pith. sign in

arxiv: 1907.04746 · v1 · pith:IJHZBQWVnew · submitted 2019-07-10 · 🌀 gr-qc

On-axis scattering of scalar fields by charged rotating black holes

Luiz C. S. Leite , Carolina L. Benone , Lu\'is C. B. Crispino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 23:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords scalar field scatteringKerr-Newman black holepartial wave methodon-axis incidencescattering cross sectionclassical limitsemiclassical approximationgeneral relativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Numerical partial-wave sums for on-axis scalar scattering by Kerr-Newman black holes match classical geodesic and semiclassical formulas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the differential cross section for a massless scalar field incident along the symmetry axis of a charged rotating black hole by decomposing the wave into partial waves and summing the far-field contributions. These numerical values are compared directly to the classical result obtained from null geodesic deflection and to a semiclassical eikonal approximation. The comparison shows close agreement over a range of black-hole masses, charges, and spins, and the authors display representative angular distributions. A reader cares because the match confirms that wave optics and ray optics describe the same scattering process in the strong-field regime when incidence is axial.

Core claim

The on-axis scattering cross section of a massless scalar field by a Kerr-Newman black hole, obtained by summing partial-wave contributions to the asymptotic amplitude, reproduces both the classical cross section derived from null geodesics and the semiclassical cross section obtained from the eikonal phase shift, with the numerical and analytic curves overlapping closely for multiple values of the black-hole parameters.

What carries the argument

Partial-wave decomposition of the scalar wave equation on the Kerr-Newman background, followed by numerical summation of the phase-shifted spherical-wave terms to form the scattering amplitude.

If this is right

  • The classical geodesic picture and the wave picture coincide for on-axis scalar incidence on charged rotating black holes.
  • Charge and rotation shift the locations and heights of the forward glory and spiral scattering peaks in the cross section.
  • The same numerical partial-wave procedure can be applied to other fixed values of charge and spin to map the dependence of the cross section.
  • Plots for different parameter sets illustrate how the scattering pattern changes with black-hole rotation and charge.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The demonstrated agreement supplies a benchmark that later calculations for off-axis incidence or for other fields could use to test their own numerical convergence.
  • If the same level of agreement persists at higher frequencies, the result would tighten the regime where semiclassical methods remain reliable for black-hole scattering.
  • The axial symmetry exploited here isolates the effect of frame-dragging without azimuthal mixing, suggesting a clean test case for extensions that include absorption or superradiance.

Load-bearing premise

The truncated partial-wave sum converges to sufficient accuracy that any remaining difference from the analytic formulas is smaller than the plotted agreement.

What would settle it

A recomputation of the partial-wave sum for a chosen set of black-hole parameters that deviates from the classical deflection-angle formula by more than the numerical tolerance shown in the paper's plots.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1907.04746 by Carolina L. Benone, Lu\'is C. B. Crispino, Luiz C. S. Leite.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison between the scalar scattering cross section and the classi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the scattering of a massless scalar field by a Kerr-Newman black hole, considering the case of on-axis incidence. We use the partial wave method to find numerical results for the scattering cross section, which we compare with classical and semiclassical analytical results, obtaining excellent agreement. We present a selection of plots for different values of the black hole parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates on-axis scattering of a massless scalar field by Kerr-Newman black holes. It employs the partial wave method to compute numerical scattering cross sections and compares these to independent classical and semiclassical analytical results, reporting excellent agreement across selected black hole parameters, with results illustrated in plots.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies concrete benchmarks validating analytical approximations for wave scattering off charged rotating black holes. This is useful in black hole perturbation theory, where such cross-checks help delineate the regime of validity of semiclassical methods without introducing fitted parameters or circular comparisons.

