pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02471 · v1 · pith:PQZOUSKOnew · submitted 2019-07-04 · 🧮 math-ph · math.FA· math.MP· quant-ph

Generalized Anti-Wick Quantum States

Maurice de Gosson This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 08:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph math.FAmath.MPquant-ph
keywords quite Toeplitz density operatorsanti-Wick operatorsmixed quantum statesphase space translationsdensity operatorsFeichtinger spaces
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quite Toeplitz density operators describe mixed quantum states obtained by translating a fixed window function in phase space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces quite Toeplitz density operators as those that arise when a single fixed function, termed the window, undergoes translations in both position and momentum. These operators form a class of mixed states in quantum mechanics and coincide with the anti-Wick operators of Berezin in the basic case. A sympathetic reader would see value in a concrete recipe for building families of density operators from one chosen window. The treatment of these operators is stated to demand function spaces introduced by Feichtinger.

Core claim

Quite Toeplitz density operators correspond to states obtained from a fixed function (window) by position-momentum translations, and reduce in the simplest case to the anti-Wick operators considered long ago by Berezin. The rigorous study of these operators requires the use of classes of functional spaces defined by Feichtinger.

What carries the argument

Quite Toeplitz density operators, which encode mixed states generated by position-momentum translations of one window function.

Load-bearing premise

The rigorous study of these operators requires the use of classes of functional spaces defined by Feichtinger.

What would settle it

An explicit density operator constructed by phase-space translation of a window function that fails to satisfy the quite Toeplitz definition would disprove the claimed correspondence.

read the original abstract

The purpose of this Note is to study a simple class of mixed states and the corresponding density operators (matrices). These operators, which we call quite Toeplitz density operators correspond to states obtained from a fixed function ("window") by position-momentum translations, and reduce in the simplest case to the anti-Wick operators considered long ago by Berezin. The rigorous study of Toeplitz operators requires the use of classes of functional spaces defined by Feichtinger.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces 'quite Toeplitz density operators' as a class of mixed states and corresponding density operators obtained from a fixed window function via position-momentum translations; these reduce to Berezin's anti-Wick operators in the simplest case. It states that rigorous study of such operators requires Feichtinger's classes of functional spaces.

Significance. The note defines a terminology linking certain quantum density operators to time-frequency analysis via translations of a window function and references prior work by Berezin and Feichtinger. However, because the manuscript contains no explicit constructions, examples, theorems, or verifications, its significance is limited to a brief announcement even if the definitional correspondence holds by construction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (entire manuscript content): the central claim that the operators 'correspond to states obtained from a fixed function (window) by position-momentum translations' and 'reduce in the simplest case to the anti-Wick operators' is asserted without any definition of the window, the translation operators, the resulting density operator, or verification of positivity and trace-class properties. This is load-bearing for the introduction of the class.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (entire manuscript content): no equations, explicit constructions, or proofs are supplied to support the claim that rigorous study requires Feichtinger spaces or to demonstrate any properties of the proposed operators.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title emphasizes 'Quantum States' while the text focuses exclusively on density operators; a sentence clarifying the relationship between the states and the operators would aid clarity.
  2. The term 'quite Toeplitz' is introduced without any discussion of its relation to classical Toeplitz operators or the motivation for the qualifier 'quite'.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their report. We respond to the major comments as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (entire manuscript content): the central claim that the operators 'correspond to states obtained from a fixed function (window) by position-momentum translations' and 'reduce in the simplest case to the anti-Wick operators' is asserted without any definition of the window, the translation operators, the resulting density operator, or verification of positivity and trace-class properties. This is load-bearing for the introduction of the class.

    Authors: The note introduces the class by definition: the quite Toeplitz density operators are those obtained by position-momentum translations of a fixed window function. This is the standard construction in the field, reducing to anti-Wick when the window is Gaussian as in Berezin's work. Explicit definitions of the operators and verification of properties such as positivity are part of the standard theory in time-frequency analysis and are assumed known; the note's contribution is the application to mixed quantum states and the terminology. revision: no

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (entire manuscript content): no equations, explicit constructions, or proofs are supplied to support the claim that rigorous study requires Feichtinger spaces or to demonstrate any properties of the proposed operators.

