bitsch B., Johansen A., Lambrechts M., Morbidelli A., 2015a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424964 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424964

  11. [15]

    Bitsch B., Lambrechts M., Johansen A., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526463 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526463

  12. [16]

    Bitsch B., Lambrechts M., Johansen A., 2018a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526463e , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526463e

  13. [17]

    Bitsch B., Morbidelli A., Johansen A., Lega E., Lambrechts M., Crida A., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201731931 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731931

  14. [18]

    N., Izidoro A., 2019a, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190302488B

    Bitsch B., Raymond S. N., Izidoro A., 2019a, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190302488B

    work page

  15. [19]

    N., Morbidelli A., Lambrechts M., Jacobson S

    Bitsch B., Izidoro A., Johansen A., Raymond S. N., Morbidelli A., Lambrechts M., Jacobson S. A., 2019b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834489 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834489

  16. [20]

    Br \"u gger N., Alibert Y., Ataiee S., Benz W., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833347 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833347 2018

  17. [21]

    Cassan A., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10684 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012Natur.481..167C 481, 167

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10684 2012

  18. [22]

    E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/63 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...63C 825, 63

    Chambers J. E., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/63 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...825...63C 825, 63

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/1/63 2016

  19. [23]

    Chambers J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aada09 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...865...30C 865, 30

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aada09 2018

  20. [24]

    I., Goldreich P., 1997, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..368C 490, 368

    Chiang E. I., Goldreich P., 1997, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...490..368C 490, 368

    work page 1997

  21. [25]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482..698C 482, 698

    Cieza L. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2653 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.482..698C 482, 698

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2653 2019

  22. [26]

    Coleman G. A. L., Nelson R. P., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stw1177 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.460.2779C 460, 2779

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1177 2016

  23. [27]

    N., Pierens A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220853 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    Cossou C., Raymond S. N., Pierens A., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220853 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220853 2013

  24. [28]

    Crida A., Morbidelli A., Masset F., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.007 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Icar..181..587C 181, 587

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2005.10.007 2006

  25. [29]

    P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..46D 869, L46

    Dullemond C. P., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..46D 869, L46

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742 2018

  26. [30]

    Fedele D., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629860 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629860 2017

  27. [31]

    P., Dzyurkevich N., Henning T., Klahr H., Wolf S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424693 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    Flock M., Ruge J. P., Dzyurkevich N., Henning T., Klahr H., Wolf S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424693 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424693 2015

  28. [32]

    T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx016 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1984G 467, 1984

    Gonzalez J.-F., Laibe G., Maddison S. T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx016 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.467.1984G 467, 1984

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx016 2017

  29. [33]

    J., Nelson R

    Gressel O., Turner N. J., Nelson R. P., McNally C. P., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/84 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...801...84G 801, 84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/84 2015

  30. [34]

    Hartmann L., Calvet N., Gullbring E., D'Alessio P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305277 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...495..385H 495, 385

    work page doi:10.1086/305277 1998

  31. [35]

    Huang J., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..42H 869, L42

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740 2018

  32. [36]

    Ida S., Lin D. N. C., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/381724 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...604..388I 604, 388

    work page doi:10.1086/381724 2004

  33. [37]

    D., Tanigawa T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad69c , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...864...77I 864, 77

    Ida S., Tanaka H., Johansen A., Kanagawa K. D., Tanigawa T., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad69c , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...864...77I 864, 77

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad69c 2018

  34. [38]

    Isella A., et al., 2016, @doi [Physical Review Letters] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.251101 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016PhRvL.117y1101I 117, 251101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.251101 2016

  35. [39]

    N., Morbidelli A., Pierens A., Bitsch B., Cossou C., Hersant F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1232 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.1750I 470, 1750

    Izidoro A., Ogihara M., Raymond S. N., Morbidelli A., Pierens A., Bitsch B., Cossou C., Hersant F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx1232 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.1750I 470, 1750

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1232 2017

  36. [40]

    N., Johansen A., Morbidelli A., Lambrechts M., Jacobson S

    Izidoro A., Bitsch B., Raymond S. N., Johansen A., Morbidelli A., Lambrechts M., Jacobson S. A., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190208772I

    work page 2019

  37. [41]

    Johansen A., Lacerda P., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16309.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.404..475J 404, 475

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16309.x 2010

  38. [43]

    Johansen A., Mac Low M.-M., Lacerda P., Bizzarro M., 2015b, @doi [Science Advances] 10.1126/sciadv.1500109 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015SciA....115109J 1, 1500109

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1500109

  39. [44]

    Johansen A., Ida S., Brasser R., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834071 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834071 2019

  40. [45]

    A., Aller K

    Johnson J. A., Aller K. M., Howard A. W., Crepp J. R., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1086/655775 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010PASP..122..905J 122, 905

    work page doi:10.1086/655775 2010

  41. [46]

    Juri \'c M., Tremaine S., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/590047 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...686..603J 686, 603

    work page doi:10.1086/590047 2008

  42. [50]

    A., Johansen A., Bitsch B., Izidoro A., Raymond S

    Lambrechts M., Morbidelli A., Jacobson S. A., Johansen A., Bitsch B., Izidoro A., Raymond S. N., 2019, arXiv e-prints, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190208694L

    work page 2019

  43. [51]

    F., Thommes E., Duncan M

    Levison H. F., Thommes E., Duncan M. J., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-6256 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010AJ....139.1297L 139, 1297

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256 2010

  44. [52]

    F., Kretke K

    Levison H. F., Kretke K. A., Duncan M. J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature14675 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.524..322L 524, 322

    work page doi:10.1038/nature14675 2015

  45. [53]