major comments (1)
  1. [Numerical implementation / results section] The description of the partial-wave implementation does not specify the truncation criterion for the sum over angular modes (maximum multipole l), the convergence tests performed for each frequency and black-hole parameter set, or quantitative error estimates on the cross section. This information is required to substantiate the central claim of excellent agreement, as the numerical result is only as reliable as the controlled truncation of the on-axis partial-wave sum.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and figure captions] The abstract and figure captions would be clearer if they explicitly stated the range of frequencies and black-hole parameters (a, Q, M) over which the agreement is claimed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comment on the numerical implementation. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical implementation / results section] The description of the partial-wave implementation does not specify the truncation criterion for the sum over angular modes (maximum multipole l), the convergence tests performed for each frequency and black-hole parameter set, or quantitative error estimates on the cross section. This information is required to substantiate the central claim of excellent agreement, as the numerical result is only as reliable as the controlled truncation of the on-axis partial-wave sum.

    Authors: We agree that these details are necessary to fully substantiate the numerical results and the reported agreement. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit description of the truncation criterion (the value of l_max chosen such that further increase changes the differential cross section by less than a specified tolerance), the convergence tests performed by successively increasing the number of modes for representative frequencies and black-hole parameters, and quantitative error estimates (e.g., the relative variation in the cross section when l_max is increased by 20 %). These additions will be placed in the numerical-results section and will directly support the claim of excellent agreement with the classical and semiclassical benchmarks. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; numerical partial-wave results validated against independent analytics

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a numerical computation of on-axis scalar scattering cross sections via the standard partial-wave method on the Kerr-Newman background, followed by direct comparison to separate classical and semiclassical analytic expressions. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that bears the load of the result, and the reported agreement is presented as an external check rather than an internal identity. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the standard Kerr-Newman metric and the validity of the partial-wave decomposition in asymptotically flat spacetime; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Kerr-Newman metric is the unique stationary axisymmetric solution to Einstein-Maxwell equations for a charged rotating black hole.
    Invoked implicitly as the background spacetime for the scattering problem.
  • domain assumption The partial wave method applies to the massless scalar wave equation on this background for on-axis incidence.
    Basis for the numerical computation described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1206 out tokens · 27172 ms · 2026-05-24T23:39:22.221718+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 25 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Bi- nary Black Hole Merger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 061102. doi: {10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102}. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (24) (2016) 241103. arXiv:1606.04855, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.241103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (22) (2017) 221101, [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett.121,no.12,129901(2018)]. arXiv:1706.01812, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118. 221101,10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.129901

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118 2017

  4. [4]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., GW170608: Observation of a 19-solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Astrophys. J. 851 (2) (2017) L35. arXiv: 1711.05578, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa9f0c 2017

  5. [5]

    B. P. Abbott, et al., GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Grav- itational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (14) (2017) 141101. arXiv:1709.09660, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.119.141101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [7]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 , keywords =

    K. Akiyama, et al., First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. 875 (1) (2019) L1. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7 2019

  7. [8]

    F. W. Dyson, A. S. Eddington, C. Davidson, A Determination of the Deflection of Light by the Sun’s Gravitational Field, from Observations Made at the Total Eclipse of May 29, 1919, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 220 (1920) 291–333. doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.1920.0009 1919

  8. [9]

    L. C. Crispino, D. J. Kennefick, A hundred years of the first experimental test of general relativity, Nature Physics 15 (5) (2019) 416

    work page 2019

  9. [10]

    Apparent shape of super-spinning black holes

    C. Bambi, K. Freese, Apparent shape of super-spinning black holes, Phys. Rev. D79 (2009) 043002. arXiv:0812.1328, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.79.043002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  10. [11]

    Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spectrum: II. Black-Hole Images

    T. Johannsen, D. Psaltis, Testing the No-Hair Theorem with Observa- tions in the Electromagnetic Spectrum: II. Black-Hole Images, Astro- phys. J. 718 (2010) 446–454. arXiv:1005.1931, doi:10.1088/ 0004-637X/718/1/446

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  11. [12]

    Atamurotov, A

    F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, Shadow of rotating non- Kerr black hole, Phys. Rev. D88 (6) (2013) 064004. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.88.064004

    work page 2013

  12. [13]

