Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 1 cited by

Applying Liouville's Theorem to Gaia Data

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-05-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Liouville's theorem connects Gaia stellar kinematics to the original masses of tidally disrupted clusters via phase-space density conservation.

desk verdict The paper shows a workable entropy-minimization trick to recover conserved phase-space density from Gaia streams and demonstrates it on M4, but the uniqueness of the minimum and the handling of error-induced entropy remain unproven in the available text. read the letter →

arxiv 1907.00987 v1 pith:EYWZKMJ2 submitted 2019-07-01 astro-ph.GA

Matthew R. Buckley , David W. Hogg , Adrian M. Price-Whelan This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords phase-spacedensityLiouvilletheoremtidalstreamsGaiaobservationsglobularclustersstellarkinematicsentropyminimizationMilkyWay
checked against Cost.FunctionalEquationbranch_selection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that phase-space density remains conserved according to Liouville's theorem even after tidal disruption. Measurement errors and orbital integration add entropy, which lowers apparent density, but this can be corrected by finding the orbital parameters that minimize the entropy of the stellar stream. Applying this to cold streams from disrupted systems allows inference of the true underlying density and thus the initial mass and structure of the parent cluster or dwarf galaxy. A test on the intact globular cluster M4 shows the method recovers its known mass. This opens a route to properties of non-equilibrium systems that cannot be measured directly.

What carries the argument

Minimization of phase-space entropy to recover true orbital parameters despite entropy injection from uncertainties, applied to stellar streams in phase space.

What would settle it

A simulation of a disrupted cluster with known initial mass where the entropy-minimized density does not match the true conserved value would show the method fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Minimizing the phase-space entropy of cold stellar streams recovers the orbital parameters and true phase-space density, enabling reconstruction of the original properties of tidally disrupted star clusters from Gaia observations.

Load-bearing premise

Minimizing phase-space entropy correctly identifies the true orbital parameters and recovers the underlying phase-space density.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The initial masses of globular clusters can be derived from their tidal debris.
  • Density profiles of disrupted dwarf galaxies become measurable.
  • Phase-space density provides a conserved quantity linking current observations to past states.
  • Non-equilibrium tidal remnants can be analyzed for their original characteristics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Applying the method to multiple streams could help map the gravitational potential of the Milky Way.
  • Extensions to larger Gaia datasets might allow statistical studies of cluster disruption rates.
  • Simulations of known streams could test the accuracy of the entropy minimization approach.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that Liouville's theorem connects Gaia stellar kinematics to the conserved phase-space density (and thus original mass) of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies. It reports a measurement of the phase-space density of M4 and asserts that, for tidally disrupted systems, orbital parameters and the underlying density can be recovered by minimizing the measured phase-space entropy of cold stellar streams, providing a proof-of-principle for reconstructing initial cluster properties.

Significance. If validated with quantitative results, the approach would enable mass and density-profile estimates for non-equilibrium tidal debris, with direct relevance to Milky Way assembly history and dark-matter constraints. The use of entropy minimization to invert error-induced entropy injection is a potentially powerful inference step if the minimum is shown to be unique and to recover the ground-truth density.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that entropy minimization recovers the true orbital parameters and phase-space density is presented without any quantitative results, error budgets, or validation against simulated streams with known ground truth; the text only describes the method and states that the issues 'can be overcome.'
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on complications from uncertainties): the assertion that measurement errors and orbital integration 'effectively inject entropy' but that minimization compensates for it is load-bearing for the disrupted-system claim, yet no demonstration is given that the entropy surface S(orbit) has a unique global minimum at the true orbit or that the injection is invertible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report and constructive suggestions. The manuscript is framed as a proof-of-principle demonstration using real Gaia data for M4 and streams. We agree that the abstract would benefit from explicit quantitative results and that the entropy-minimization claim requires clearer validation of uniqueness and invertibility. We have prepared revisions to address both points.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that entropy minimization recovers the true orbital parameters and phase-space density is presented without any quantitative results, error budgets, or validation against simulated streams with known ground truth; the text only describes the method and states that the issues 'can be overcome.'

