pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.02988 · v1 · pith:DDYR6WIOnew · submitted 2019-07-05 · ✦ hep-th · hep-lat

Lattice methods for students at a formal TASI

Thomas DeGrand This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-lat
keywords lattice field theoryquantum field theoryconfinementchiral fermionsIsing modelQCDnon-perturbative methodsTASI lectures
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lattice field theory lectures supply physical motivation rather than full technical details for formal quantum field theory students.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents lectures on lattice field theory written specifically for TASI students focused on formal aspects of quantum field theory. It aims to convey why lattice methods are used in calculations by emphasizing physical pictures such as confinement and the removal of the lattice spacing. The material walks through the elements of a typical lattice computation, addresses the implementation of chiral fermions, and illustrates the ideas with the three-dimensional Ising model and QCD. A sympathetic reader would care because the lectures make these non-perturbative tools approachable without first requiring mastery of every algorithmic step.

Core claim

The lectures claim that the physical motivation behind lattice regularization of quantum field theories, including the appearance of confinement and the procedure for recovering continuum physics, can be conveyed directly to formal-theory students, together with an overview of calculation components, the special treatment required for chiral fermions, and concrete examples drawn from the three-dimensional Ising model and QCD.

What carries the argument

The lattice as a discrete spacetime regulator that enables non-perturbative computations while allowing a controlled approach to the continuum limit.

If this is right

  • Lattice methods make the phenomenon of confinement accessible to direct computation in gauge theories.
  • Chiral fermions can be placed on the lattice through formulations that respect their properties in the continuum limit.
  • The three-dimensional Ising model serves as a controlled test case for lattice techniques before application to four-dimensional QCD.
  • An overview of the parts of a lattice calculation reveals the sequence from action formulation to measurement of physical observables.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The motivational framing could allow formal theorists to incorporate lattice results into analytic work more quickly.
  • The same structure of presentation might be adapted to other non-perturbative regulators such as functional methods or tensor networks.
  • Case studies limited to the Ising model and QCD leave open whether similar motivation applies equally to lattice studies of supersymmetric or conformal theories.

Load-bearing premise

That an overview centered on physical motivation supplies enough background for the intended audience without complete technical derivations.

What would settle it

A follow-up check whether students who attended the lectures could outline the steps of a basic lattice QCD calculation or identify the role of the continuum limit without consulting additional technical references.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.02988 by Thomas DeGrand.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Gauge invariant observables are either (a) ordered c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: An [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: An old picture (circa 2007) illustrating Eq. 40. The d [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Coming into equilibrium (in a QCD simulation): notic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: An atypically nice lattice correlator and its fit. In t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Connected (a) and disconnected (b) quark diagrams co [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: An unamputated diagram used in computing a form facto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Bound on (∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: The maximum of the susceptibility [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Curve collapse in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Results for the critical exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Results from Ref. [53] for the critical exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Results from Ref. [53] for the critical exponent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Hadron spectrum from lattice QCD. Comprehensive re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Spectroscopy for mesonic systems containing one or [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Comparison of the dimensionless combination [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: (a) Vector meson mass versus quark mass. (b) Squared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Baryon spectroscopy in units of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

These lectures about lattice field theory were written for, and given at, TASI 2019, ``The many dimensions of quantum field theory.'' The students at this TASI were mostly interested in formal things, and so these are slightly unusual lattice lectures: I wanted to give the physical motivation behind lattice calculations rather than describe all the technical details. A quick outline: (1) The really big picture: lattice basics, lattice confinement, getting rid of the lattice. (2) A walk through the parts of a lattice calculation -- an overview, to show what's involved. (3) Chiral fermions on the lattice. (This part might be interesting to lattice people.) (4) Case studies: the three dimensional Ising model, and QCD.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. These lecture notes, prepared for TASI 2019 on the many dimensions of quantum field theory, supply physical motivation for lattice field theory methods to an audience primarily interested in formal aspects of QFT. The notes outline lattice basics and confinement, the process of removing the lattice, an overview of the components of a lattice calculation, chiral fermions on the lattice, and case studies of the three-dimensional Ising model and QCD, deliberately emphasizing motivation over exhaustive technical implementation details.