    A General Relativistic Null Hypothesis Test with Event Horizon Telescope Observations of the black-hole shadow in Sgr A*

    D. Psaltis, F. Ozel, C.-K. Chan, D. P. Marrone, A General Relativistic Null Hypothesis Test with Event Horizon Telescope Observations of the black-hole shadow in Sgr A*, Astrophys. J. 814 (2) (2015) 115. arXiv: 1411.1454, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/115

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/2/115 2015

  13. [14]

    A Quantitative Test of the No-Hair Theorem with Sgr A* using stars, pulsars, and the Event Horizon Telescope

    D. Psaltis, N. Wex, M. Kramer, A Quantitative Test of the No-Hair The- orem with Sgr A* using stars, pulsars, and the Event Horizon Tele- scope, Astrophys. J. 818 (2) (2016) 121. arXiv:1510.00394, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/818/2/121

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/2/121 2016

  14. [17]

    P. V . P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. F. Runarsson, Shad- ows of Kerr black holes with and without scalar hair, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 5 D25 (09) (2016) 1641021. arXiv:1605.08293, doi:10.1142/ S0218271816410212

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [18]

    P. V . P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, E. Radu, Shadows of Einstein–dilaton–Gauss–Bonnet black holes, Phys. Lett. B768 (2017) 373–379. arXiv:1701.00079, doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2017.03.020

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2017

  16. [19]

    M. Wang, S. Chen, J. Jing, Shadow casted by a Konoplya-Zhidenko rotating non-Kerr black hole, JCAP 1710 (10) (2017) 051. arXiv: 1707.09451, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/051

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/10/051 2017

  17. [20]

    P. V . P. Cunha, C. A. R. Herdeiro, Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review, Gen. Rel. Grav. 50 (4) (2018) 42. arXiv: 1801.00860, doi:10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9 2018

  18. [21]

    S. B. Giddings, D. Psaltis, Event Horizon Telescope Observations as Probes for Quantum Structure of Astrophysical Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D97 (8) (2018) 084035. arXiv:1606.07814, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.97.084035

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  19. [22]

    R. A. Matzner, C. DeWitt-Morette, B. Nelson, T.-R. Zhang, Glory scat- tering by black holes, Phys. Rev. D 31 (8) (1985) 1869–1878. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.31.1869. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.31. 1869

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.31.1869 1985

  20. [23]

    Anninos, C

    P. Anninos, C. DeWitt-Morette, R. A. Matzner, P. Yioutas, T. R. Zhang, Orbiting cross-sections: Application to black hole scattering, Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 4477–4494. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.46.4477

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.46.4477 1992

  21. [24]

    S. R. Dolan, T. Stratton, Rainbow scattering in the gravitational field of a compact object, Phys. Rev. D95 (12) (2017) 124055. arXiv:1702. 06127, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124055

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.124055 2017

  22. [25]

    K. W. Ford, J. A. Wheeler, Semiclassical description of scattering, An- nals of Physics 7 (1959) 259. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(59) 90026-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(59 1959

  23. [26]

    R. G. Newton, Scattering theory of waves and particles, Springer Science & Business Media, 1982

    work page 1982

  24. [27]

    H. M. Nussenzveig, Diffraction effects in semiclassical scattering, V ol. 1, Cambridge University Press, 2006

    work page 2006

  25. [28]

    L. F. Canto, M. S. Hussein, Scattering Theory of Molecules, Atoms, and Nuclei, World Scientific, 2013

    work page 2013

  26. [29]

    S. A. Teukolsky, W. H. Press, Perturbations of a rotating black hole. III - Interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnetic radiation, Astrophys. J. 193 (1974) 443–461. doi:10.1086/153180

    work page doi:10.1086/153180 1974

  27. [30]

    C. F. B. Macedo, L. C. S. Leite, E. S. Oliveira, S. R. Dolan, L. C. B. Crispino, Absorption of planar massless scalar waves by Kerr black holes, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064033. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88. 064033. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.88. 064033

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.88 2013

  28. [32]