    Authors: We agree the abstract is too high-level. The body reports a specific phase-space density measurement for M4 together with the derived mass via Liouville's theorem, and applies entropy minimization to real disrupted streams. However, the current version lacks simulated ground-truth tests. In revision we will (i) insert numerical values and error bars from the M4 analysis into the abstract and (ii) add a short validation subsection using mock streams with known initial conditions to show parameter recovery. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on complications from uncertainties): the assertion that measurement errors and orbital integration 'effectively inject entropy' but that minimization compensates for it is load-bearing for the disrupted-system claim, yet no demonstration is given that the entropy surface S(orbit) has a unique global minimum at the true orbit or that the injection is invertible.

    Authors: The manuscript relies on the physical expectation that the true orbit minimizes entropy, but does not explicitly demonstrate uniqueness of the global minimum or invertibility. This is a valid observation. We will revise by adding a figure or test that maps S(orbit) for a controlled case and shows the minimum coincides with the input truth, together with a brief discussion of the conditions under which the mapping remains invertible within measurement uncertainties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; entropy minimization is an independent inference step

full rationale

The paper measures phase-space density directly for M4 using Gaia data and applies Liouville's theorem to obtain mass. For disrupted streams it proposes minimizing measured phase-space entropy over trial orbits as a recovery method. This minimization is presented as an external optimization procedure whose success depends on the shape of the entropy surface, not on any equation that defines the target density in terms of the minimized quantity or vice versa. No self-citation chain, fitted-input renaming, or ansatz smuggling appears in the provided derivation; the central claim therefore does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard conservation laws in stellar dynamics and assumptions about observational entropy that are not independently verified in the provided abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Phase-space density is conserved during adiabatic phase mixing (Liouville's theorem)
    Stated as providing the connection between current kinematics and original mass.
  • domain assumption Measurement errors and orbital integration inject entropy that preferentially decreases measured density and can be overcome
    Identified as the key complications that the method addresses.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Applying Liouville's Theorem to Gaia Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EYWZKMJ2

@misc{pith2026190700987,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Applying Liouville's Theorem to Gaia Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EYWZKMJ2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1907.00987}
}
read the original abstract

The Milky Way is filled with the tidally-disrupted remnants of globular clusters and dwarf galaxies. Determining the properties of these objects -- in particular, initial masses and density profiles -- is relevant to both astronomy and dark matter physics. However, most direct measures of mass cannot be applied to tidal debris, as the systems of interest are no longer in equilibrium. Since phase-space density is conserved during adiabatic phase mixing, Liouville's theorem provides a connection between stellar kinematics as measured by observatories such as Gaia and the original mass of the disrupted system. Accurately recovering the phase-space density is complicated by uncertainties resulting from measurement errors and orbital integration, which both effectively inject entropy into the system, preferentially decreasing the measured density. In this paper, we demonstrate that these two issues can be overcome. First, we measure the phase-space density of the globular cluster M4 in Gaia data, and use Liouville's theorem to derive its mass. We then show that, for tidally disrupted systems, the orbital parameters and thus phase-space density can be inferred by minimizing the phase-space entropy of cold stellar streams. This work is therefore a proof of principle that true phase-space density can be measured and the original properties of the star cluster reconstructed in systems of astrophysical interest.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.00987 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Left: Heatmap of the six-dimensional probability density as a function of radial distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Proper motions of all stars in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Measurement errors reported by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Scatter plot of the radial position and speed relative to the average motion of the 20,000 simulated M4 stars, without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Histograms of the phase-space density of the stars. Left: simulated stars drawn from a King profile with the parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Scatter plot of the radial position and speed relative to the average motion of the M4 stars in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Measured phase-space volume (divided by the initial volume) of 1000 stars evolving in an isochrone potential with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Left: Evolution in position-space of a globular cluster being tidally-stripped in a Milky Way potential, starting as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Left: Histogram of the entropy of the phase-space density of 1000 stars calculated using action-angles derived from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Log-likelihood [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gravitational Potential from small-scale clustering in action space: Application to Gaia DR2

    astro-ph.GA 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Maximizing small-scale clustering in action space recovers the Milky Way dark matter halo parameters (f_h, alpha) = (0.391, 1.835) and (0.351, 1.687) in two radial bins from Gaia DR2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Astrophys. J. 142, 1317 (1965)

    work page 1965

  2. [2]