Significance. If the motivations are conveyed accurately, the notes provide a useful bridge for formal theorists to lattice techniques by focusing on physical intuition rather than derivations, which aligns with the stated goal for the TASI audience. The pedagogical framing and selection of topics (including the dedicated section on chiral fermions) represent a strength for this context.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The parenthetical remark in the abstract that the chiral fermions section 'might be interesting to lattice people' is informal and could be removed or rephrased for consistency with the rest of the manuscript.
  2. A short list of suggested references for readers seeking the technical details omitted from the overview sections would improve utility without altering the motivational focus.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive report and the recommendation to accept the manuscript. The notes were prepared specifically for the TASI audience of formal theorists, and we are glad the pedagogical approach and topic selection were viewed as appropriate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: pedagogical lecture notes with no derivations or claims

full rationale

The paper consists of TASI lecture notes whose explicit purpose is to supply physical motivation for lattice methods rather than technical derivations or novel results. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or load-bearing claims are present that could reduce to inputs by construction, self-citation, or renaming. The central content is an overview of motivation and case studies, which is self-contained and independent of any circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an educational exposition with no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5640 in / 789 out tokens · 22416 ms · 2026-05-25T02:02:56.916711+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages · 59 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doubling problem

    Fermionic Monte Carlo Lattice fermions are really annoying. First of all, it is tricky to write do wn a lattice fermion action with the right number of degrees of freedom. (This is called the “doubling problem.”) Second, computers can’t deal with Grassmann variables and so you have to integrate them out exactly before the simulation starts. This is har d ...

    work page 2008

  2. [2]

    A peak at L1/ν (T − Tc) = v0 (or T =Tpeak, so Tpeak =Tc +v0L− 1/ν )

    work page

  3. [3]

    A width of ∆ T =v1L− 1/ν

    work page

  4. [4]

    improved

    A height scaling like Lγ/ν Item (1) implies that the apparent Tc is shifted; items (2) and (3) that the peak in χ rises and narrows with L. There is an example of this, mentioned in a paper about duality transf ormations in three dimensional topological insulators by Metlitski and Vishwanath [55]. They refer to a lattice study of the three-dimensional Gin...

    work page

  5. [5]

    [62]), but how to get confinement was u nknown before Wilson

    and Gross and Wilczek [61] came the realization that QCD was the t heory of the strong interactions (compare Ref. [62]), but how to get confinement was u nknown before Wilson. The name “QCD” is Gell-Mann’s. Wilson and Kogut and Susskind and othe rs did strong coupling calculations in the 70’s. Monte Carlo for pure gauge theories began with Creutz in 1979 a...

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    fundamental

    chiral symmetry breaking, when the constituents are light We use bits of asymptotic freedom in our simulations (taking the bare coupling to zero takes the lattice spacing to zero), and some of us measure lattice q uantities which give a running coupling as an output, but we tend not to think in terms of Λ p arameters (say, to set the overall scale). They ...

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    Lattice methods for quantum c hromodynamics,

    T. DeGrand and C. E. Detar, “Lattice methods for quantum c hromodynamics,” New Jersey, USA: World Scientific (2006) 345 p

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice,

    C. Gattringer and C. B. Lang, “Quantum chromodynamics on the lattice,” Lect. Notes Phys. 788, 1 (2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01850-3 2010

  9. [9]

    Lattice Quantu m Chromodynamics: Practical Essentials,

    F. Knechtli, M. G¨ unther and M. Peardon, “Lattice Quantu m Chromodynamics: Practical Essentials,” doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0999-4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-024-0999-4

  10. [10]

    Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Dummies

    M. Hanada, “Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Dummies,” arXiv :1808.08490 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 10, 2445 (1974). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2445 1974

  12. [12]

    J. M. Drouffe and C. Itzykson, Phys. Rept. 38, 133 (1978). doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90154-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(78)90154-0 1978

  13. [13]

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D 11, 395 (1975). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.11.395

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.11.395 1975

  14. [14]

    Non-perturbative computation of gluon mini-jet production in nuclear collisions at very high energies

    A. Krasnitz and R. Venugopalan, Nucl. Phys. B 557, 237 (1999) doi:10.1016/S0550- 3213(99)00366-1 [hep-ph/9809433]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0550- 1999

  15. [15]

    K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, Phys. Rept. 12, 75 (1974). doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4 1974

  16. [16]

    Creutz, Phys

    M. Creutz, Phys. Rev. D 21, 2308 (1980). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2308

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.2308 1980

  17. [17]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953). doi:10.1063/1.1699114

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1699114 1953

  18. [18]

    Actions for dynamical fermion simulations: are we ready to go?