    W., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732307 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Liu B., Ormel C. W., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732307 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732307 2018

  46. [54]

    Long F., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869...17L 869, 17

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1 2018

  47. [55]

    R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv206 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457L..54L 457, L54

    Lor \'e n-Aguilar P., Bate M. R., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slv206 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.457L..54L 457, L54

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slv206 2016

  48. [56]

    J., Reeves J

    Machida M. N., Kokubo E., Inutsuka S.-I., Matsumoto T., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16527.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010MNRAS.405.1227M 405, 1227

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16527.x 2010

  49. [57]

    Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Lifetimes of Primordial Disks

    Mamajek E. E., 2009, in Usuda T., Tamura M., Ishii M., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 1158, American Institute of Physics Conference Series. pp 3--10 ( @eprint arXiv 0906.5011 ), @doi 10.1063/1.3215910

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1063/1.3215910 2009

  50. [58]

    Mayor M., et al., 2011, preprint, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011arXiv1109.2497M ( @eprint arXiv 1109.2497 )

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  51. [59]

    M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.3448M 483, 3448

    Monsch K., Ercolano B., Picogna G., Preibisch T., Rau M. M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty3346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.483.3448M 483, 3448

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3346 2019

  52. [60]

    Morbidelli A., Nesvorny D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219824 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219824 2012

  53. [61]

    Morbidelli A., Lambrechts M., Jacobson S., Bitsch B., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2015.06.003 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Icar..258..418M 258, 418

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2015.06.003 2015

  54. [63]

    Movshovitz N., Podolak M., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.icarus.2007.09.018 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008Icar..194..368M 194, 368

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.09.018 2008

  55. [64]

    D., Pascucci I., Apai D., Ciesla F

    Mulders G. D., Pascucci I., Apai D., Ciesla F. J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aac5ea , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156...24M 156, 24

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aac5ea 2018

  56. [65]

    Nayakshin S., Dipierro G., Szulagyi J., 2019, arXiv e-prints, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019arXiv190513104N

    work page 2019

  57. [66]

    Ndugu N., Bitsch B., Jurua E., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx2815 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.474..886N 474, 886

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2815 2018

  58. [67]

    Okuzumi S., Momose M., Sirono S.-i., Kobayashi H., Tanaka H., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/82 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...821...82O 821, 82

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/82 2016

  59. [68]

    W., Klahr H

    Ormel C. W., Klahr H. H., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014903 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014903 2010

  60. [69]

    W., Liu B., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732562 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Ormel C. W., Liu B., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732562 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732562 2018

  61. [70]

    Paardekooper S.-J., Mellema G., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054449 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054449 2006

  62. [71]

    Paardekooper S.-J., Baruteau C., Kley W., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17442.x , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.410..293P 410, 293

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17442.x 2011

  63. [72]

    P., Uribe A

    Pinilla P., Birnstiel T., Ricci L., Dullemond C. P., Uribe A. L., Testi L., Natta A., 2012a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118204 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118204

  64. [73]

    Pinilla P., Benisty M., Birnstiel T., 2012b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201219315 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219315

  65. [74]

    Pinilla P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526655 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526655 2015

  66. [75]

    A., Youdin A

    Piso A.-M. A., Youdin A. N., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...786...21P 786, 21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x 2014

  67. [76]

    Semenov D., Henning T., Helling C., Ilgner M., Sedlmayr E., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20031279 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031279 2003

  68. [77]

    Sotiriadis S., Libert A.-S., Bitsch B., Crida A., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A\

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361 2017

  69. [78]

    K., Ogihara M., Morbidelli A., Crida A., Guillot T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628955 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    Suzuki T. K., Ogihara M., Morbidelli A., Crida A., Guillot T., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628955 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628955 2016

  70. [79]

    Suzuki D., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf577 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...869L..34S 869, L34

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf577 2018

  71. [80]

    Z., Inutsuka S.-i., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/184 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..184T 152, 184

    Takahashi S. Z., Inutsuka S.-i., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/184 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016AJ....152..184T 152, 184

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-6256/152/6/184 2016

  72. [81]

    Tanaka H., Ida S., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1006/icar.1999.6107 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Icar..139..350T 139, 350

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1999.6107 1999

  73. [82]

    Turner N. J., Fromang S., Gammie C., Klahr H., Lesur G., Wardle M., Bai X.-N., 2014, @doi [Protostars and Planets VI] 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch018 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014prpl.conf..411T pp 411--432

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch018 2014

  74. [83]

    Walsh C., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/791/1/L6 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...791L...6W 791, L6

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/791/1/l6 2014

  75. [84]

    J., 2006, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Icar..181..572W 181, 572

    Weidenschilling S. J., 2006, , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006Icar..181..572W 181, 572

    work page 2006

  76. [85]

    L., 1972, in Elvius A., ed., From Plasma to Planet

    Whipple F. L., 1972, in Elvius A., ed., From Plasma to Planet. p. 211

    work page 1972

  77. [86]

    A., Bergin E

    Zhang K., Blake G. A., Bergin E. A., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806L...7Z 806, L7

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/l7 2015

  78. [87]

    van der Marel N., Pinilla P., Tobin J., van Kempen T., Andrews S., Ricci L., Birnstiel T., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/810/1/L7 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...810L...7V 810, L7

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/810/1/l7 2015

  79. [88]

    P., Tobin J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd31 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..112V 872, 112

    van der Marel N., Dong R., di Francesco J., Williams J. P., Tobin J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aafd31 , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872..112V 872, 112

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafd31 2019

  80. [89]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

    work page