    L. C. S. Leite, C. L. Benone, L. C. B. Crispino, Scalar absorption by charged rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 044043. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.044043. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.96. 044043

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.044043 2017

  29. [33]

    Singularity

    R. A. Matzner, Scattering of Massless Scalar Waves by a Schwarzschild “Singularity”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 9 (1) (1968) 163–170. doi:10.1063/1.1664470

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1664470 1968

  30. [34]

    N. G. Sanchez, Scattering of scalar waves from a Schwarzschild black hole, J. Math. Phys. 17 (5) (1976) 688. doi:10.1063/1.522949

    work page doi:10.1063/1.522949 1976

  31. [35]

    S ´anchez, Elastic scattering of waves by a black hole, Phys

    N. S ´anchez, Elastic scattering of waves by a black hole, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 1798–1804. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1798. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.18. 1798

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.1798 1978

  32. [36]

    Scattering of scalar waves by rotating black holes

    K. Glampedakis, N. Andersson, Scattering of scalar waves by rotating black holes, Classical Quantum Gravity 18 (2001) 1939–1966. arXiv: gr-qc/0102100, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/10/309

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/10/309 2001

  33. [38]

    C. F. B. Macedo, E. S. de Oliveira, L. C. B. Crispino, Scattering by regular black holes: Planar massless scalar waves impinging upon a Bardeen black hole, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 024012. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.92.024012. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 024012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92 2015

  34. [39]

    L. C. S. Leite, C. F. B. Macedo, L. C. B. Crispino, Black holes with sur- rounding matter and rainbow scattering, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 064020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.064020. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.99. 064020

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.064020 2019

  35. [41]

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, E. Witten, Ultralight scalars as cosmo- logical dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 043541. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.95.043541. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95. 043541

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95 2017

  36. [42]

    Fermion scattering by a Schwarzschild black hole

    S. Dolan, C. Doran, A. Lasenby, Fermion scattering by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D74 (2006) 064005. arXiv:gr-qc/0605031, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.064005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.064005 2006

  37. [43]

    Dolan, Scattering, absorption and emission by black holes, Ph.D

    S. Dolan, Scattering, absorption and emission by black holes, Ph.D. the- sis, Trinity Hall and Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Univer- sity of Cambridge, Cambridge, England (2006)

    work page 2006

  38. [44]

    I. I. Cotaescu, C. Crucean, C. A. Sporea, Partial wave analysis of the Dirac fermions scattered from Schwarzschild black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (3) (2016) 102. arXiv:1409.7201, doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-016-3936-9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2016

  39. [45]

    I. I. Cotaescu, C. Crucean, C. Sporea, Partial wave analysis of the Dirac fermions scattered from Reissner–Nordstr ¨om charged black holes, Eur. Phys. J. C76 (7) (2016) 413. arXiv:1601.03673, doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-016-4260-0

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [47]

    Mashhoon, Electromagnetic scattering from a black hole and the glory effect, Phys

    B. Mashhoon, Electromagnetic scattering from a black hole and the glory effect, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 1059–1063. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.10.1059

    work page 1974

  41. [48]

    Fabbri, Scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys

    R. Fabbri, Scattering and absorption of electromagnetic waves by a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 933–942. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.933

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.12.933 1975

  42. [49]

    L. C. B. Crispino, S. R. Dolan, E. S. Oliveira, Electromagnetic wave scattering by Schwarzschild black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 231103. arXiv:0905.3339, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 102.231103

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009

  43. [50]

    C. V . Vishveshwara, Scattering of Gravitational Radiation by a Schwarzschild Black-hole, Nature 227 (1970) 936–938. doi:10. 1038/227936a0

    work page 1970

  44. [51]

    S. R. Dolan, Scattering of long-wavelength gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D77 (2008) 044004. arXiv:0710.4252, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.77.044004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [52]

    S. R. Dolan, Scattering and Absorption of Gravitational Plane Waves by Rotating Black Holes, Classical Quantum Gravity 25 (2008) 235002. arXiv:0801.3805, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/ 23/235002

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/ 2008

  46. [53]