    K. Jansen, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 129, 3 (2004) doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02502-7 [hep-lat/0311039]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(03)02502-7 2004

  19. [19]

    Lattice tests of beyond Standard Model dynamics

    T. DeGrand, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 015001 (2016) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015001 [arXiv:1510.05018 [hep-ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015001 2016

  20. [20]

    Exact lattice supersymmetry

    S. Catterall, D. B. Kaplan and M. Unsal, Phys. Rept. 484, 71 (2009) doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.09.001 [arXiv:0903.4881 [h ep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.09.001 2009

  21. [21]

    G. T. Fleming, J. B. Kogut and P. M. Vranas, Phys. Rev. D 64, 034510 (2001) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.64.034510 [hep-lat/0008009]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.64.034510 2001

  22. [22]

    Giedt, R

    J. Giedt, R. Brower, S. Catterall, G. T. Fleming and P. Vr anas, Phys. Rev. D 79, 025015 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.025015 [arXiv:0810.574 6 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.025015 2009

  23. [23]

    M. G. Endres, Phys. Rev. D 79, 094503 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.094503 [arXiv:0902.4267 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.094503 2009

  24. [24]

    S. W. Kim et al. [JLQCD Collaboration], PoS LATTICE 2011, 069 (2011) doi:10.22323/1.139.0069 [arXiv:1111.2180 [hep-lat]]. 45

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.139.0069 2011

  25. [25]

    Towards the spectrum of low-lying particles in supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory

    G. Bergner, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster, U. D. ¨Ozugurel and D. Sandbrink, JHEP 1311, 061 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)061 [arXiv:1304.2168 [h ep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)061 2013

  26. [26]

    S. Ali, G. Bergner, H. Gerber, I. Montvay, G. M¨ unster, S . Piemonte and P. Scior, arXiv:1902.11127 [hep-lat]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  27. [27]

    N=4 Supersymmetry on a Space-Time Lattice

    S. Catterall, D. Schaich, P. H. Damgaard, T. DeGrand and J. Giedt, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 6, 065013 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.065013 [arXiv: 1405.0644 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.065013 2014

  28. [28]

    Phase Structure of Lattice N=4 Super Yang-Mills

    S. Catterall, P. H. Damgaard, T. Degrand, R. Galvez and D . Mehta, JHEP 1211, 072 (2012) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2012)072 [arXiv:1209.5285 [hep-lat ]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2012)072 2012

  29. [29]

    Schaich, arXiv:1810.09282 [hep-lat]

    D. Schaich, arXiv:1810.09282 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Direct test of the AdS/CFT correspondence by Monte Carlo studies of N=4 super Yang-Mills theory

    M. Honda, G. Ishiki, S. W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchi ya, JHEP 1311, 200 (2013) doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2013)200 [arXiv:1308.3525 [hep-th] ]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep11(2013)200 2013

  31. [31]

    Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer

    M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, G. Ishiki and J. Nishimura, Sci ence 344, 882 (2014) doi:10.1126/science.1250122 [arXiv:1311.5607 [hep-th] ]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.1250122 2014

  32. [32]

    Testing the AdS/CFT correspondence by Monte Carlo calculation of BPS and non-BPS Wilson loops in 4d N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory

    M. Honda, G. Ishiki, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, PoS LA TTICE 2011, 244 (2011) doi:10.22323/1.139.0244 [arXiv:1112.4274 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.139.0244 2011

  33. [33]

    Testing a novel large-N reduction for N=4 super Yang-Mills theory on RxS^3

    G. Ishiki, S. W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, JHEP 0909, 029 (2009) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/029 [arXiv:0907.1488 [h ep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2009/09/029 2009

  34. [34]

    N=4 Super Yang-Mills from the Plane Wave Matrix Model

    T. Ishii, G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki and A. Tsuchiya, Phys. Rev. D 78, 106001 (2008) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.106001 [arXiv:0807.2352 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.106001 2008

  35. [35]

    Deconfinement phase transition in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory on RxS^3 from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics

    G. Ishiki, S. W. Kim, J. Nishimura and A. Tsuchiya, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 111601 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.111601 [arXiv:0810.2884 [ hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.111601 2009

  36. [36]