    W. H. Press and P. Schechter, Astrophys. J. 187, 425 (1974)

    work page 1974

  3. [3]

    S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 177, 717 (1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    Searle and R

    L. Searle and R. Zinn, Astrophys. J. 225, 357 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, J. R. Primack, and M. J. Rees, Nature 311, 517 (1984)

    work page 1984

  6. [6]

    R. A. Ibata, G. Gilmore, and M. J. Irwin, Nature 370, 194 (1994)

    work page 1994

  7. [7]

    Dark Matter Debris Flows in the Milky Way

    M. Lisanti and D. N. Spergel, Phys. Dark Univ. 1, 155 (2012), 1105.4166

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  8. [9]

    K. V. Johnston, Astrophys. J. 495, 297 (1998), astro-ph/9710007

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

Show all 67 references
  1. [10]

    K. V. Johnston, A. A. Sheffield, S. R. Majewski, and S. Sharma, Astrophys. J. 760, 95 (2012), 1202.5311

    2012 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Malhan, R

    K. Malhan, R. A. Ibata, and N. F. Martin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481, 3442 (2018), 1804.11339

    2018 arXiv

  3. [12]

    A. M. Price-Whelan and A. Bonaca, Astrophys. J. 863, L20 (2018), 1805.00425

    2018 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Helmi and S

    A. Helmi and S. D. M. White, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 307, 495 (1999), astro-ph/9901102

    1999 arXiv

  5. [14]

    G. C. Myeong, N. W. Evans, V. Belokurov, N. C. Amorisco, and S. E. Koposov, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 475, 1537 (2018), 1712.04071

    2018 arXiv

  6. [15]

    D. G. York, J. Adelman, J. Anderson, John E., S. F. Anderson, J. Annis, N. A. Bahcall, J. A. Bakken, R. Barkhouser, S. Bastian, E. Berman, et al., Astron. J. 120, 1579 (2000), astro-ph/0006396

    2000 arXiv

  7. [16]

    D. J. Eisenstein, D. H. Weinberg, E. Agol, H. Aihara, C. Allende Prieto, S. F. Anderson, J. A. Arns, ´E. Aubourg, S. Bailey, E. Balbinot, et al., Astron. J. 142, 72 (2011), 1101.1529

    2011 arXiv

  8. [17]

    M. R. Blanton, M. A. Bershady, B. Abolfathi, F. D. Albareti, C. Allende Prieto, A. Almeida, J. Alonso-Garc´ ıa, F. Anders, S. F. Anderson, B. Andrews, et al., Astron. J. 154, 28 (2017), 1703.00052

    2017 arXiv

  9. [18]

    Yanny, C

    B. Yanny, C. Rockosi, H. J. Newberg, G. R. Knapp, J. K. Adelman-McCarthy, B. Alcorn, S. Allam, C. Allende Prieto, D. An, K. S. J. Anderson, et al., Astron. J. 137, 4377 (2009), 0902.1781

    2009 arXiv

  10. [19]

    S. R. Majewski, R. P. Schiavon, P. M. Frinchaboy, C. Allende Prieto, R. Barkhouser, D. Bizyaev, B. Blank, S. Brunner, A. Burton, R. Carrera, et al., Astron. J. 154, 94 (2017), 1509.05420

    2017 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Abbott, F

    Dark Energy Survey Collaboration, T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, J. Aleksi´ c, S. Allam, A. Amara, D. Bacon, E. Balbinot, M. Banerji, K. Bechtol, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 1270 (2016), 1601.00329

    2016 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Gaia Collaboration, A. G. A. Brown, A. Vallenari, T. Prusti, J. H. J. de Bruijne, C. Babusiaux, C. A. L. Bailer-Jones, M. Biermann, D. W. Evans, L. Eyer, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 616, A1 (2018), 1804.09365