    Authors: The requirement for Feichtinger spaces is stated as it is the established framework for the rigorous analysis of such translation-based operators, per Feichtinger's work. As this is a short note rather than a comprehensive paper, we do not include the equations or proofs, which can be found in the referenced literature on Feichtinger spaces and their use in operator theory. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper defines quite Toeplitz density operators directly as those obtained from position-momentum translations of a fixed window function, with the reduction to Berezin anti-Wick operators stated as the simplest case of this definition. This is an explicit construction, not a derived theorem or prediction that reduces to its own inputs. The reference to Feichtinger's functional spaces is an external citation to the standard setting for the rigorous treatment, with no self-citation chain or load-bearing uniqueness theorem invoked. The derivation chain is self-contained as a definitional framework without any fitted parameters renamed as predictions or ansatzes smuggled via prior self-work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on the prior existence of anti-Wick operators (Berezin) and Feichtinger spaces; no new free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are visible in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Feichtinger's functional spaces provide the appropriate framework for the rigorous study of these operators.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as required for rigorous treatment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5590 in / 1047 out tokens · 29892 ms · 2026-05-25T08:56:28.919875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bastiaans, Wigner distribution function and its ap plication to first-order optics, J

    M.J. Bastiaans, Wigner distribution function and its ap plication to first-order optics, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69, 1710–1716 (1979)

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    Berezin, Wick and anti-Wick operator symbols, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik , 15(4), 577 (1971); Mat

    F.A. Berezin, Wick and anti-Wick operator symbols, Mathematics of the USSR-Sbornik , 15(4), 577 (1971); Mat. Sb. (N.S.) 86(128) (1971), 578–610 (Russian) 10

    work page 1971

  3. [3]

    Berezin and M

    F.A. Berezin and M. Shubin, The Schr¨ odinger Equation Springer Sci- ence & Business Media (Vol. 66), 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Boggiatto and E

    P. Boggiatto and E. Cordero, Anti-Wick quantization wit h symbols in Lp spaces, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 130(9), 2679–2685 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    Boggiatto and E

    P. Boggiatto and E. Cordero, Anti-Wick quantization of t empered dis- tributions. In Progress in Analysis : (In 2 Volumes), pp. 655–662, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Boggiatto, E

    P. Boggiatto, E. Cordero, and K. Gr¨ ochenig, Generalize d anti-Wick operators with symbols in distributional Sobolev spaces, Integr. Equat. Oper. Th. 48(4), 427–442 (2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Cordero and K

    E. Cordero and K. Gr¨ ochenig, Time-Frequency analysis o f localization operators, J. Funct. Anal. 205, 107–131 (2003)

    work page 2003

  8. [8]

    Cordero and K

    E. Cordero and K. Gr¨ ochenig, Necessary conditions for S chatten Class Localization Operators, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 133(12), 3573–3579 (2005)

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Cordero and L

    E. Cordero and L. Rodino, Wick calculus: a time-frequenc y approach, Osaka J. Math. 42(1), 43–63 (2005)

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Du and M.W

    J. Du and M.W. Wong, A trace formula for Weyl transforms, Approx. Theory. Appl. (N.S.) 16(1), 41–45 (2000)

    work page 2000

  11. [11]

    Engliˇ s, An excursion into Berezin–Toeplitz quantization and related topics, Quantization, PDEs, and Geometry , 69–115, Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2016

    M. Engliˇ s, An excursion into Berezin–Toeplitz quantization and related topics, Quantization, PDEs, and Geometry , 69–115, Birkh¨ auser, Cham, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Faulhuber, M.A

    M. Faulhuber, M.A. de Gosson, D. Rottensteiner, Gaussi an Distribu- tions and Phase Space Weyl–Heisenberg Frames, arXiv:1708. 01 [to ap- pear in Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. (2019)]

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Feichtinger, On a new Segal algebra , Monatsh

    H.G. Feichtinger, On a new Segal algebra , Monatsh. Math. 92(4), (1981), 269–289

    work page 1981

  14. [14]

    Feichtinger, Modulation spaces on locally compac t abelian groups

    H.G. Feichtinger, Modulation spaces on locally compac t abelian groups. Universit¨ at Wien. Mathematisches Institut, 1983

    work page 1983

  15. [15]

    Feichtinger, Modulation spaces: looking back and ahead, Sam- pling Theory in Signal and Image Processing 5(2), 109 (2006)

    H.G. Feichtinger, Modulation spaces: looking back and ahead, Sam- pling Theory in Signal and Image Processing 5(2), 109 (2006)

    work page 2006

  16. [16]

    de Gosson, Symplectic Methods in Harmonic Analysis and in Math- ematical Physics

    M. de Gosson, Symplectic Methods in Harmonic Analysis and in Math- ematical Physics . Birkh¨ auser, Basel, 2011 11

    work page 2011

  17. [17]