    Topological Insulators -- A review

    R. Shankar, “Topological insulators – a review,” arXiv :1804.06471

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect,

    D. Tong, “Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect,” arXiv:160 6.06687 [hep-th]

    work page

  38. [38]

    H. B. Nielsen and M. Ninomiya, Nucl. Phys. B 185, 20 (1981) Erratum: [Nucl. Phys. B 195, 541 (1982)]. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90361-8, 10.1016 /0550-3213(82)90011-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90361-8 1981

  39. [40]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.13.3398

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.13.3398 1976

  40. [41]

    D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett. B 288, 342 (1992) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91112-M [hep-lat/9206013]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(92)91112-m 1992

  41. [42]

    Chiral Fermions from Lattice Boundaries

    Y. Shamir, Nucl. Phys. B 406, 90 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90162-I [hep-lat/9303005]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90162-i 1993

  42. [44]

    M. F. L. Golterman, K. Jansen and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Lett . B 301, 219 (1993) doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90692-B [hep-lat/9209003]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90692-b 1993

  43. [46]

    P. H. Ginsparg and K. G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D 25, 2649 (1982). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2649

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.2649 1982

  44. [47]

    Exactly massless quarks on the lattice

    H. Neuberger, Phys. Lett. B 417, 141 (1998) doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(97)01368-3 [hep-lat/9707022]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(97)01368-3 1998

  45. [48]

    Chiral gauge theories revisited

    M. Luscher, Subnucl. Ser. 38, 41 (2002) doi:10.1142/9789812778253 0002 [hep-th/0102028]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789812778253 2002

  46. [49]

    R. C. Brower, H. Neff and K. Orginos, Comput. Phys. Commun . 220, 1 (2017) doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.024 [arXiv:1206.5214 [hep-l at]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2017.01.024 2017

  47. [50]

    Lattice Chiral Gauge Theories

    M. Golterman, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 94, 189 (2001) doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)00953-7 46 [hep-lat/0011027]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(01)00953-7 2001

  48. [51]

    SU(N) chiral gauge theories on the lattice

    M. Golterman and Y. Shamir, Phys. Rev. D 70, 094506 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.094506 [hep-lat/0404011]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.094506 2004

  49. [52]

    Eichten and J

    E. Eichten and J. Preskill, Nucl. Phys. B 268, 179 (1986). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90207-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90207-5 1986

  50. [53]

    M. F. L. Golterman, D. N. Petcher and E. Rivas, Nucl. Phys . B 395, 596 (1993) doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90049-U [hep-lat/9206010]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/0550-3213(93)90049-u 1993

  51. [54]

    Luscher, JHEP 0006, 028 (2000) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/028 [hep-lat /0006014]

    M. Luscher, JHEP 0006, 028 (2000) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/028 [hep-lat /0006014]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2000/06/028 2000

  52. [55]

    D. M. Grabowska and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. D 94, no. 11, 114504 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.114504 [arXiv:1610.02151 [hep -lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.114504 2016

  53. [56]

    D. M. Grabowska and D. B. Kaplan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, no. 21, 211602 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.211602 [arXiv:1511.03649 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.211602 2016

  54. [57]

    TASI Lectures on the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin, “The Conformal Bootstrap,” in the Pro ceedings of TASI - 2015, New Jer- sey, USA: World Scientific (2016); doi:10.1142/9789813149 441 0001 [arXiv:1602.07982 [hep- th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/9789813149 2015

  55. [58]

    A Semidefinite Program Solver for the Conformal Bootstrap

    D. Simmons-Duffin, JHEP 1506, 174 (2015) doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2015)174 [arXiv:1502.02033 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)174 2015

  56. [59]

    A Finite Size Scaling Study of Lattice Models in the three-dimensional Ising Universality Class

    M. Hasenbusch, Phys. Rev. B 82, 174433 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.174433 [arXiv:1004.4486 [cond-mat.stat-mech]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.174433 2010

  57. [60]

    Scaling And Renormalization In Statistic al Physics,

    J. L. Cardy, “Scaling And Renormalization In Statistic al Physics,” Cambridge, UK: Univ. Pr. (1996). (Cambridge lecture notes in physics: 3)

    work page 1996

  58. [61]

    M. A. Metlitski and A. Vishwanath, Phys. Rev. B 93, no. 24, 245151 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.245151 [arXiv:1505.05142 [con d-mat.str-el]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.245151 2016

  59. [62]