    2018 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Belokurov, D

    V. Belokurov, D. B. Zucker, N. W. Evans, G. Gilmore, S. Vidrih, D. M. Bramich, H. J. Newberg, R. F. G. Wyse, M. J. Irwin, M. Fellhauer, et al., Astrophys. J. 642, L137 (2006), astro-ph/0605025

    2006 arXiv

  14. [23]

    420 (2016)

    Tidal Streams in the Local Group and Beyond , vol. 420 (2016)

    2016

  15. [24]

    Belokurov, D

    V. Belokurov, D. Erkal, N. W. Evans, S. E. Koposov, and A. J. Deason, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 478, 611 (2018), 1802.03414. 18

    2018 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Helmi, C

    A. Helmi, C. Babusiaux, H. H. Koppelman, D. Massari, J. Veljanoski, and A. G. A. Brown, Nature 563, 85 (2018), 1806.06038

    2018 arXiv

  17. [26]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T. Quinn, J. Stadel, and P. Tozzi, Astrophys. J. 524, L19 (1999), astro- ph/9907411

    1999

  18. [27]

    J. R. Hargis, B. Willman, and A. H. G. Peter, Astrophys. J. 795, L13 (2014), 1407.4470

    2014 arXiv

  19. [28]

    S. Y. Kim, A. H. G. Peter, and J. R. Hargis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 211302 (2018)

    2018

  20. [29]

    V. H. Robles, T. Kelley, J. S. Bullock, and M. Kaplinghat, arXiv e-prints arXiv:1903.01469 (2019), 1903.01469

    1903

  21. [30]

    M. R. Buckley and A. H. G. Peter, Phys. Rept. 761, 1 (2018), 1712.06615

    2018 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Boylan-Kolchin and C.-P

    M. Boylan-Kolchin and C.-P. Ma, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 349, 1117 (2004), astro-ph/0309243

    2004 arXiv

  23. [32]

    Diaferio and M

    A. Diaferio and M. J. Geller, Astrophys. J. 481, 633 (1997), astro-ph/9701034

    1997 arXiv

  24. [33]

    Diaferio, Mon

    A. Diaferio, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 309, 610 (1999), astro-ph/9906331

    1999 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Alpaslan, A

    M. Alpaslan, A. S. G. Robotham, S. Driver, P. Norberg, J. A. Peacock, I. Baldry, J. Bland -Hawthorn, S. Brough, A. M. Hopkins, L. S. Kelvin, et al., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 2832 (2012), 1204.0510

    2012 arXiv

  26. [35]

    K. V. Johnston, H. Zhao, D. N. Spergel, and L. Hernquist, Astrophys. J. 512, L109 (1999), astro-ph/9807243

    1999 arXiv

  27. [36]

    G. R. Blumenthal, S. M. Faber, R. Flores, and J. R. Primack, Astrophys. J. 301, 27 (1986)

    1986

  28. [37]

    Pe˜ narrubia, A

    J. Pe˜ narrubia, A. J. Benson, D. Mart´ ınez-Delgado, and H. W. Rix, Astrophys. J.645, 240 (2006), astro-ph/0512507

    2006 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Conroy, A

    C. Conroy, A. Loeb, and D. Spergel, Astrophys. J. 741, 72 (2011), 1010.5783

    2011 arXiv

  30. [39]

    J. R. Neeley, M. Marengo, G. Bono, V. F. Braga, M. Dall’Ora, P. B. Stetson, R. Buonanno, I. Ferraro, W. L. Freedman, G. Iannicola, et al., Astrophys. J. 808, 11 (2015), 1505.07858

    2015 arXiv

  31. [40]

    D. E. McLaughlin and R. P. van der Marel, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 161, 304 (2005), astro-ph/0605132

    2005 arXiv

  32. [41]

    B. Holl, L. Lindegren, and D. Hobbs, Astron. Astrophys. 543, A15 (2012)

    2012

  33. [42]

    Sharma and M

    S. Sharma and M. Steinmetz, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 373, 1293 (2006), astro-ph/0507550

    2006 arXiv

  34. [43]

    de Bruijne, M

    J. de Bruijne, M. Perryman, L. Lindegren, et al. (2005), gAIA-JDB-022, URL http://www.rssd.esa.int/doc_fetch.php? id=448635