    L. C. B. Crispino, S. R. Dolan, A. Higuchi, E. S. de Oliveira, Scatter- ing from charged black holes and supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 084056. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084056. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 084056

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.084056 2015

  47. [54]

    Instability of Massive Scalar Fields in Kerr-Newman Spacetime

    H. Furuhashi, Y . Nambu, Instability of massive scalar fields in Kerr- Newman space-time, Prog. Theor. Phys. 112 (2004) 983–995. arXiv: gr-qc/0402037, doi:10.1143/PTP.112.983

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1143/ptp.112.983 2004

  48. [55]

    K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes, scat- tering and Hawking radiation of Kerr-Newman black holes in a mag- netic field, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 024031.arXiv:1011.1843, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.024031 2011

  49. [56]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Massive charged scalar field in the Kerr- Newman background I: quasinormal modes, late-time tails and stabil- 6 ity, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 024054. arXiv:1307.1812, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.88.024054

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [57]

    R. A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Massive charged scalar field in the Kerr-Newman background: Hawking radiation, Phys. Rev. D89 (8) (2014) 084015. arXiv:1402.1998, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 89.084015

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd 2014

  51. [58]

    Huang, D.-J

    Y . Huang, D.-J. Liu, X.-h. Zhai, X.-z. Li, Instability for massive scalar fields in Kerr-Newman spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 025021.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.025021. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98. 025021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.025021 2018

  52. [60]

    C. L. Benone, L. C. B. Crispino, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, Kerr-newman scalar clouds, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 104024. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.104024. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.90. 104024

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90 2014

  53. [61]

    Huang, D.-J

    Y . Huang, D.-J. Liu, Scalar clouds and the superradiant instability regime of Kerr-Newman black hole, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 064030. doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.94.064030. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.94. 064030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94 2016

  54. [62]

    C. L. Benone, L. C. S. Leite, L. C. B. Crispino, S. R. Dolan, On-axis scalar absorption cross section of Kerr–Newman black holes: Geodesic analysis, sinc and low-frequency approximations, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics D 27 (11) (2018) 1843012. doi:10.1142/ S0218271818430125

    work page 2018

  55. [63]

    P. A. Collins, R. Delbourgo, R. M. Williams, On the elastic Schwarzschild scattering cross-section, J. Phys. A 6 (1973) 161–169. doi:10.1088/ 0305-4470/6/2/007

    work page 1973

  56. [64]

    H. M. Nussenzveig, High-frequency scattering by a transparent sphere. II. Theory of the rainbow and the glory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 10 (1) (1969) 125–176. doi:10.1063/1.1664747

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1664747 1969

  57. [65]

    DeWitt-Morette, B

    C. DeWitt-Morette, B. L. Nelson, Glories—and other degenerate points of the action, Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 1663–1668. doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.29.1663

    work page 1984

  58. [66]

    T. R. Zhang, C. DeWitt-Morette, WKB Cross Section for Polarized Glo- ries of Massless Waves in Curved Space-Times, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52 (1984) 2313–2316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.52.2313

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.2313 1984

  59. [67]

    G. B. Cook, M. Zalutskiy, Gravitational perturbations of the Kerr ge- ometry: High-accuracy study, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 124021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124021. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.90. 124021

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.124021 2014

  60. [68]

    L. C. S. Leite, S. R. Dolan, L. C. B. Crispino, Absorption of elec- tromagnetic and gravitational waves by Kerr black holes, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 130–134. arXiv:1707.01144, doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2017.09.048

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2017

  61. [69]

    L. C. S. Leite, S. Dolan, L. C. B. Crispino, Absorption of electromagnetic plane waves by rotating black holes, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 024046. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.024046. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98. 024046

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.024046 2018

  62. [70]

    D. R. Yennie, D. G. Ravenhall, R. N. Wilson, Phase-Shift Calculation of High-Energy Electron Scattering, Phys. Rev. 95 (2) (1954) 500–512. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.95.500. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.95. 500 7

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.95.500 1954