    Masses and Phase Structure in the Ginzburg-Landau Model

    K. Kajantie, M. Karjalainen, M. Laine and J. Peisa, Phys . Rev. B 57, 3011 (1998) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.57.3011 [cond-mat/9704056]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevb.57.3011 1998

  60. [63]

    M. E. Fisher and A. N. Berker, Phys. Rev. B 26, 2507 (1982). doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.26.2507

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.26.2507 1982

  61. [64]

    Cheng, A

    A. Cheng, A. Hasenfratz, Y. Liu, G. Petropoulos and D. Sc haich, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 1, 014509 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.014509 [arXiv:14 01.0195 [hep-lat]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.014509 2014

  62. [65]

    Finite-size scaling tests for SU(3) lattice gauge theory with color sextet fermions

    T. DeGrand, Phys. Rev. D 80, no. 11, 114507 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.80.114507 [arXiv:0910.3072 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.114507 2009

  63. [66]

    H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1346

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1346 1973

  64. [67]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.1343

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.30.1343 1973

  65. [68]

    Fritzsch, M

    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. 47B, 365 (1973). doi:10.1016/0370- 2693(73)90625-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1973

  66. [69]

    TASI Lectures on Remnants from the String Landscape

    J. Halverson and P. Langacker, PoS TASI 2017, 019 (2018) doi:10.22323/1.305.0019 [arXiv:1801.03503 [hep-th]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.22323/1.305.0019 2017

  67. [70]

    Meson spectra of asymptotically free gauge theories from holography

    J. Erdmenger, N. Evans and M. Scott, Phys. Rev. D 91, no. 8, 085004 (2015) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.085004 [arXiv:1412.3165 [hep- ph]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.085004 2015

  68. [71]

    A. M. Polyakov, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 429 (1977). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90086-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(77)90086-4 1977

  69. [72]

    GAUGE FIELDS AND STRINGS,

    A. M. Polyakov, “GAUGE FIELDS AND STRINGS,” CHUR, SWITZERLAND: HAR- WOOD (1987) 301 P. (CONTEMPORARY CONCEPTS IN PHYSICS, 3)

    work page 1987

  70. [73]

    M. E. Peskin, Nucl. Phys. B 175, 197 (1980). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90051-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(80)90051-6 1980

  71. [74]

    Preskill, Nucl

    J. Preskill, Nucl. Phys. B 177, 21 (1981). doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90265-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(81)90265-0 1981

  72. [75]

    D. A. Kosower, Phys. Lett. 144B, 215 (1984). doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91806-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(84)91806-9 1984

  73. [76]

    Tanabashi et al

    M. Tanabashi et al. [Particle Data Group], Phys. Rev. D 98, no. 3, 030001 (2018). doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.030001 47

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.030001 2018

  74. [77]

    Light hadrons with improved staggered quarks: approaching the continuum limit

    C. Aubin et al. , Phys. Rev. D 70, 094505 (2004) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.094505 [hep-lat/0402030]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.094505 2004

  75. [78]

    Full nonperturbative QCD simulations with 2+1 flavors of improved staggered quarks

    A. Bazavov et al. [MILC Collaboration], Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1349 (2010) doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.1349 [arXiv:0903.3598 [hep- lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.1349 2010

  76. [79]

    2+1 Flavor Lattice QCD toward the Physical Point

    S. Aoki et al. [PACS-CS Collaboration], Phys. Rev. D 79, 034503 (2009) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.034503 [arXiv:0807.1661 [hep- lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.034503 2009

  77. [80]

    Durr et al

    S. Durr et al. , Science 322, 1224 (2008) doi:10.1126/science.1163233 [arXiv:0906.3 599 [hep- lat]]

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1163233 2008

  78. [81]

    Flavour blindness and patterns of flavour symmetry breaking in lattice simulations of up, down and strange quarks

    W. Bietenholz et al. , Phys. Rev. D 84, 054509 (2011) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.054509 [arXiv:1102.5300 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.054509 2011

  79. [82]

    Baryon spectrum with $N_f=2+1+1$ twisted mass fermions

    C. Alexandrou, V. Drach, K. Jansen, C. Kallidonis and G. Koutsou, Phys. Rev. D 90, no. 7, 074501 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.074501 [arXiv: 1406.4310 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.074501 2014

  80. [83]

    N. H. Christ et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 241601 (2010) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.241601 [arXiv:1002.2999 [hep-lat]]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.241601 2010

Showing first 80 references.