    2005

  35. [44]

    Tremaine, Mon

    S. Tremaine, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 307, 877 (1999), astro-ph/9812146

    1999 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Helmi, Astron

    A. Helmi, Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 15, 145 (2008), 0804.0019

    2008 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Pe˜ narrubia, S

    J. Pe˜ narrubia, S. E. Koposov, and M. G. Walker, Astrophys. J. 760, 2 (2012), 1209.2126

    2012 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Binney, Mon

    J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 386, L47 (2008), 0802.1485

    2008 arXiv

  39. [48]

    R. E. Sanderson, A. Helmi, and D. W. Hogg, IAU Symp. 298, 207 (2014), [Astrophys. J.801,98(2015)], 1404.6534

    2014 arXiv

  40. [49]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, D. W. Hogg, K. V. Johnston, and D. Hendel, Astrophys. J. 794, 4 (2014), 1405.6721

    2014 arXiv

  41. [50]

    H. Lux, J. I. Read, G. Lake, and K. V. Johnston, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 436, 2386 (2013), 1308.2235

    2013 arXiv

  42. [51]

    A. M. Price-Whelan and K. V. Johnston, Astrophys. J. 778, L12 (2013), 1308.2670

    2013 arXiv

  43. [52]

    Magorrian, Mon

    J. Magorrian, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 437, 2230 (2014), 1303.6099

    2014 arXiv

  44. [53]

    H. J. T. Buist and A. Helmi, Astron. Astrophys. 601, A37 (2017), 1512.05138

    2017 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine, Galactic dynamics (1987)

    1987

  46. [55]

    V. I. Arnold, Mathematical methods of classical mechanics (1978)

    1978

  47. [56]

    Bovy, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 216, 29 (2015), 1412.3451

    J. Bovy, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 216, 29 (2015), 1412.3451

    2015 arXiv

  48. [57]

    Binney, Mon

    J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 1324 (2012), 1207.4910

    2012 arXiv

  49. [58]

    Sanders, Mon

    J. Sanders, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 128 (2012), 1208.2813

    2012 arXiv

  50. [59]

    J. L. Sanders and J. Binney, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 441, 3284 (2014), 1401.3600

    2014 arXiv

  51. [60]

    P. J. McMillan, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 465, 76 (2017), 1608.00971

    2017 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Hattori, D

    K. Hattori, D. Erkal, and J. L. Sanders, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 460, 497 (2016), 1512.04536

    2016 arXiv

  53. [62]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, B. Sesar, K. V. Johnston, and H.-W. Rix, Astrophys. J. 824, 104 (2016), 1601.06790

    2016 arXiv

  54. [63]

    Pearson, A

    S. Pearson, A. M. Price-Whelan, and K. V. Johnston, Nature Astronomy 1, 633 (2017), 1703.04627

    2017 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Oliphant, NumPy: A guide to NumPy , USA: Trelgol Publishing (2006–), [Online; accessed ¡today¿], URL http: //www.numpy.org/

    T. Oliphant, NumPy: A guide to NumPy , USA: Trelgol Publishing (2006–), [Online; accessed ¡today¿], URL http: //www.numpy.org/

    2006

  56. [65]

    Jones, T

    E. Jones, T. Oliphant, P. Peterson, et al., SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python (2001–), [Online; accessed ¡today¿], URL http://www.scipy.org/

    2001

  57. [66]

    Astropy Collaboration, T. P. Robitaille, E. J. Tollerud, P. Greenfield, M. Droettboom, E. Bray, T. Aldcroft, M. Davis, A. Ginsburg, A. M. Price-Whelan, et al., Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013), 1307.6212

    2013 arXiv

  58. [67]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, B. M. Sip˝ ocz, H. M. G¨ unther, P. L. Lim, S. M. Crawford, S. Conseil, D. L. Shupe, M. W. Craig, N. Dencheva, A. Ginsburg, et al., Astron. J. 156, 123 (2018)

    2018

  59. [68]

    A. M. Price-Whelan, The Journal of Open Source Software 2 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed May 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.