    Folland, Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Princeton Univ

    G.B. Folland, Harmonic Analysis in Phase Space, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1989

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    de Gosson, Hamiltonian deformations of Gabor frames : First steps

    M. de Gosson, Hamiltonian deformations of Gabor frames : First steps. Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 38(2), 196–221 (2014)

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    de Gosson, Introduction to Born–Jordan Quantization: Theory and applications

    M. de Gosson, Introduction to Born–Jordan Quantization: Theory and applications. Springer–Verlag, series Fundamental Theories of Physics , 2016

    work page 2016

  20. [20]

    de Gosson, The Canonical Group of Transformations of a Weyl– Heisenberg Frame; Applications to Gaussian and Hermitian F rames, J

    M. de Gosson, The Canonical Group of Transformations of a Weyl– Heisenberg Frame; Applications to Gaussian and Hermitian F rames, J. Geom. Phys. 114, 375–383 (2017)

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    de Gosson, The Wigner Transform , World Scientific Publishing Company, 2017

    M. de Gosson, The Wigner Transform , World Scientific Publishing Company, 2017

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    A Symplectic Interpretation of the Separability of Gaussian Mixed States

    M. de Gosson, A Symplectic Interpretation of the Separa bility of Gaus- sian Mixed States, arXiv:1809.00184v2 [quant-ph] (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    de Gosson, Quantum harmonic analysis of the density m atrix, Quanta 7(1), 74–110 (2018)

    M. de Gosson, Quantum harmonic analysis of the density m atrix, Quanta 7(1), 74–110 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Gr¨ ochenig, , An uncertainty principle related to th e Poisson sum- mation formula, Stud

    K. Gr¨ ochenig, , An uncertainty principle related to th e Poisson sum- mation formula, Stud. Math . 1(121), 87–104 (1996)

    work page 1996

  25. [25]

    Gr¨ ochenig,Foundations of time-frequency analysis , Springer Science & Business Media; 2001

    K. Gr¨ ochenig,Foundations of time-frequency analysis , Springer Science & Business Media; 2001

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    Gr¨ ochenig, Time-Frequency Analysis of Sj¨ ostrand’s Class, Rev

    K. Gr¨ ochenig, Time-Frequency Analysis of Sj¨ ostrand’s Class, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 22(2), 703–724 (2006)

    work page 2006

  27. [27]

    Gr¨ ochenig and J

    K. Gr¨ ochenig and J. Toft, Isomorphism properties of Toeplitz operators and pseudo-differential operators between modulation space s, J. Anal. Math. 114(1), 255 (2011)

    work page 2011

  28. [28]

    Jakobsen, On a (no longer) new Segal algebra: a revi ew of the Feichtinger algebra, J

    M.S. Jakobsen, On a (no longer) new Segal algebra: a revi ew of the Feichtinger algebra, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 1–82 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Kobayashi and M

    M. Kobayashi and M. Sugimoto, The inclusion relation be tween Sobolev and modulation spaces, J. Funct. Anal. 260(11), 3189–3208 (2011)

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    Littlejohn, The semiclassical evolution of wave p ackets, Phys

    R.G. Littlejohn, The semiclassical evolution of wave p ackets, Phys. Reps. 138 (4–5), 193–291 (1986) 12

    work page 1986

  31. [31]

    Luef and E

    F. Luef and E. Skrettingland, Convolutions for localiz ation operators, J. Math. Pures Appl . 118, 288–316 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    Shubin, Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory , Springer-Verlag, (1987) [original Russian edition in Nauk a, Moskva (1978)]

    M.A. Shubin, Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory , Springer-Verlag, (1987) [original Russian edition in Nauk a, Moskva (1978)]

    work page 1987

  33. [33]

    Werner, Quantum harmonic analysis on phase space, J

    R. Werner, Quantum harmonic analysis on phase space, J. Math. Phys. 25(5), 1404–1411 (1984)

    work page 1984

  34. [34]

    Toft, Continuity and Schatten Properties for Toeplitz Operators on Modulation Spaces , In: Toft J

    J. Toft, Continuity and Schatten Properties for Toeplitz Operators on Modulation Spaces , In: Toft J. (eds) Modern Trends in Pseudo- Differential Operators. Operator Theory: Advances and Appli cations, vol 172. Birkh¨ auser Basel, 2006 13

    work page 2006